Infection Fatality Rate:

The survival rate for the flu across all ages is 99.998%, while the survival rate for Covid-19 is 99.99%. 

To help understand the true fatality of a disease, we look at the infection fatality rate (IFR).  The IFR represents the proportion of the people who die following an infection with SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19). As you will see at the first link listed under "Supporting Evidence" below (which further links to official US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organisation (WHO) data), the IFR of Covid-19 is very close to the IFR of Influenza (the Flu). 

So why was a global pandemic called, with a response that was so significantly different to the way in which we deal with the Flu every year?  Why did our government leaders and the mainstream media keep telling us that Covid-19 was so deadly, and that we needed to take such drastic measures to control it?

We have been living with corona viruses for decades.  Colds and Flus are all “corona viruses” and our ability to recover from the virus depends on our own natural immune system.  

It has always been the case that some people can, and do, die from these Corona viruses, if they have a weak immune system.  Those with a weak immune system typically include elderly people and people of any age with serious underlying health conditions.  The same demographic of people who die from influenza, like the elderly or those with other health conditions, die from Covid-19.  In fact the statistics clearly show that most of the people who died from Covid-19 across the globe, were over the age of life expectancy, and had an average of 2 to 3 other serious health issues (co-morbidities). 

The inventor of the PCR test, Nobel Prize winner Dr Kary Mullis, is on record as saying that you cannot interpret the results of the PCR test to diagnose disease. 

Dr Mullis stated "It doesn't tell you that you're sick or that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you in any way", "With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody".  Please see links to videos of Dr Kari Mullis below.

Sadly in August 2019, just months before Covid-19 was declared a pandemic, Kary Mullis suddenly died, so he was unable to speak out about how PCR test results were misused to diagnose Covid-19 infection.

There are a number of reasons why the PCR test is not fit to diagnose Covid-19 infection. Here are three of the key reasons.

Firstly the PCR test cannot distinguish between a live cell and a dead cell.

Secondly, it may detect other Corona virus cells such as Influenza A or B, falsely recorded as Covid-19 (see video at link below for an explanation of how the PCR test works and why this is true).

This means that if you were sick and since recovered from Covid-19 or influenza, the test would produce a positive result for Covid-19, even though the cells may be dead and of a different corona virus (cold or influenza).  But these false positive results were used as 'proof' by the government that you were sick and infectious with Covid-19, when in fact you were not. 

Did you or anyone you know test positive for Covid-19 and had to quarantine, yet never developed any symptoms?  Even if you did develop symptoms, it could have been another type of corona virus such as a cold or influenza.

Thirdly, the way the PCR test works is that it runs a number of 'cycles', with each cycle effectively magnifying cells.  Above 35 cycles, it is well known that you can find just about any type of cell for any illness as the test is magnifying minute particles that exist within us all.  And yet, all countries ran the test at cycles well above 35.  It almost seems as if they wanted to find Covid-19 virus in everyone. 

The above facts are well documented and well known by scientists.  Government regulators have also admitted the PCR tests are not fit to test whether or not someone is infected with Covid-19. 

For example, the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) eventually removed the PCR test in July 2021, because they had to admit that it gives a very high number of ‘false’ positives.  Yet many governments such as Australia are still using them to convince people that they have Covid-19, or to declare deaths as 'Covid-19' deaths, even though the Australian regulator, TGA, admitted that the PCR test cannot distinguish between a live and dead cell. 

These false positive test results have been used to increase and maintain fear amongst the population, as they have used false positive PCR test results to convince healthy people that they are sick, and also they have been used to report inflated numbers of Covid cases and Covid deaths (see more details on the false reporting in question 4 below).

Please see blow a video by Dr Derek Knauss, a clinical lab scientist who tested 1500 'supposed' positive Covid-19 samples collected in Southern California.  He found NO Covid-19 in any of the 1500 samples.  What they found instead was that mostly all of the samples were Influenza A and some were Influenza B. He also sent the samples to other university laboratories and they also found the same results - Influenza A and B, but NO Covid.

He then explains how he asked the US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) for samples of Covid-19, and they responded that they did not have any samples.  He states "we have now come to the firm conclusion, through all of our research and lab work, that Covid-19 was imaginary and fictitious, the Flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead had comorbidities such as heart disease cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc., then they got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died.  I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid-19 to work with.  "We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid-19 fraud...." 

The claims made by Dr Knauss are supported by numerous other scientists and doctors globally, who also believe that the Flu (albeit a bad flu initially) was simply relabeled Covid , and that there are many other factors that contributed to the numbers of 'Covid-19' infections, hospitalizations and deaths that were reported in the MSM.  Most of these contributing factors are discussed throughout this website, so please take the time to review all facts presented before drawing your final conclusions.

Whilst we encourage you to do your own research,  please find below some articles and videos to get you started on the topics of the PCR test and its inventor, Dr Kary Mullins; as well as the manipulation of Covid statistics.
 

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Dr Kary Mullis - use of PCR Test
2. Dr Kary Mullis Nobel Prize Winning Scientist on the PCR Test
3. Covid19 PCR Tests tests re scientifically meaningless - Bulgarian Pathology Association

You may have seen articles about people who never seem to catch Covid 19.  This is because many people have cross immunity from previous Corona viruses such as cold and flu.  Also, there are many research papers that show that natural immunity gained by catching Covid 19 and recovering, gives higher protection than the so-called vaccines. See some of the evidence at the links below.

Further evidence that not everyone will contract Covid-19 can be found in a trial conducted by the Imperial College of London very early in the pandemic.

In the trial, 36 healthy male and female volunteers aged 18-30 years, unvaccinated against COVID-19 and with no prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 were given a low dose of the virus – introduced via drops up the nose – and then carefully monitored by clinical staff in a controlled environment over a two-week period. The study used virus from very early in the pandemic obtained from a hospitalized patient in the ISARIC-4C study, prior to the emergence of the Alpha variant. Only eighteen of the volunteers became infected, 16 of whom went on to develop mild-to-moderate cold-like symptoms, including a stuffy or runny nose, sneezing, and a sore throat. Some experienced headaches, muscle/joint aches, tiredness and fever.  None developed serious symptoms

It should be noted that 16 of the 34 participants (i.e., 47%) did not get infected despite direct exposure up the nose. Some had detectable virus in their nose but did not go on to test positive twice on PCR tests, the threshold the team used for confirmed infection.

Prior to the Covid pandemic, it was well understood, not just by the medical and scientific community, but also by most of the general public, that we are all born with a natural immune system that is working 24 x 7 to protect us from both catching and recovering from, all sorts of illnesses and viruses.  Yet for some reason when the pandemic struck, decades of common knowledge about our body's own natural immune system was not only dismissed, but anyone who tried to remind us of this very powerful protection that is within us all, were demonized and 'silenced', as the official narrative pushed the need for vaccines for everyone, regardless of age, health or risk factors of each individual. 

One of the studies, a retrospective observational study of 124,500 individuals, conducted during the Delta wave, compared people who had not been previously infected and received 2 doses of the Pfizer 'vaccine', with previously infected individuals who had not been vaccinated.  The study showed that those who had been vaccinated had a 13-fold greater chance of breakthrough infection, compared to re-infection in the non-vaccinated group.  The conclusion of the study authors was: 'Natural acquired immunity confers stronger protection against infection and symptomatic disease caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2-2 (Pfizer Covid-19 'vaccine') dose vaccine-induced immunity'.

The findings of this study is backed up by many doctors and scientists globally, including Australian Clinical Trial and Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs Consultant, Dr Phillip M Altman, who states in his paper 'The Time of Covid' in August 2022: "Natural immunity plays an important role in Covid-19.  There is no evidence to suggest that Covid-19 gene-based 'vaccination'offers superior protection from Covid-19 as compared to natural immunity.  Indeed, many believe the reverse is true'.

You can easily find hundreds of papers, videos and articles on the important role of natural immunity in fighting all disease and illness, including Covid-19.  Below we provide a small sample of such references to get you started in your research.  Please review this supporting evidence and draw your own conclusions as to the level of risk that Covid poses to healthy people, both in contracting the virus, and their chances of recovering through natural immunity if they do become ill. 

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Covid-19 Human Challenge Study
2. Jan 2023 - Natural Immunity vs MRNA jab - new large study published in top medical journal Lancet (15 min video)
3. December 2022 - Natural Cross Immunity confirmed - Dr John Campbell
4. April 2022 - Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Naturally Acquired Immunity versus Vaccine-induced Immunity, Reinfections versus Breakthrough Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study
5. Nov 2022 - Dr Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus at Kyoto University and Director and Chairman of Translational Research Informatics Center (TRI), Japan., warns about vax harms to the Ministry of Health
6. August 2022 - Brownstone Institute: Mandatory mis-remembering on natural immunity

The old are 1,000 times more at risk of being infected with Covid 19 than the young, just as they are with Influenza and most other diseases. 

In the USA, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) statistics show that 95% of Covid-related deaths list an average of 4 comorbidities (other serious health conditions), while 5% list Covid as the only known cause of death. Such comorbidities include cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), and cancer (5.6%). The average age of Covid-related death is 77 years old.   

These factors are similar in other countries, which show that most people who die from Covid-19 are over the age of life expectancy and have on average at least 2 to 3 other serious underlying health issues.  

It was also well known at the beginning of the pandemic, that a large percentage of people who were hospitalized with Covid 19, were Vitamin D deficient, which is common for many people during winter in the Northern hemisphere. 

Please see the table below, which shows the infection fatality rate (IFR) of Covid-19 by age group.  Overall, you can see that this is a disease with a 99.94% recovery rate (at the time of this study, but latest data now shows a 99.99% recovery rate), which is very similar to the recovery rate for the annual flu.

Children and young people under 30 have an almost zero chance of dying from Covid, or even becoming seriously ill.  We have not been able to find one case in the world where a healthy child with no other underlying health condition has died of Covid 19.  And if they do become infected, the evidence shows that they will have a good level of natural immunity against future infection.  So it is difficult to understand any reason to vaccinate young, healthy children and adults with an experimental 'vaccine' with no long term safety data, when they have virtually zero risk of dying from Covid.

Even those in the 30-39 year old age group have a 99.99% recovery rate, 40-49 year olds - 99.97%;  50-59 year olds - 99.87%; and 60-69 year olds - 99.5% recovery rate.  The data clearly shows that Covid-19 has the highest impact on the elderly, as do all other Corona viruses such as Colds and Flu's.

There was clear data about the infection and fatality rate of Covid-19 in February 2020 when the Diamond Princess, a British-registered luxury and cruise ship, during a cruise of the Western Pacific, detected cases of COVID-19 on board. The vessel was quarantined off Japan for two weeks, after which all remaining passengers and crew were evacuated. Of the 3,711 people on board, 712 became infected with the virus – 567 of 2,666 passengers, and 145 of 1,045 crew. Figures for total deaths vary from early to later assessments, and because of difficulties in establishing causation. As many as 14 are reported to have died from the virus, all of them older passengers.

For anyone who has been on a cruise ship you would understand that this is the perfect breeding ground for the spread of a virus due to the extremely small and close living quarters and common areas for passengers. Also, the age range of passengers is generally heavily skewed to the older population, who are much more susceptible to severe outcomes from a virus. So the spread of Covid-19 in such an environment is likely to be a 'worst-case scenario' for transmission.

Yet even in this scenario, less than 20% of those on board caught Covid-19 and of those, no more than 14 died - an overall mortality rate for those infected of 2%, but an overall mortality rate of about one-third of 1 % or a 99.6% recovery.  And bear in mind that this would likely be much less in the general community with many more younger people who were not living in such close contact. So these statistics from February 2020 show clearly that only the elderly were likely to die from Covid-19 and that the fatality rate was no worse than the Flu.

Even though these facts were well known very early in the pandemic, the experimental vaccines have been, and continue to be, injected into children and young people in many countries.  Some countries like the USA have even started injecting babies from 6 months old.  

You should note; however, that Authorities around the world are finally starting to admit these facts, as many countries have restricted Covid-19 vaccinations for children and young people under 30 years old, some countries have stopped vaccinating low risk under 50 year olds, and some countries in Europe have withdrawn approval for vaccinating children under 18 years.  These withdrawals have been due to mounting evidence of heart inflammation and other serious side effects of the vaccines.  For children and young people with such a low risk of serious outcomes from Covid-19, these often serious, and in some cases life threatening vaccine side effects, pose a far greater risk than catching Covid-19.

As more and more people become aware of these significant risks, there has been a marked decrease in the number of people willing to take the vaccines, as evidenced by reports of a number of countries having to dispose of excess stock.  

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Germany & France restrict Moderna's Covid vaccine for under 30's over rare heart risk despite surging cases
2. Sept 2022: Denmark halts Covid vaccinations for low risk people under 50
3. Sweden to stop offering Covid vaccine to teenagers
4. Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies | medRxiv.org
5. Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in community-dwelling populations with emphasis on the elderly: An overview | medRxiv.org

Globally, there are tens of thousands of ethical doctors, scientists, and lawyers, as well as millions of concerned citizens, all calling for governments to STOP vaccinating children and pregnant women against Covid-19 (see more information and evidence on this at Q5 below). 

This is because there is no evidence that children are at serious risk of hospitalization or death from Covid-19.  In fact, many studies and analyses of the trial data used to obtain EUA (Emergency Use Approval) for the Covid-19 vaccine for children, show a significantly higher risk of death or serious injury from the vaccines, compared to the virus. We have not been able to find one case worldwide of a healthy child dying from Covid-19, and yet 31* children are reported dead in connection with their Covid-19 vaccines on the USA's Center for Disease Control (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).  The CDC denies causality. *Note: The Report at the link below quotes 14 deaths of children based on an earlier period, which has risen to 31 deaths as at late 2022 and this number continues to rise.  

Did you know that one of the children in the original Pfizer trial for children, Maddie de Garay from the USA, had serious adverse reactions to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, which have severely impacted her health for life. Pfizer responded by excluding her from the trial results, which means the severity of her side effects were not reported in the data that was provided to government regulators for approval of the vaccines.  Maddie's mother reported that she was not advised of the potential side effects that her daughter suffered at the time that she entered the trial, even though these same side effects had been reported by adults who had received the vaccine.

Maddie's story is well-known by those who have been following the real world data; data which is not reported on the mainstream news, as Maddie and her mother have presented her case to the US Senate.  Yet there has been no follow up or support for Maddie and her family and no consequences for Pfizer for excluding this information from the trial report data.  This case begs the question as to why didn't the mainstream media report this information?  Don't you think that parents around the world have the right to know that this is a possible risk for their child if they give them the vaccine?

You may recall that the original reason why our governments encouraged children to get vaccinated was to protect elderly or vulnerable family members.  But it is now widely accepted that the vaccines do not prevent anyone from becoming infected or transmitting the virus, and yet regulators around the world continue to promote the Covid-19 vaccines for children, even though they are at virtually zero risk of serious outcomes from Covid-19.  For those who can't see for themselves that these vaccines do not prevent transmission, please see the video contained in the next FACT on this site below of a European MEP who asked a Pfizer Executive in a EU session in mid October 2022, whether Pfizer tested their C-19 vaccine to determine whether it could stop transmission of the virus.  The answer she gave was 'No'.  So the push for everyone to get vaccinated to protect others, was a blatant lie by our governments.  Why was this serious discovery not reported anywhere in the world by mainstream media?   Why was this very important information hidden from the public?

It has been suggested by a number of organizations, that the reason for the push to approve the Covid 19 vaccinations for children is due to legal indemnity laws.  It seems that in some countries such as the USA, if the vaccines are approved for children and added to the annual child vaccination program, it gives the Pharmaceutical companies protection against liability for any harm their vaccines may cause to anyone of any age . Sadly, in October 2022, the US government did in fact approve for the Covid-19 vaccines to be added to the annual childhood vaccine schedule. Many are afraid that in some states this approval could lead to children being forced to be vaccinated with these experimental products in order to go to school.  There are many ethical doctors and lawyers fighting to have this decision overturned. See evidence below on this matter.

Those who have been following the true science and the real world data, are very concerned about the harms that the Covid-19 vaccines are causing and may cause in the future, not only to the children who are vaccinated, but also to the children born to women who are vaccinated either before, or during pregnancy.  There have been no published safety studies for the Covid 19 mRNA vaccines conducted specifically on pregnant women, and there is no way of knowing with any certainty at this point in time, what if any, effects the vaccines may cause for future generations.

What we do know; however, is that there have been many reports from doctors around the world, that in vaccinated women, there has been a significant increase in the rates of sudden miscarriages as well as still births.  This raises important safety signals that should be investigated by government regulators to determine if these cases are linked to the experimental vaccines. Please see more on this issue in supporting evidence below.

Sadly, in spite of very minimal testing, many countries have already given emergency use or provisional approval of the Covid-19 vaccines for children and even babies.  This is in spite of the almost zero risk from Covid, as well as calls from thousands of experienced medical experts, scientists and legal professionals, as well as millions of concerned citizens worldwide NOT to approve these vaccines for children.

USEFUL LINKS:

1. Childrens Health Defense
2. Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

As we see right now all around the world, the vaccines do not prevent contracting or spreading  Covid-19 (which was the reason the government originally gave for forcing mandates). 

The lie that we all needed to be vaccinated to protect the elderly and vulnerable, has now been fully exposed in the European parliament.  For those who can't see around them that these vaccines do not prevent transmission, please see the video link below of a European MEP who asked a Pfizer Executive in a EU session in mid October 2022, whether Pfizer tested their C-19 vaccine to determine whether it could stop transmission of the virus.  The answer she gave was 'No'.  So the push for everyone to get vaccinated to protect others, was a blatant lie by our governments.  Why was the exposure of this important fact in the EU parliament not reported anywhere in the world by mainstream media?   Why was this very important information hidden from the public?

Before this lie was exposed in October 2022, governments around the world had already changed their message from we all need to get vaccinated to 'stop the spread', to promoting that the vaccines are 'effective in preventing serious illness or death', but there is no evidence of this either, particularly since more people, most of whom are double or triple ore even quadruple jabbed, are dying now from Covid-19, than during 2020 before the vaccines existed.

So if anyone tries to tell you ''but the vaccines have saved millions of lives", we would strongly recommend that you watch the video 'Before and After' at the link below, which shows the results of a definitive study of the impact of the Covid-19 vaccines on every country in the world.

This data shows compelling evidence, based on real world vaccine deaths data, that post-vaccination Covid deaths have been 75% higher in the year since the vaccine roll-out across the globe.  All but a handful of nations have suffered with higher Covid-19 death rates post-vaccination.  But the countries that have suffered the most are those that have the highest rates of vaccination and associated vaccine mandates.

Do not simply believe the information reported in the video, you can check the data for yourself.  We also provide a useful link to 'Our World in Data' where you can look up the raw data for yourself for each country.

Our governments knew, or should have known, that these vaccines could not prevent the spread of Covid-19, as there has existed for many years, the clear scientific evidence that proves this fact.

Due to the way in which the ‘vaccines’ were designed, it is not possible for them to prevent anyone from catching or spreading Covid-19.  Watch the following video of Australian Professor Edward J Steele, Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist, who explains scientifically why a vaccine in the arm cannot stop a respiratory virus.  In his own words he concludes "I want to say it emphatically and I'll take on all comers on this one - it can't work!!

Evidence of this fact was also presented to the Australian Parliament in August 2022 by Senator Gerard Rennick.  He also pointed out that it was never possible for these vaccines to stop the spread of the virus, and all governments and their health regulatory bodies had this information at the time that they approved the vaccines and mandated them to be given to the population to ‘stop the spread’.  This is either gross incompetence or a blatant lie told by governments all around the world.

The fact that the vaccines do not stop the spread, is further supported by real world data that clearly shows that countries with higher vaccination rates, now have higher Covid-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths, compared to countries with lower vaccination rates.

It is important to understand that our governments and regulators have NOT been telling us the truth!  We know this because each time one of their lies is exposed by ethical politicians or concerned citizens, they simply change the narrative.  

Think about it!  They told us we all need to be vaccinated to protect the old, the vulnerable and each other from infection or transmission.  When it was finally undeniable that the vaccines don't work as traditional vaccines (because they are not traditional vaccines), the narrative changed to say that we need to get vaccinated to protect ourselves from severe illness or death.  But there is no evidence that the vaccines do that either!  More vaccinated people are dying now from Covid-19, than unvaccinated deaths before the vaccines, so where is the evidence that the vaccines are protecting anyone from anything?

Another example of a lie uncovered, is when people discovered that the Covid-19 cases and death numbers included those dying of other causes, who also had a positive PCR test for Covid 19; the narrative changed to reporting cases and deaths 'from' Covid, instead of 'with' Covid. 

You will also notice all around the world, that as countries draw close to any government elections, restrictions and mandates seem to be lifted, even though the Covid case numbers haven't changed.

The only way to know the truth is to find it for yourselves.  Please look into the evidence below in more detail to find the answers.  You may also want to consider how much of your information you obtain from the government and mainstream media.  At the very least, you need to ask your government leaders for the evidence upon which their policies are based.  You may be surprised to find that the evidence that you assumed they had, does not in fact exist.  And if you let them, they will just keep changing the narrative, without being held accountable for what is at best incompetence, and at worst, blatant lies for motives that are yet to be determined.  Either way, their policies and mandates have had serious harmful impacts on people and society at many levels.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Before and After - Covid-19 death rates for each country before and after vaccination programs

USEFUL LINKS:

1.  Our World in Data

YES, there were a number of known, very effective, low-cost drugs that were available to treat Covid-19 from the outset.  

Two treatments in particular -  Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, had very good safety data over many decades. The discovery of Ivermectin even won a Nobel prize as it is such an effective, safe drug.

See the table in the evidence below that shows the safety of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and other traditional vaccines compared to the Covid-19 vaccines.  The regulators will say that the numbers show significantly higher deaths from Covid-19 vaccines because so many people were vaccinated.  But that is not a valid argument as the Covid vaccines, which have only been in use since mid 2021, show ten times more reported deaths compared to ALL other vaccines combined, over many decades. 

There are also many vitamins and natural treatments that are very effective in boosting your natural immune system, such as Vitamin C, Vitamin D and Zinc.  Boosting your own natural immunity is an important protection against contracting any illness, including Covid-19.  Also bear in mind, that many of the people who were hospitalized or died with Covid-19 were found to be Vitamin D deficient.  Vitamin D is a very important vitamin for a well-functioning immune system.

At the beginning of the pandemic, many doctors developed effective treatment protocols for Covid-19 using these drugs and supplements, as well as many others, with a very high success rate in preventing hospitalization and death.

All of the doctors who spoke out about these treatments also explained that the key to success was early treatment of Covid-19, i.e. to begin treatment as soon as symptoms arose; or even to administer some of these products prior to symptoms arising in order to prevent contracting the virus, by boosting people's natural immune systems.  

So why did Health Ministers in many countries around the world advise people who contracted Covid-19 to stay home, do nothing and wait until they couldn’t breathe before coming to the hospital for treatment?  This advice has never been given for any disease in history, so why was this advice given in respect of Covid-19?  Particularly when frontline doctors were advising the regulators that early treatment was critical to prevent hospitalization and death in Covid-19 patients.

Some countries and states handed out care packages to all of their population, so that as soon as they started to feel any symptoms, they could immediately take the treatments. 

One well known case of this is Uttar Pradesh, the most populace state in India, with 240 million people.  In June 2021, their health officials started using a number of drugs including Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid 19.  They went from a peak number of cases of 34,455 on 29 April 2021 to 178 cases on 26 June 2021. A year later there is an average of one death per day.  Clearly these drugs work in treating Covid-19 – a test group of 240 million people should be enough proof!

Yet in spite of the success of treatments using these cheap drugs, many governments around the world systematically either banned the use of these drugs or prevented doctors from prescribing the drugs to their patients. 

Furthermore, those ethical doctors who fought for their patients, by continuing to use these treatments based on their own clinical frontline experience that these drugs were saving lives, were persecuted by regulatory bodies, who discredited both them and the drugs.  In many cases, these brave, experienced doctors, many of whom were leaders in their field, had their licenses suspended or cancelled.  See articles below with further details.

Ivermectin in particular was being labelled by mainstream media as a 'horse de-wormer' as this drug is used for both humans and animals.  But this was clearly a smear campaign to prevent people from asking their doctors for this treatment.  There are numerous well researched, peer reviewed scientific papers on the safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating Covid-19, as you will see in the Supporting Evidence below.   

In particular please take the time to watch the video 'The Ivermectin Story and Corruption around Suppressing its' Use to Save Lives'.  It is extremely difficult to understand why the 'pandemic' was allowed to continue, once the evidence that is presented in this video became available to regulators around the world.  Even if you read or watch nothing further on this website, PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO!  It is very telling of what really caused the 'pandemic'.

Please also watch the video from Dr Kory, who exposes the fraudulent trials published to discredit Ivermectin.  Sadly the captured mainstream media only reported the results of the fraudulent trials, and not the many, many Ivermectin trials that showed how incredibly effective Ivermectin is in treating Covid-19.

You will also find below other details of the lengths that the US  and Australian governments in particular went to, to prevent the use of both Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.  Please review this important information below.

If you still have any doubt that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for Covid, which could have saved tens of thousands of live, please watch the video below "Saving Lives with Ivermectin", a son's personal account of how he fought the system to treat his father with Ivermectin and saved his life. 

Then watch the video in which Dr Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the USA, who referred to himself as 'the science' for all things Covid, advised that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine do nothing for Covid.  Dr Fauci, a bureaucrat who does not treat patients, ignored frontline doctors who were saving lives with Ivermectin.  Do you think his advice was well founded and responsible?  If you watch the video below FDA Backflips on Ivermectin, it certainly does seem that Dr Fauci was wrong, the frontline doctors were right, and sadly, many lives were lost unnecessarily due to bureaucrats interfering in the doctor's treatment of their patients.

You may well ask, why would the government regulators interfere with a doctor's clinical experience and prevent them from using safe, effective treatments?

The answer is simply this:  in order for the new Covid-19 vaccines to be approved under 'Emergency Use Approval (EUA)' or 'Provisional approval' regulations, there cannot exist any other effective treatment.  This is because EUA or provisional approvals do not require the same level of testing of the new drugs, as would normally be required under regular approval.  The theory is that although the testing is not complete and therefore, we don't really know the full safety profile of the drugs or the long-term side effects, we are in an ‘emergency’ situation and there are no other treatments.  So, it is considered that taking the extra risks of approving new, experimental drugs is warranted, since there is no other option for treatment.  As the government regulators were very motivated to get the entire world vaccinated, these safe treatments that were already available, would have put an end to bringing these new, experimental drugs to market.

You many also be interested to know that most of the funding of the health regulatory bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO), comes from the big pharmaceutical companies and other private organizations, all of whom profited handsomely from the sale of the vaccines.  This leaves many to question whether these regulators were in fact serving the interests of the public, or the interests of those who fund them.  It is also understood that at least some of those who made decisions to approve the vaccines, also have financial interests in the sale of the vaccines, either directly or indirectly.

Please review the supporting evidence below to form your own opinion as to whether there were other, safer, more effective treatments that would have potentially eliminated the call for Covid-19 to be classified as a 'pandemic'.

You can also find more information on this topic at  Q4 below, under 'Fact: Covid-19 was Treatable from Day 1 with safe existing drugs, so vaccines were not the only way out of the 'pandemic', even if they had worked'.

LINKS:

1. Stop World Control
2. Dr Poormina Wagh - Compelling evidence of a PLANdemic
3. Redacted News "It's Starting, Bill Gates announces the next pandemic date and outbreak location
4. They were researching Covid where? - YouTube

You need to seriously consider how much you can trust information and drug trial results that are published by a drug company about their own products, from which they have made tens of billions of dollars in profits.  They are very unlikely to publish any negative safety results or tell you that their products don’t really work very well, as that would reduce their sales and profits.  Companies don’t exist to protect you and your family, they exist solely to make profits for their shareholders or owners.

Did you know that big pharmaceutical companies, some of whom are currently selling Covid-19 vaccines, have a history of paying billions of dollars in damages to people harmed and killed by their products?  The courts ordered payment of these damages because the evidence showed that the companies knew that the products were unsafe, but they sold them anyway.  This is likely because they did a 'cost benefit analysis' and determined that the cost of any lawsuits would be much less than the profits they would make from the sales.

As the saying goes, “if you want to know what is really going on, follow the money; if you want to know the truth, look to those who are being silenced”.

Please see several articles and videos below that provide some insight into how Big Pharma operates, to help you form your own opinion as to how much you are prepared to trust them with the health and lives of you and your family.

The video below of Robert F Kennedy Jr. interviewing UK Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra is particularly interesting, as they discuss Dr Malhotra's recent research on the Covid-19 vaccines, including the role of big Pharma throughout the pandemic and in its influence over the Health system in general.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. How Big Pharma Pushes Dangerous Drugs and Reaps Profits
2. Pfizers's history of Fraud and Corruption
3. US Justice Department Announces Largest Healthcare Fraud Settlement in its' History
4. Covid-19 Vaccine Pharmacovigilance Report
5. Dr Aseem Malhotra: Pfizer's Raw Data shows Significant Harm - Pfizer Senior Execs and Scientists Must Have Known This
6. Robert F. Kennedy Jr: Evidence Based Medicine with Dr Aseem Malhotra

USEFUL LINKS:

1.  Our World In Data

A number of politicians around the world did state clearly at the beginning of the pandemic that the vaccine rollout was a global experiment, including Australia’s Chief Health Officer, Greg Hunt.   But it was done rather quietly and never repeated again, and people were not told this fact at the time they were injected.  This breaches laws around ‘fully informed consent’. 

Prior to Covid-19 vaccines, it was unethical for any doctor to give any treatment to a patient without their ‘fully informed, voluntary consent’.  In fact, in most countries doctors could lose their license to practice and be sued if they did so.

‘Fully informed’, means that patients must be told of the potential side effects of the drugs, and in the case of an experimental drug, they must also be clearly told that they are part of an experiment.  Pfizer documents released under a Freedom of Information Request in the USA, revealed pages of known side effects of their Covid 19 vaccine, yet patients were not given this information before being injected, so that they could be ‘fully informed’. 

‘Voluntary’ consent, means you cannot coerce someone to take a drug or treatment.  Threatening loss of job (i.e. vaccine mandates) is a serious form of coercion. 

So given that people were not told they were in an experiment, were not told of all potential side effects, and in many cases were coerced to take the vaccine under threat of losing their job and ability to pay their mortgage and feed their family if they did not do so,  it was not possible for anyone to give fully informed, voluntary consent, prior to taking these drugs.

In some countries at different times after the injections were given, vaccines were then withdrawn due to risks of side effects.  For example, in some countries AstraZeneca vaccine was stopped due to blood clots.  Vaccines for children in a number of European countries have now been stopped due to risk of serious side effects (called adverse events).

The rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines breaks numerous domestic and international human rights laws including the Nuremberg Code, which was developed to ensure that the atrocities of World War II could never again be inflicted upon mankind.  The Nuremburg Code specifically says that no-one can be forced to take an experimental treatment, yet this well-established law was ignored by all western countries.

Now many people have suffered side effects, life-long injuries or disabilities, and even lost loved ones, as a result of being vaccinated for Covid-19, many against their will.  Information on the reports of 'adverse events' and deaths from the 'vaccines', is publicly available on government websites in most countries, as well as the WHO website.  See links to some of these reporting databases below.

You may also wish to view the documentary "Uninformed Consent" linked below.  This documentary provides an indepth look into the Covid-19 narrative of fear created by governments and public health officials, and how many people were coerced to take the vaccine without informed consent of the risk of potential side effects.

USEFUL LINKS:

1. October 2022: Matador Films - Uninformed Consent Documentary - An In-depth Look into the Covid-19 Narrative
2. OpenVAERS - US data on Vaccine Adverse Events Reports
3. TGA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety Reports Australian data
4. UK Government - Summary of yellow card reporting on Covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions including deaths

It will likely come as a huge shock to most of the trusting public, that your doctors were 'silenced' from expressing any opinion about the Covid 19 vaccines that was different to the 'official narrative' of the vaccines being 'safe and effective'.  Any doctor, scientist, lawyer or well-informed citizen who expressed concerns about the safety and effectiveness of these drugs, or who questioned the need to vaccinate healthy people who were not at serious risk from the Covid-19 virus, were the target of various actions to 'silence' their questions and concerns from being heard or shared.

Some of the actions that governments and regulators around the world used were:

1.  Governments partnered with both mainstream media (MSM) channels, as well as social media and big tech companies like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, to ensure that ONLY the 'official narrative' would be reported, and to 'remove or suspend social media accounts of people who the 'fact checkers' decided were spreading misinformation.  Many of those whose accounts were suspended or removed, were leading experts in their fields of medicine and science, yet medically unqualified 'fact-checkers' who were hired by big tech companies, were making decisions to shut down the opinions of these experts from being shared.  This should be of grave concern to anyone who lives in a free democracy.  Without freedom of speech, we cannot have freedom!  Many of these experts were trying to warn people that the vaccines were not 100% safe, nor effective.  No matter how much detailed scientific evidence and real world data these experts provided, they were still silenced. Please see video below from November 2022 where unconstitutional Federally directed censorship was fully exposed by US Senator Hawley, during questioning of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.  Please also watch the video at the first link below, to see just how badly the public broadcasters and MSM failed the people.

2.  Government regulators sent letters to doctors and health professionals, effectively warning them that if they did not follow government policies such as mass vaccination, and advise their patients that the vaccines were safe and effective, that they would be sanctioned, including losing their license to practice.  So your doctors in many countries were not permitted to use their own clinical experience or inform you of any concerns they may have had about the vaccines based on scientific evidence, or consider your individual health conditions and personal risk factors to determine whether or not you should take the vaccine.  Many doctors who did ignore the threats from the regulators and put their patients first, did in fact suffer targeted attacks from their regulatory bodies, and many did in fact lose their license to practice.

Following is just one example, from Australia, of how Regulators silenced doctors in this way.  The letter below was sent to medical practitioners in Australia, by AMPS, a group of ethical medical practitioners who spoke out against the medical tyranny imposed by the Australian government.

You will see in the letter that they refer to a joint statement issued by Australia's medical regulator AHPRA, and National Medical Boards, threatening regulatory action "for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims, including on social media".

As the letter also points out, this threat was issued contrary to the Doctors' duty to warn patients of any material risks associated with the treatment, as well as ensuring their decisions are being made without undue coercion.

So this put all Doctors in Australia in the position whereby if they fulfilled their Duty to their patients, by warning them of the evidence from reputable sources demonstrating that Covid-19 provisionally-approved vaccines have real known and unknown harms and immuno-compromising effects, they could lose their medical license to practice or face other regulatory sanctions for 'anti-vaccination messages'. 

This same tactic to silence Doctors was used in many countries around the world, and many highly reputable Doctors and medical experts did in fact face sanctions for fulfilling their duty of care to their patients, by informing them of the risks of the vaccines.

  

3.  Effective, safe drugs that were available to treat Covid-19 from the beginning of the pandemic, were restricted by many governments around the world including the USA, Australia, the UK and Canada, from use by doctors to treat Covid-19.  In some countries the doctors were not allowed to prescribe these drugs, and in some countries these drugs were removed from the market altogether so that doctors could not even write a prescription for the drugs.  Early in the pandemic, many good doctors had already identified that certain drugs such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were very successful in treating Covid 19, with many doctors having a 100% success rate with these drugs early in the pandemic before the vaccines were available.  Yet government regulators who do not treat patients, were dictating to doctors that they could no longer use these effective treatments.  

4. Hospitals in many countries were given significant financial incentives to treat Covid-19 patients, using treatment protocols provided by the government regulators.  Is it any wonder that people who were admitted to hospital with a range of illnesses, were classified as 'Covid-19'patients on testing positive on arrival, even when they were being treated or died of another illness?  There are numerous reports of doctors and families begging hospitals to use other treatment options using existing safe drugs that had been proven to be more effective than the protocols that the hospitals were directed to follow (note the hospital protocols included the use of new Covid-19 drugs). Some people even took their case to court.  It simply makes no sense that a person's own doctor who is experienced in treating patients in hospital, was not allowed to treat their patients using the best practices and drugs that they knew were effective.  In many cases, particularly in the USA, these experienced doctors were 'overridden' by the government and corporate hospital system, and sadly in too many cases, their patients died after they were treated using the hospital treatment protocol, against the will of the patient, their family and their personal physician.

Many doctors, scientists and other experts have expressed their opinion that hundreds of thousands of lives could have been saved if the they had been permitted to speak openly and debate the official narrative around Covid-19 and the vaccines; as well as use safe, cheap, effective drugs that were already available to treat Covid-19.  

Why would the regulators silence the experts and health practitioners who are treating patients and restrict the use of these drugs, it simply makes no sense?  Any why did the bureaucrats interfere with the doctor-patient relationship?  Surely your doctor is best placed to understand your individual health condition and risk factors, and be best placed to use his or her clinical experience to determine what is best for you, not a government bureaucrat!

Of course not all doctors did speak out, as many themselves simply trusted the information provided by government regulators.  But what is concerning, is that most of the funding for the government regulators and organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) comes from corporate interests such as the big pharma companies who supply the vaccines.  There is clearly a conflict of interest here which has caused many to question whether these regulators were serving the best interests of the people, or the interests of those companies who provided their income.

You may wish to consider, as detailed in other sections of this website, that the new experimental vaccines could not have been approved if there already existed effective treatments for Covid-19.  This leaves many to question whether this could be the reason why the regulators, who are funded by the vaccine suppliers, went to such lengths to silence doctors and restrict the use of existing treatments.  There were hundreds of billions of dollars of profits made from the sale of the Covid-19 vaccines, so the financial incentive to get these drugs into as many arms as possible was extremely high.  Do you think this profit incentive may have something to do with why the above unprecedented control over our doctors and interference between the doctor-patient relationship, which ignored all previously held, globally accepted, good medical ethics and practices, was undertaken? 

You may also ask how was it possible to achieve such a co-ordinated suppression of global experts and factual information, such that only the 'agreed narrative' on the pandemic was reported in lockstep by the MSM around the world.  And how were those in control able to manipulate millions of people worldwide to accept the narrative in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary? The video at the first link below provides a detailed answer to this very question.  In the video, an experienced retired Canadian journalist outlines, with evidence, how mainstream media channels, including public broadcasters, colluded globally to spread an agreed narrative that was not truthful, nor based on scientific evidence. 

Also see the link below to details of the 'Trusted News Initiative' a BBC led, globally co-ordinated 'Ministry of Truth'.

Other links below also provide further evidence of how extensive the censorship of truthful, scientific information has been throughout the pandemic.

It is also worth noting, that JFK did try to warn us before his assassination, of the importance of free speech to combat forces within our governments and trusted institutions who work against the best interests of the people (see video below).

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Journalist's Explosive Testimony Reveals the Media's Criminal Conspiracy To Commit Genocide
2. Jan 2023 BBC comes under pressure for censorship
3. BBC Led Trusted News Initiative - Censorship Major Factor in 2 Million Deaths
4. Doctors being silenced and Uttar Pradesh use of ivermectin

5. Doctor Suspended From Houston Methodist Hospital Over Views On COVID-19

6. Censorship and Athletes Dropping Like Flies from "Safe and Effective"- Matt Le Tissier

7. Nov 2022: Groundbreaking: Study Details How Media, Big Tech Censored Doctors and Scientists Who Challenged COVID Narrative
8. Nov 2022 - On doctors being silenced "Hang On, Your Doctor Can’t Tell You WHAT Now?!"
9. Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics
10. South African GP who raised alarm about Omicron was pressured NOT to call it Mild

When the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines began, we were assured by our governments, regulators and mainstream media outlets, that these new experimental drugs were 'safe and effective'.  Many people, including very experienced, highly qualified doctors and scientists, had raised safety concerns due to how quickly these new drugs were developed and approved for use.  But we were assured even by our doctors (i.e., those doctors who were following the regulators directives) that the substance injected into our arms did not enter the blood stream or circulate throughout the body, but rather that the vaccine remained at the injection site, which may cause some people to have a sore arm for a few days.  This information was offered as comfort to assure us that these new drugs could not cause us unknown harms by circulating throughout the body.

This claim of the vaccine remaining at the injection site, was made by our regulators and doctors,  even though studies conducted before the drugs were approved, clearly showed that the vaccine circulated throughout the body including to major organs such as the brain, the heart, the liver and the ovaries.

There is now non disputable evidence that the vaccine does not remain at the injection site and in fact can enter the blood stream and go to every part of the body.  Even the Center For Disease Control  (CDC) in the USA, now admits this to be true.  Please see image below of how the information on the CDC's website has changed over time, because various facts that doctors and scientists revealed on social media (for which they were 'fact checked' and had their accounts suspended or removed) eventually accumulated so much overwhelming evidence, that the CDC had to regularly update their website to remove false claims that they had previously made about the vaccines.

Please also see a report below, "The Time of Covid" by Dr Phillip Altman, Clinical Trial & Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs Consultant, in which he explains in Section 10 in respect of the mRNA vaccines, that the mRNA does not remain at the injection site and is not rapidly destroyed.  He also discusses the potential impact of this fact.

Now you may think that the regulators did the best they could with the information that they had at the time. But this is simply not true.  The evidence that the substance injected did not stay at the injection site, was available to the regulators at the time these 'vaccines' were approved. 

If you don't believe this, please watch the video below by Dr Campbell, where he shows you documented evidence from the Australian Regulator, the TGA, that the Pfizer vaccine went to all major organs in the body, and this information was in the hands of the the TGA, in JANUARY 2021. You can be sure that every other regulator around the world also had this same document from Pfizer in their hands at the time they approved these vaccines for use.  This document has only come to light as a result of a Freedom of Information request.

Subsequent evidence of the real world harms that these products have caused to people, simply further supports the original evidence .  The original evidence should have raised alarm bells about the potential safety risks of these products before they were approved.  Yet our regulators, many of our doctors who relied on information from the regulators, and our media, all assured us that these drugs were 'safe' and that they remained at the injection site. 

It seems the CDC, other government regulators and the mainstream media were in fact the ones providing the 'misinformation', and not the ethical doctors and scientists who spoke out to reveal the true facts.  CDC's admission of their misinformation through removal of what they had previously claimed to be facts, should in itself cause any reasonable person to question what other 'facts' promoted through mainstream media from government regulators, may also be 'misinformation' or 'disinformation'.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Dr Phillip Altman: The Time of Covid - August 2022

Tens of thousands of doctors around the world have provided significant evidence on how toxic the vaccines are.  In fact, see the article in Supporting Evidence below which links to 1,000 peer reviewed medical papers on Covid-19 vaccine harms. 

Government databases around the world show OVER 4 MILLION adverse reactions have been reported from the vaccines, including many thousands of deaths, and hundreds of thousands of people who have suffered life changing illness and life-long disability.   And the true number of adverse event cases are likely to be significantly higher than what has been reported, as it was estimated long before Covid-19, that the numbers in these databases are under-reported by between 30% and 99%. 

Furthermore, because many doctors and scientists have been 'silenced', they are not able to share their research findings and clinical experience on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and treatments globally with other doctors, so many people presenting with new illnesses and symptoms since receiving Covid-19 vaccines, are either being gas-lighted and told that they are simply suffering from stress or anxiety; or the doctor keeps sending them for tests but can't find a diagnosis for the unusual symptoms in previously healthy people.  It is possible therefore, that many vaccine injuries are simply not being recognised by most doctors or their patients, hence they are not reported in official government reporting systems. 

There are numerous calls from doctors, scientists, lawyers and concerned citizens in all countries to completely stop the Covid-19 vaccines, pending thorough investigation of the alarming number of reports of injury and death from these drugs.

One study released by the German government (see link below), showed that the risk of a serious adverse event (i.e. death, long term hospitalization or permanent injury) from the vaccines, is 1 in 5,000 doses.  Therefore, if you have 3 jabs, you have a 1 in 1,667 chance of either dying or getting a serious and potentially life-long injury, from the jab. 

A later report in July 2023, as detailed in the video below of Dr Campbell, shows that in a study of 793 people in Switzerland who had the Moderna booster vaccine, one in 35 people had vaccine associated myocardial injury (i.e. heart damage). 

In the video, Dr Campbell states that if regulators around the world don't take notice of the information that he reveals via this paper, they are at best in his view negligent and at worst, he says ''I don't even want to think about it''.

We also provide a link below to Dr Campbell's YouTube channel, as Dr Campbell has been following and reporting on the science around Covid-19 since very early in the pandemic, so you may wish to view more of his easy to understand, unbiased, evidence based video reports.

There has been a limited amount of reporting in mainstream media about the vaccines causing blood clots and heart inflammation.  But these reports significantly downplay the true risks of the vaccines and the true level of injury and death being caused by these vaccines.  So you will not find the true data if you only get your news from the mainstream media TV and Radio channels and newspapers.

Many medical and scientific experts, and critical thinking people, are not entirely surprised by the unprecedented rate of injuries being caused by these experimental vaccines. This is because it usually takes at least 8 to 10 years for a new drug to be developed and fully tested ready for approval for use.  These vaccines were developed in less than a year.

Furthermore, the mRNA vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna, are new technologies which have never been used in humans before.  So we cannot assume that the Covid-19 vaccines are as safe as other vaccines for which we have a long history of use.  The Covid-19 vaccines are made using a completely new technology that is different to the way in which the other vaccines are made, and the way they work in the body is also completely different. 

To rush through the ‘emergency use authorization (EAU) for these new drugs, big pharma companies were allowed to skip many important safety tests.  For example the Pfizer vaccine has not been specifically tested on pregnant women, nor has it undergone all of the usual toxicology tests that would normally be required for a new drug to be fully approved.

You may also be interested to know that not all of the trials for these new drugs have been completed yet, with some of the trials scheduled for completion in 2023.  Pfizer also vaccinated the 'control group' from the trial (i.e., the group who were originally given the placebo product) after only two months, so now it is impossible to get any further data from the trial that shows the effects of the vaccinated group compared to those who didn't get the vaccine.

Have you ever wondered why our emergency services have been under such pressure since the vaccine rollout began?  These are not Covid-19 patients calling for the paramedics, they are mostly people suffering heart attacks, strokes, blood clots and neurological disorders, which are all now well-known side effects of the vaccines.

With just a little bit of online research you will see that there have been over 1,000 athletes in peak condition, simply dropping dead in the middle of games, in the swimming pool, during competition, whilst training, or dying in their sleep.  Sadly, this includes many young college athletes and even some school children.  You will also find videos and reports of dozens of TV presenters passing out around the world on camera, as well as musicians and performers collapsing on stage in the middle of performances. This is unprecedented in history and commenced after the vaccines first began to be rolled out globally. 

What is just as alarming as these collapses and deaths, is that the mainstream media has been largely silent on these incidents.  You can draw your own conclusions as to why the media does not think these unprecedented events should be reported to the public.

Also of great concern is the high rate of 'excess deaths' being reported in highly vaccinated countries, that are NOT Covid deaths.  This is the number of deaths over and above what the government and insurance company statisticians would expect in any given year.  These deaths are across all age groups, including young healthy, working age people, many of whom simply 'died suddenly'.  See Q5 below for more details on excess deaths. 

On non-mainstream and many social media channels, there are literally hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of reports on safety issues, deaths and injuries related to the Covid-19 vaccines.  There are also hundreds, if not thousands of groups and organizations who have formed since the vaccine rollout to investigate, analyze and report on the safety and efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines.  There are also many organizations which have formed, which seek to support the vaccine injured.

To help you get started on doing your own research into the safety of the vaccines, please see below under supporting evidence, a selection of articles, videos and reports which you may wish to view. 

We recommend viewing the documentary linked below, "Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion" which shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements while taking an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. The film highlights leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioral scientists in influencing policy, and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and open debate.

The film currently has more than 800,000 views on YouTube.

The article linked below by Steve Kirsch also provides a summary of evidence from numerous other sources including data from vaccine trial reports and government agencies, as well as further links to more information. 

In Useful Links we also suggest some organizations, government sites and other sources of information that you may wish to look into further, to help you form your own opinion on the safety and risks of the Covid-19 vaccines.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion
2. Steve Kirsch Newsletter: Sept 22, 2022 - Evidence of Harm
3. Dr Phillip Altman - The Time of Covid - August 2022
4. CDC 'Excess Death' Reports, Insurance Data Sounding MAJOR Alarm Bells
5. USA Senator Ron Johnson discusses VAERS data
6. German Government Shines Light on Severity of Vaccine Damage
7. CDC's Covid-19 Vaccine V-Safe Data Released Pursuant to Court Order
8. Vax Injuries -1000 Peer-reviewed Medical Papers

USEFUL LINKS:

1. Children's Health Defense
2. World Council for Health
3. Dr John Campbell YouTube channel
4. Vaccine Safety Research Foundation
5. Open VAERS -USA data on Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
6. UK Government - Summary of yellow card reporting on Covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions including deaths
7. Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) - Covid-19 vaccine safety report 12-01-23

Did you know that Pfizer discloses only 50% of the contents of their vaccine?   This means they can add whatever they like to the vial, with no need to disclose the full ingredients.  Could you imagine if your milk contained only 50% milk, and the farmers could add whatever they want to the other 50% and not tell you?  Would you buy that milk?  I doubt it, and yet people are getting injected with a drug, for which they don’t know 50% of the ingredients. What is contained in the undisclosed 50% and what are the potential side effects of these undisclosed ingredients?  Pfizer are not required to tell us and government regulators around the world have agreed that this is OK.

In the European Union, the MEPs who are the elected representatives of 450 million Europeans, don't know ANY of the ingredients, as despite their requests they have not been shown details in the Pfizer contract of the ingredients, or the trial data that shows safety and effectiveness of the vaccine. Furthermore, contracts were signed with Pfizer for 4.5 billion doses of the vaccine, enough for 10 doses for every man, woman, child and baby.  

Furthermore, a number of scientists who have anlaysed various batches of vaccines have raised concerns that the ingredients vary from batch to batch.

A Pfizer representative also admitted in October 2022, during questioning in the EU parliament, that Pfizer did not even test whether their vaccine could stop transmission during their trials.  This means the regulators approved the use of these drugs; told us they would 'stop the spread', and then coerced the entire population through mandates, vaccine passports and other restrictions to take the vaccines, even though there was no scientific evidence that the vaccine could stop transmission.

Any reasonable person would surely question how our governments can assure us that these drugs are safe, when even they don't even know the full contents of these products.  It seems we are expected to simply trust big Pharma and the regulators, who have clearly lied to us.  The shocking admission by Pfizer about not testing their vaccine for transmission, has left many wondering what else we have not been told.

   

The public was tricked into believing the Covid-19 'vaccines' were 'approved'.  They are not 'approved'.  In each country they fall under either a 'provisional approval' or 'emergency use' approval. 
 
There is a huge difference between this type of approval, which is pending the finalization of research, and the difference is that they have not yet been proved to be fully safe and effective as claimed.  The manufacturers have been given up to 6 years to provide the outstanding safety and efficacy data, and already after more than 2 years of use world-wide we are seeing the highest rates of death and serious adverse events ever associated with any drug released in history.