Health

When the WHO declared a global health pandemic in early 2020, governments around the globe worked in lockstep to respond. Mainstream TV, radio and newspaper channels were funded by governments and large corporations, to report policies and mandates which we were told were necessary to protect us all from a deadly virus.

But there is no doubt that the Covid19 response measures imposed by our governments, have led to numerous domestic and international human rights violations, and caused significant damage to people’s physical, mental, financial, and social well-being. Evidence of the damage caused, is expanding every week, as more and more people raise concerns, and more and more medical experts, scientists and economists speak out with real world data.

But as you will see on review of some of the supporting evidence provided on this website, sadly, many of these experts who are speaking out about the dangers of the vaccines and other government measures, have been 'silenced' in various ways by governments, mainstream media and big tech companies. You may be aware of the files recently exposed by Twitter, which revealed significant coercion by various government agencies such as the FBI, who pressured Twitter management to remove accounts of experts who posted factual information that the government did not want you to see. This is why many people have only heard the 'narrative' agreed by governments and big corporations globally.

Some of the impacts of the pandemic response, will not be fully known for decades, as there is no way of knowing the long-term health effects of the experimental vaccines that people were coerced to take, nor the long-term impacts of lockdowns and other measures, on the development and social well-being of our children and young people.

This website seeks to provide information to answer the 6 key questions below, in relation to the Covid19 pandemic and the response of governments around the world

After reading the information provided and doing your own research, you can determine the answers to these questions for yourself!

1. Was there really a‘pandemic’– what were the risks of Covid 19, who were at risk, and were there any treatments available?

SEE FACTS & EVIDENCE

2. Are the Covid 19 vaccinessafe?

SEE FACTS & EVIDENCE

3. Are the Covid 19 vaccineseffective?

SEE FACTS & EVIDENCE

4. Werepandemic responsessuch as testing, masking, social distancing, lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations effective, and the only way out?

SEE FACTS & EVIDENCE

5. Should westop the vaccinesnow and end all Covid related restrictions?

SEE FACTS & EVIDENCE

6. What are the future impactslikely to come from the pandemic response measures?

SEE FACTS & EVIDENCE

Q1. Was there really a ’Pandemic’ - what were the risks of Covid 19, who were at risk, and were there any treatments available?

Based on the facts listed below and your own investigations, you can draw your own conclusions as to whether the WHO declared the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’ because of a serious threat to global health, or whether there may have been other motives for this declaration, which our governments used to take unprecedented levels of control over our livelihoods, our personal health choices and our way of life.

Before you start reviewing the facts below in detail, consider the information in the graphic below for a minute. The data in the graph shown is extracted from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and Our World in Data, and although it covers Australia only, it gives a pretty good overview of the true risk of Covid-19 to people's lives around the world.

You can easily recreate this graph for your own country by checking your country's official statistics website and the 'Our World in Data' website.

You may also be interested to know that based on analysis of blood samples in storage, scientists found evidence that Covid-19 was circulating in Italy and many other countries as far back as August 2019; yet no-one really noticed, as it was not 'spreading' at alarming rates, and people were being successfully treated where necessary, as they would be for any other Covid illness, such as a bad Flu.

It is interesting that Covid-19 only became of concern, after it was 'announced', 8 months later in March 2020, by the WHO as being a 'pandemic', and the media and governments worldwide began their campaign to induce fear in the world population.

You may not be aware that hundreds of millions of people have been concerned (and protesting) worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic, about the measures being enforced by their governments. Many share the view of the gentleman in the following video clip from Fox news, that it seems like 'something else is going on here'.

'SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON': Dr. Fauci confronted by DC residents on vaccines

FACT: Covid 19 is not incredibly deadly with a similar fatality rate as the seasonal Flu

Infection Fatality Rate:

The survival rate for the flu across all ages is 99.998%, while the survival rate for Covid-19 is 99.99%.

To help understand the true fatality of a disease, we look at the infection fatality rate (IFR). The IFR represents the proportion of the people who die following an infection with SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19). As you will see at the first link listed under "Supporting Evidence" below (which further links to official US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organisation (WHO) data), the IFR of Covid-19 is very close to the IFR of Influenza (the Flu).

So why was a global pandemic called, with a response that was so significantly different to the way in which we deal with the Flu every year? Why did our government leaders and the mainstream media keep telling us that Covid-19 was so deadly, and that we needed to take such drastic measures to control it?

We have been living with corona viruses for decades. Colds and Flus are all “corona viruses” and our ability to recover from the virus depends on our own natural immune system.

It has always been the case that some people can, and do, die from these Corona viruses, if they have a weak immune system. Those with a weak immune system typically include elderly people and people of any age with serious underlying health conditions. The same demographic of people who die from influenza, like the elderly or those with other health conditions, die from Covid-19. In fact the statistics clearly show that most of the people who died from Covid-19 across the globe, were over the age of life expectancy, and had an average of 2 to 3 other serious health issues (co-morbidities).

Real World Evidence in February 2020 - The Diamond Princess:

There was clear data about the infection and fatality rate of Covid-19 in February 2020 when the Diamond Princess, a British-registered luxury and cruise ship, during a cruise of the Western Pacific, detected cases of COVID-19 on board. The vessel was quarantined off Japan for two weeks, after which all remaining passengers and crew were evacuated. Of the 3,711 people on board, 712 became infected with the virus – 567 of 2,666 passengers, and 145 of 1,045 crew. Figures for total deaths vary from early to later assessments, and because of difficulties in establishing causation. As many as 14 are reported to have died from the virus, all of them older passengers.

For anyone who has been on a cruise ship you would understand that this is the perfect breeding ground for the spread of a virus due to the extremely small and close living quarters and common areas for passengers. Also, the age range of passengers is generally heavily skewed to the older population, who are much more susceptible to severe outcomes from a virus. So the spread of Covid-19 in such an environment is likely to be a 'worst-case scenario' for transmission. Yet even in this scenario, less than 20% of those on board caught Covid-19 and of those, no more than 14 died - an overall mortality rate for those infected of 2%, but an overall mortality rate of about one-third of 1 % or a 99.6% recovery. And bear in mind that this would likely be much less in the general community with many more younger people who were not living in such close contact.

Why weren't we told about Vitamin D?

It was also widely known from the beginning of the pandemic that a very large percentage of those who became seriously ill with, or died from, Covid 19, were Vitamin D deficient (which is common for many people in the northern hemisphere during winter), so some simple guidance to check Vitamin D levels, would most likely have reduced the rate of serious illness or death significantly.

But the above facts about Covid-19 having a fatality rate and demographic impact similar to a bad Flu season, and that adequate Vitamin D levels can help to avoid infection or serious outcomes, is NOT what the mainstream media (MSM) reported. All over the world, the MSM in lockstep, reported the same horror stories of high case numbers, overwhelmed hospitals, and a high number of deaths. But what they did not tell you is how the data was manipulated to enable these horror stories to be created.

Manipulation of the Data to create FEAR:

Below are just some examples of how they 'created' the horror statistics that were used to induce fear in the global population:

1. The PCR test used to diagnose infection was not accurate and produced a high number of false positive results, which significantly overstated the number of true cases of infection (see separate FACT on this issue).

2. In the beginning of the pandemic, most countries were counting any death of someone who had Covid-19, as a 'Covid death'. So if someone was already dying of another disease; or went to hospital after an accident; or had numerous other illnesses, any one of which might have been their cause of death; when these people arrived at hospital, they were immediately tested for Covid. If the PCR test which cannot accurately diagnose any disease, showed they were positive, Covid-19 was listed as the cause of death on their death certificate and reported by the media in the total of Covid death numbers.

This manipulation of the death numbers was uncovered when a man died of a gunshot wound, but tested positive for Covid-19 when he arrived at hospital, so he was counted as a 'Covid-19' death. Once the public became aware of this manipulative reporting of the numbers, governments changed their reporting method, and started reporting those who died 'from' Covid, instead of those who died 'with' Covid.

Do you remember that change in language? It happened simultaneously around the world, but most people would not have noticed. But pay careful attention in future for this distinction in the language, when listening to reports or reviewing Covid-19 hospitalization and death data, as it is very significant to understanding the true risk and impact of Covid-19 on the health of nations.

3. See the report from Finland under supporting evidence below, exposing the fraudulent Covid-19 death count. According to Sirkka Goebeler, chief specialist at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Covid-19 has not been the actual cause of death in up to 40 percent of fatalities attributed to the illness in Finland. The article goes on to say: "The Finnish report further substantiates the complaints of statistical analysts and public health experts that there was a failure to differentiate between deaths from Covid and deaths with Covid during the pandemic. There is evidence that in the United States the conflation was deliberate in order to drive and perpetuate a state of public alarm. The most obvious red flags were that approximately 95% of Covid mortalities had multiple serious co-morbidities and the average age of death was around life expectancy. CDC statistics show that 95% of Covid-related deaths list an average of 4 comorbidities, while 5% list Covid as the only known cause of death. Such co-morbidities include cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), and cancer (5.6%). The average age of Covid-related death is 77 years old."

4. It took 3 years, but some mainstream media has finally started reporting the truth that the Covid deaths have been overcounted. Please see The Washington Post op-ed published on January 13, 2023 titled "We are over-counting covid deaths and hospitalisations. That's a problem". The columnist writes "We are overcounting COVID deaths....Since every hospitalized patient gets tested for COVID....a gunshot victim or someone who had a heart attack, for example, could test positive...".

Given how long this fact has been known, it begs the question as to why it took the MSM 3 years to report this very crucial fact, as it was the high death rate being reported by the MSM which generated the fear amongst the public, and which was a key reason that the WHO declared a pandemic.

5. There have been numerous examples reported in many countries of how the Covid-19 infection, hospitalisation and death data is being manipulated by governments and the MSM, to support the Covid-19 narrative, not just in relation to the risks of infection, but also the claim that the vaccines are 'safe and effective' (see further FACTS on these topics on this website).

One such report can be found in the video below by former Australian MP Craig Kelly in January 2023 "Statistical Fraud by NSW Health".

Mr. Kelly states "Embarrassed by the data showing our hospitals were full of quadruple vaxxed people with Covid and not a single vaccine free person was in hospital with Covid-19, NSW Health decided to hide the data by no longer reporting it in their weekly Covid Surveillance Reports. And now they have resorted to statistical fraud in their 'hospitalisation by vaccine status' reporting by combining the 'unvaccinated' and 'no information' categories together. This is despite NSW Health previously stating that those in hospitalised and in 'no information' category as to their vaccination status "are likely to have received at least one dose". So this both hides the fact that there are zero unvaccinated people in hospital with Covid and understates the percentage of the quadruple vaccinated in hospital. Its' a complete sham by vaccine fanatics that refuse to admit their assertions of 'safe & effective' was a lie, that are now deliberately trying to mislead the public."

6. None of the MSM reporting on Covid-19 death, hospitalisation and infection rates was ever compared to other causes of illness and death. For example, google how many people are hospitalized each year in your country and from what causes. Or research how many people die in your country each year, or each day, and from what causes. Then compare those numbers to the Covid-19 hospitalization and death numbers that you were hearing in the news. You will find that there are other causes of death much higher than Covid-19 that our health authorities should have been far more focused on than Covid-19, especially since most Covid-19 deaths were in people who were older than life expectancy age, and /or who had multiple other serious health conditions. For example, in the UK, before Covid, about 600,000 people died each year or about 1,700 per day from all causes. Compare that to the number of people who died 'from' Covid (not 'with' Covid) which you can find within the information at links below.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

Our World In Data

Man Shot Dead Counted and Reported as Covid Death

January 2023 - Former Australian MP Craig Kelly - Statistical Fraud by NSW Health

FACT: The PCR test cannot effectively diagnose Covid-19

The inventor of the PCR test, Nobel Prize winner Dr Kary Mullis, is on record as saying that you cannot interpret the results of the PCR test to diagnose disease.

Dr Mullis stated "It doesn't tell you that you're sick or that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you in any way", "With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody". Please see links to videos of Dr Kari Mullis below.

Sadly in August 2019, just months before Covid-19 was declared a pandemic, Kary Mullis suddenly died, so he was unable to speak out about how PCR test results were misused to diagnose Covid-19 infection.

There are a number of reasons why the PCR test is not fit to diagnose Covid-19 infection. Here are three of the key reasons.

Firstly the PCR test cannot distinguish between a live cell and a dead cell.

Secondly, it may detect other Corona virus cells such as Influenza A or B, falsely recorded as Covid-19 (see video at link below for an explanation of how the PCR test works and why this is true).

This means that if you were sick and since recovered from Covid-19 or influenza, the test would produce a positive result for Covid-19, even though the cells may be dead and of a different corona virus (cold or influenza). But these false positive results were used as 'proof' by the government that you were sick and infectious with Covid-19, when in fact you were not.

Did you or anyone you know test positive for Covid-19 and had to quarantine, yet never developed any symptoms? Even if you did develop symptoms, it could have been another type of corona virus such as a cold or influenza.

Thirdly, the way the PCR test works is that it runs a number of 'cycles', with each cycle effectively magnifying cells. Above 35 cycles, it is well known that you can find just about any type of cell for any illness as the test is magnifying minute particles that exist within us all. And yet, all countries ran the test at cycles well above 35. It almost seems as if they wanted to find Covid-19 virus in everyone.

The above facts are well documented and well known by scientists. Government regulators have also admitted the PCR tests are not fit to test whether or not someone is infected with Covid-19.

For example, the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) eventually removed the PCR test in July 2021, because they had to admit that it gives a very high number of ‘false’ positives. Yet many governments such as Australia are still using them to convince people that they have Covid-19, or to declare deaths as 'Covid-19' deaths, even though the Australian regulator, TGA, admitted that the PCR test cannot distinguish between a live and dead cell.

These false positive test results have been used to increase and maintain fear amongst the population, as they have used false positive PCR test results to convince healthy people that they are sick, and also they have been used to report inflated numbers of Covid cases and Covid deaths (see more details on the false reporting in question 4 below).

Please see blow a video by Dr Derek Knauss, a clinical lab scientist who tested 1500 'supposed' positive Covid-19 samples collected in Southern California. He found NO Covid-19 in any of the 1500 samples. What they found instead was that mostly all of the samples were Influenza A and some were Influenza B. He also sent the samples to other university laboratories and they also found the same results - Influenza A and B, but NO Covid.

He then explains how he asked the US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) for samples of Covid-19, and they responded that they did not have any samples. He states "we have now come to the firm conclusion, through all of our research and lab work, that Covid-19 was imaginary and fictitious, the Flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead had comorbidities such as heart disease cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc., then they got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid-19 to work with. "We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid-19 fraud...."

The claims made by Dr Knauss are supported by numerous other scientists and doctors globally, who also believe that the Flu (albeit a bad flu initially) was simply relabeled Covid , and that there are many other factors that contributed to the numbers of 'Covid-19' infections, hospitalizations and deaths that were reported in the MSM. Most of these contributing factors are discussed throughout this website, so please take the time to review all facts presented before drawing your final conclusions.

Whilst we encourage you to do your own research, please find below some articles and videos to get you started on the topics of the PCR test and its inventor, Dr Kary Mullins; as well as the manipulation of Covid statistics.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Disarming the PCR Test - The Unfair Isolation of Healthy People - THiNKTWICE.GLOBAL

US National Institute of Health's Dr Fauci on PCR Testing

Dr Derek Knauss - Analysis of 1500 PCR positive test results - the Flu was relabeled Covid-19

FACT: Natural Immunity protects and not everyone has equal chance of contracting Covid-19

You may have seen articles about people who never seem to catch Covid 19. This is because many people have cross immunity from previous Corona viruses such as cold and flu. Also, there are many research papers that show that natural immunity gained by catching Covid 19 and recovering, gives higher protection than the so-called vaccines. See some of the evidence at the links below.

Further evidence that not everyone will contract Covid-19 can be found in a trial conducted by the Imperial College of London very early in the pandemic.

In the trial, 36 healthy male and female volunteers aged 18-30 years, unvaccinated against COVID-19 and with no prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 were given a low dose of the virus – introduced via drops up the nose – and then carefully monitored by clinical staff in a controlled environment over a two-week period. The study used virus from very early in the pandemic obtained from a hospitalized patient in the ISARIC-4C study, prior to the emergence of the Alpha variant. Only eighteen of the volunteers became infected, 16 of whom went on to develop mild-to-moderate cold-like symptoms, including a stuffy or runny nose, sneezing, and a sore throat. Some experienced headaches, muscle/joint aches, tiredness and fever. None developed serious symptoms

It should be noted that 16 of the 34 participants (i.e., 47%) did not get infected despite direct exposure up the nose. Some had detectable virus in their nose but did not go on to test positive twice on PCR tests, the threshold the team used for confirmed infection.

Prior to the Covid pandemic, it was well understood, not just by the medical and scientific community, but also by most of the general public, that we are all born with a natural immune system that is working 24 x 7 to protect us from both catching and recovering from, all sorts of illnesses and viruses. Yet for some reason when the pandemic struck, decades of common knowledge about our body's own natural immune system was not only dismissed, but anyone who tried to remind us of this very powerful protection that is within us all, were demonized and 'silenced', as the official narrative pushed the need for vaccines for everyone, regardless of age, health or risk factors of each individual.

One of the studies, a retrospective observational study of 124,500 individuals, conducted during the Delta wave, compared people who had not been previously infected and received 2 doses of the Pfizer 'vaccine', with previously infected individuals who had not been vaccinated. The study showed that those who had been vaccinated had a 13-fold greater chance of breakthrough infection, compared to re-infection in the non-vaccinated group. The conclusion of the study authors was: 'Natural acquired immunity confers stronger protection against infection and symptomatic disease caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2-2 (Pfizer Covid-19 'vaccine') dose vaccine-induced immunity'.

The findings of this study is backed up by many doctors and scientists globally, including Australian Clinical Trial and Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs Consultant, Dr Phillip M Altman, who states in his paper 'The Time of Covid' in August 2022: "Natural immunity plays an important role in Covid-19. There is no evidence to suggest that Covid-19 gene-based 'vaccination'offers superior protection from Covid-19 as compared to natural immunity. Indeed, many believe the reverse is true'.

You can easily find hundreds of papers, videos and articles on the important role of natural immunity in fighting all disease and illness, including Covid-19. Below we provide a small sample of such references to get you started in your research. Please review this supporting evidence and draw your own conclusions as to the level of risk that Covid poses to healthy people, both in contracting the virus, and their chances of recovering through natural immunity if they do become ill.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

FACT: Different age groups are at different risks from Covid 19 infection

The old are 1,000 times more at risk of being infected with Covid 19 than the young, just as they are with Influenza and most other diseases.

In the USA, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) statistics show that 95% of Covid-related deaths list an average of 4 comorbidities (other serious health conditions), while 5% list Covid as the only known cause of death. Such comorbidities include cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), and cancer (5.6%). The average age of Covid-related death is 77 years old.

These factors are similar in other countries, which show that most people who die from Covid-19 are over the age of life expectancy and have on average at least 2 to 3 other serious underlying health issues.

It was also well known at the beginning of the pandemic, that a large percentage of people who were hospitalized with Covid 19, were Vitamin D deficient, which is common for many people during winter in the Northern hemisphere.

Please see the table below, which shows the infection fatality rate (IFR) of Covid-19 by age group. Overall, you can see that this is a disease with a 99.94% recovery rate (at the time of this study, but latest data now shows a 99.99% recovery rate), which is very similar to the recovery rate for the annual flu.

Children and young people under 30 have an almost zero chance of dying from Covid, or even becoming seriously ill. We have not been able to find one case in the world where a healthy child with no other underlying health condition has died of Covid 19. And if they do become infected, the evidence shows that they will have a good level of natural immunity against future infection. So it is difficult to understand any reason to vaccinate young, healthy children and adults with an experimental 'vaccine' with no long term safety data, when they have virtually zero risk of dying from Covid.

Even those in the 30-39 year old age group have a 99.99% recovery rate, 40-49 year olds - 99.97%; 50-59 year olds - 99.87%; and 60-69 year olds - 99.5% recovery rate. The data clearly shows that Covid-19 has the highest impact on the elderly, as do all other Corona viruses such as Colds and Flu's.

There was clear data about the infection and fatality rate of Covid-19 in February 2020 when the Diamond Princess, a British-registered luxury and cruise ship, during a cruise of the Western Pacific, detected cases of COVID-19 on board. The vessel was quarantined off Japan for two weeks, after which all remaining passengers and crew were evacuated. Of the 3,711 people on board, 712 became infected with the virus – 567 of 2,666 passengers, and 145 of 1,045 crew. Figures for total deaths vary from early to later assessments, and because of difficulties in establishing causation. As many as 14 are reported to have died from the virus, all of them older passengers.

For anyone who has been on a cruise ship you would understand that this is the perfect breeding ground for the spread of a virus due to the extremely small and close living quarters and common areas for passengers. Also, the age range of passengers is generally heavily skewed to the older population, who are much more susceptible to severe outcomes from a virus. So the spread of Covid-19 in such an environment is likely to be a 'worst-case scenario' for transmission.

Yet even in this scenario, less than 20% of those on board caught Covid-19 and of those, no more than 14 died - an overall mortality rate for those infected of 2%, but an overall mortality rate of about one-third of 1 % or a 99.6% recovery. And bear in mind that this would likely be much less in the general community with many more younger people who were not living in such close contact. So these statistics from February 2020 show clearly that only the elderly were likely to die from Covid-19 and that the fatality rate was no worse than the Flu.

Even though these facts were well known very early in the pandemic, the experimental vaccines have been, and continue to be, injected into children and young people in many countries. Some countries like the USA have even started injecting babies from 6 months old.

You should note; however, that Authorities around the world are finally starting to admit these facts, as many countries have restricted Covid-19 vaccinations for children and young people under 30 years old, some countries have stopped vaccinating low risk under 50 year olds, and some countries in Europe have withdrawn approval for vaccinating children under 18 years. These withdrawals have been due to mounting evidence of heart inflammation and other serious side effects of the vaccines. For children and young people with such a low risk of serious outcomes from Covid-19, these often serious, and in some cases life threatening vaccine side effects, pose a far greater risk than catching Covid-19.

As more and more people become aware of these significant risks, there has been a marked decrease in the number of people willing to take the vaccines, as evidenced by reports of a number of countries having to dispose of excess stock.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

FACT: Healthy children & young adults have zero risk of death or serious harm from Covid but they are at risk of serious adverse events from the Vaccines

Globally, there are tens of thousands of ethical doctors, scientists, and lawyers, as well as millions of concerned citizens, all calling for governments to STOP vaccinating children and pregnant women against Covid-19 (see more information and evidence on this at Q5 below).

This is because there is no evidence that children are at serious risk of hospitalization or death from Covid-19. In fact, many studies and analyses of the trial data used to obtain EUA (Emergency Use Approval) for the Covid-19 vaccine for children, show a significantly higher risk of death or serious injury from the vaccines, compared to the virus. We have not been able to find one case worldwide of a healthy child dying from Covid-19, and yet 31* children are reported dead in connection with their Covid-19 vaccines on the USA's Center for Disease Control (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The CDC denies causality. *Note: The Report at the link below quotes 14 deaths of children based on an earlier period, which has risen to 31 deaths as at late 2022 and this number continues to rise.

Did you know that one of the children in the original Pfizer trial for children, Maddie de Garay from the USA, had serious adverse reactions to the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, which have severely impacted her health for life. Pfizer responded by excluding her from the trial results, which means the severity of her side effects were not reported in the data that was provided to government regulators for approval of the vaccines. Maddie's mother reported that she was not advised of the potential side effects that her daughter suffered at the time that she entered the trial, even though these same side effects had been reported by adults who had received the vaccine.

Maddie's story is well-known by those who have been following the real world data; data which is not reported on the mainstream news, as Maddie and her mother have presented her case to the US Senate. Yet there has been no follow up or support for Maddie and her family and no consequences for Pfizer for excluding this information from the trial report data. This case begs the question as to why didn't the mainstream media report this information? Don't you think that parents around the world have the right to know that this is a possible risk for their child if they give them the vaccine?

You may recall that the original reason why our governments encouraged children to get vaccinated was to protect elderly or vulnerable family members. But it is now widely accepted that the vaccines do not prevent anyone from becoming infected or transmitting the virus, and yet regulators around the world continue to promote the Covid-19 vaccines for children, even though they are at virtually zero risk of serious outcomes from Covid-19. For those who can't see for themselves that these vaccines do not prevent transmission, please see the video contained in the next FACT on this site below of a European MEP who asked a Pfizer Executive in a EU session in mid October 2022, whether Pfizer tested their C-19 vaccine to determine whether it could stop transmission of the virus. The answer she gave was 'No'. So the push for everyone to get vaccinated to protect others, was a blatant lie by our governments. Why was this serious discovery not reported anywhere in the world by mainstream media? Why was this very important information hidden from the public?

It has been suggested by a number of organizations, that the reason for the push to approve the Covid 19 vaccinations for children is due to legal indemnity laws. It seems that in some countries such as the USA, if the vaccines are approved for children and added to the annual child vaccination program, it gives the Pharmaceutical companies protection against liability for any harm their vaccines may cause to anyone of any age . Sadly, in October 2022, the US government did in fact approve for the Covid-19 vaccines to be added to the annual childhood vaccine schedule. Many are afraid that in some states this approval could lead to children being forced to be vaccinated with these experimental products in order to go to school. There are many ethical doctors and lawyers fighting to have this decision overturned. See evidence below on this matter.

Those who have been following the true science and the real world data, are very concerned about the harms that the Covid-19 vaccines are causing and may cause in the future, not only to the children who are vaccinated, but also to the children born to women who are vaccinated either before, or during pregnancy. There have been no published safety studies for the Covid 19 mRNA vaccines conducted specifically on pregnant women, and there is no way of knowing with any certainty at this point in time, what if any, effects the vaccines may cause for future generations.

What we do know; however, is that there have been many reports from doctors around the world, that in vaccinated women, there has been a significant increase in the rates of sudden miscarriages as well as still births. This raises important safety signals that should be investigated by government regulators to determine if these cases are linked to the experimental vaccines. Please see more on this issue in supporting evidence below.

Sadly, in spite of very minimal testing, many countries have already given emergency use or provisional approval of the Covid-19 vaccines for children and even babies. This is in spite of the almost zero risk from Covid, as well as calls from thousands of experienced medical experts, scientists and legal professionals, as well as millions of concerned citizens worldwide NOT to approve these vaccines for children.

USEFUL LINKS:

Maddie de Garay - 12 Year Old Pfizer Trial Participant

Robert F Kennedy Jr on Maddie de Garay and Vax for Children

Alarming Stillbirth Data – ‘Irrefutable Evidence The Vaccine Is Killing My Patients’ – Dr. Thorp

Parents Are Watching - Protect the Children - April 2022

Dr Chris Martenson - Massive Consequences Should be Coming for Those Who Were Beyond Negligent in Giving These Shots to Pregnant Woman & Children

FACT: The vaccines cannot stop the spread of Covid-19 and there is NO evidence that the vaccines have saved millions of lives as reported on MSM

As we see right now all around the world, the vaccines do not prevent contracting or spreading Covid-19 (which was the reason the government originally gave for forcing mandates).

The lie that we all needed to be vaccinated to protect the elderly and vulnerable, has now been fully exposed in the European parliament. For those who can't see around them that these vaccines do not prevent transmission, please see the video link below of a European MEP who asked a Pfizer Executive in a EU session in mid October 2022, whether Pfizer tested their C-19 vaccine to determine whether it could stop transmission of the virus. The answer she gave was 'No'. So the push for everyone to get vaccinated to protect others, was a blatant lie by our governments. Why was the exposure of this important fact in the EU parliament not reported anywhere in the world by mainstream media? Why was this very important information hidden from the public?

Before this lie was exposed in October 2022, governments around the world had already changed their message from we all need to get vaccinated to 'stop the spread', to promoting that the vaccines are 'effective in preventing serious illness or death', but there is no evidence of this either, particularly since more people, most of whom are double or triple ore even quadruple jabbed, are dying now from Covid-19, than during 2020 before the vaccines existed.

So if anyone tries to tell you ''but the vaccines have saved millions of lives", we would strongly recommend that you watch the video 'Before and After' at the link below, which shows the results of a definitive study of the impact of the Covid-19 vaccines on every country in the world.

This data shows compelling evidence, based on real world vaccine deaths data, that post-vaccination Covid deaths have been 75% higher in the year since the vaccine roll-out across the globe. All but a handful of nations have suffered with higher Covid-19 death rates post-vaccination. But the countries that have suffered the most are those that have the highest rates of vaccination and associated vaccine mandates.

Do not simply believe the information reported in the video, you can check the data for yourself. We also provide a useful link to 'Our World in Data' where you can look up the raw data for yourself for each country.

Our governments knew, or should have known, that these vaccines could not prevent the spread of Covid-19, as there has existed for many years, the clear scientific evidence that proves this fact.

Due to the way in which the ‘vaccines’ were designed, it is not possible for them to prevent anyone from catching or spreading Covid-19. Watch the following video of Australian Professor Edward J Steele, Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist, who explains scientifically why a vaccine in the arm cannot stop a respiratory virus. In his own words he concludes "I want to say it emphatically and I'll take on all comers on this one - it can't work!!

Evidence of this fact was also presented to the Australian Parliament in August 2022 by Senator Gerard Rennick. He also pointed out that it was never possible for these vaccines to stop the spread of the virus, and all governments and their health regulatory bodies had this information at the time that they approved the vaccines and mandated them to be given to the population to ‘stop the spread’. This is either gross incompetence or a blatant lie told by governments all around the world.

The fact that the vaccines do not stop the spread, is further supported by real world data that clearly shows that countries with higher vaccination rates, now have higher Covid-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths, compared to countries with lower vaccination rates.

It is important to understand that our governments and regulators have NOT been telling us the truth! We know this because each time one of their lies is exposed by ethical politicians or concerned citizens, they simply change the narrative.

Think about it! They told us we all need to be vaccinated to protect the old, the vulnerable and each other from infection or transmission. When it was finally undeniable that the vaccines don't work as traditional vaccines (because they are not traditional vaccines), the narrative changed to say that we need to get vaccinated to protect ourselves from severe illness or death. But there is no evidence that the vaccines do that either! More vaccinated people are dying now from Covid-19, than unvaccinated deaths before the vaccines, so where is the evidence that the vaccines are protecting anyone from anything?

Another example of a lie uncovered, is when people discovered that the Covid-19 cases and death numbers included those dying of other causes, who also had a positive PCR test for Covid 19; the narrative changed to reporting cases and deaths 'from' Covid, instead of 'with' Covid.

You will also notice all around the world, that as countries draw close to any government elections, restrictions and mandates seem to be lifted, even though the Covid case numbers haven't changed.

The only way to know the truth is to find it for yourselves. Please look into the evidence below in more detail to find the answers. You may also want to consider how much of your information you obtain from the government and mainstream media. At the very least, you need to ask your government leaders for the evidence upon which their policies are based. You may be surprised to find that the evidence that you assumed they had, does not in fact exist. And if you let them, they will just keep changing the narrative, without being held accountable for what is at best incompetence, and at worst, blatant lies for motives that are yet to be determined. Either way, their policies and mandates have had serious harmful impacts on people and society at many levels.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Before and After - Covid-19 death rates for each country before and after vaccination programs

USEFUL LINKS:

Our World in Data

MP Rob Roos Questions Pfizer in EU Parliament on whether they Tested the Vaccine to Prevent Transmission of Covid-19

Professor Steele, Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist - The Covid vaccines put in the arm CAN'T WORK!!

December 2022 - German MEP Christine Anderson questions big pharma in EU parliament - Who lied about the vaccines?

FACT: Effective Treatments for Covid 19 have been suppressed since the beginning of the 'pandemic' declaration

YES, there were a number of known, very effective, low-cost drugs that were available to treat Covid-19 from the outset.

Two treatments in particular - Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, had very good safety data over many decades. The discovery of Ivermectin even won a Nobel prize as it is such an effective, safe drug.

See the table in the evidence below that shows the safety of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and other traditional vaccines compared to the Covid-19 vaccines. The regulators will say that the numbers show significantly higher deaths from Covid-19 vaccines because so many people were vaccinated. But that is not a valid argument as the Covid vaccines, which have only been in use since mid 2021, show ten times more reported deaths compared to ALL other vaccines combined, over many decades.

There are also many vitamins and natural treatments that are very effective in boosting your natural immune system, such as Vitamin C, Vitamin D and Zinc. Boosting your own natural immunity is an important protection against contracting any illness, including Covid-19. Also bear in mind, that many of the people who were hospitalized or died with Covid-19 were found to be Vitamin D deficient. Vitamin D is a very important vitamin for a well-functioning immune system.

At the beginning of the pandemic, many doctors developed effective treatment protocols for Covid-19 using these drugs and supplements, as well as many others, with a very high success rate in preventing hospitalization and death.

All of the doctors who spoke out about these treatments also explained that the key to success was early treatment of Covid-19, i.e. to begin treatment as soon as symptoms arose; or even to administer some of these products prior to symptoms arising in order to prevent contracting the virus, by boosting people's natural immune systems.

So why did Health Ministers in many countries around the world advise people who contracted Covid-19 to stay home, do nothing and wait until they couldn’t breathe before coming to the hospital for treatment? This advice has never been given for any disease in history, so why was this advice given in respect of Covid-19? Particularly when frontline doctors were advising the regulators that early treatment was critical to prevent hospitalization and death in Covid-19 patients.

Some countries and states handed out care packages to all of their population, so that as soon as they started to feel any symptoms, they could immediately take the treatments.

One well known case of this is Uttar Pradesh, the most populace state in India, with 240 million people. In June 2021, their health officials started using a number of drugs including Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid 19. They went from a peak number of cases of 34,455 on 29 April 2021 to 178 cases on 26 June 2021. A year later there is an average of one death per day. Clearly these drugs work in treating Covid-19 – a test group of 240 million people should be enough proof!

Yet in spite of the success of treatments using these cheap drugs, many governments around the world systematically either banned the use of these drugs or prevented doctors from prescribing the drugs to their patients.

Furthermore, those ethical doctors who fought for their patients, by continuing to use these treatments based on their own clinical frontline experience that these drugs were saving lives, were persecuted by regulatory bodies, who discredited both them and the drugs. In many cases, these brave, experienced doctors, many of whom were leaders in their field, had their licenses suspended or cancelled. See articles below with further details.

Ivermectin in particular was being labelled by mainstream media as a 'horse de-wormer' as this drug is used for both humans and animals. But this was clearly a smear campaign to prevent people from asking their doctors for this treatment. There are numerous well researched, peer reviewed scientific papers on the safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating Covid-19, as you will see in the Supporting Evidence below.

In particular please take the time to watch the video 'The Ivermectin Story and Corruption around Suppressing its' Use to Save Lives'. It is extremely difficult to understand why the 'pandemic' was allowed to continue, once the evidence that is presented in this video became available to regulators around the world. Even if you read or watch nothing further on this website, PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO! It is very telling of what really caused the 'pandemic'.

Please also watch the video from Dr Kory, who exposes the fraudulent trials published to discredit Ivermectin. Sadly the captured mainstream media only reported the results of the fraudulent trials, and not the many, many Ivermectin trials that showed how incredibly effective Ivermectin is in treating Covid-19.

You will also find below other details of the lengths that the US and Australian governments in particular went to, to prevent the use of both Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. Please review this important information below.

If you still have any doubt that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for Covid, which could have saved tens of thousands of live, please watch the video below "Saving Lives with Ivermectin", a son's personal account of how he fought the system to treat his father with Ivermectin and saved his life.

Then watch the video in which Dr Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the USA, who referred to himself as 'the science' for all things Covid, advised that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine do nothing for Covid. Dr Fauci, a bureaucrat who does not treat patients, ignored frontline doctors who were saving lives with Ivermectin. Do you think his advice was well founded and responsible? If you watch the video below FDA Backflips on Ivermectin, it certainly does seem that Dr Fauci was wrong, the frontline doctors were right, and sadly, many lives were lost unnecessarily due to bureaucrats interfering in the doctor's treatment of their patients.

You may well ask, why would the government regulators interfere with a doctor's clinical experience and prevent them from using safe, effective treatments?

The answer is simply this: in order for the new Covid-19 vaccines to be approved under 'Emergency Use Approval (EUA)' or 'Provisional approval' regulations, there cannot exist any other effective treatment. This is because EUA or provisional approvals do not require the same level of testing of the new drugs, as would normally be required under regular approval. The theory is that although the testing is not complete and therefore, we don't really know the full safety profile of the drugs or the long-term side effects, we are in an ‘emergency’ situation and there are no other treatments. So, it is considered that taking the extra risks of approving new, experimental drugs is warranted, since there is no other option for treatment. As the government regulators were very motivated to get the entire world vaccinated, these safe treatments that were already available, would have put an end to bringing these new, experimental drugs to market.

You many also be interested to know that most of the funding of the health regulatory bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO), comes from the big pharmaceutical companies and other private organizations, all of whom profited handsomely from the sale of the vaccines. This leaves many to question whether these regulators were in fact serving the interests of the public, or the interests of those who fund them. It is also understood that at least some of those who made decisions to approve the vaccines, also have financial interests in the sale of the vaccines, either directly or indirectly.

Please review the supporting evidence below to form your own opinion as to whether there were other, safer, more effective treatments that would have potentially eliminated the call for Covid-19 to be classified as a 'pandemic'.

You can also find more information on this topic at Q4 below, under 'Fact: Covid-19 was Treatable from Day 1 with safe existing drugs, so vaccines were not the only way out of the 'pandemic', even if they had worked'.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Dr Chris Shoemaker - Scientists spent 15 years to find that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses

Jimmy Dore on Ivermectin

Saving Lives With Ivermectin

Fauci claims Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine cannot treat Covid

FDA Backflips on Ivermectin - November 2022

FACT: Compelling Evidence exists that Pandemics are Planned & are part of a 10 year Agenda of the World Health Organization

Hundreds of millions of the world’s populations - amongst whom are the most intelligent, bravest, creative and caring of all of humanity, believe that C0VID is a criminal operation.

Abundant evidence has been collected by world renowned lawyers that the Covid Pandemic has been planned. And legal cases and investigations have commenced in many countries, seeking to hold those who are responsible, accountable for crimes against humanity.

For example, were you aware that "Event 201" was held only months before the Covid pandemic was declared by the WHO. This event was a 'simulation' of a global corona virus pandemic. Could that simply be a co-incidence?

You may also be interested to know that the same people who conducted Event 201, have recently completed another simulation of the 'next pandemic' in 2026. Funny how they global powers know exactly when a pandemic will occur and what type of virus it will be. See the link below for a discussion by Redacted News on "It's starting, Bill Gates announces the next pandemic date and outbreak location".

Please go to the link 'Stop World Control' below and scroll down the home page of the website to find the video, "The Plan". This half hour video walks through many of the steps undertaken by global powers in the months and years before the announcement of the pandemic.

The website also provides a link to an in-depth evidence report collated by world renowned lawyers, doctors and scientists.

Countless lawyers, journalists, scientists, police officers, ethical politicians, physicians, nurses, and so many more brave, educated, people, are all firmly of the opinion, based on significant evidence, that C0VID is a criminal masterplan. More and more evidence is being revealed every day, more and more whistleblowers are coming forward, more and more people are coming to the conclusion that C0VID is an organized crime against humanity.

See the video below of US Senator Ron Johnson, who has held multiple Senate enquiries into the Covid pandemic and is extremely well informed about the true facts. He confirms Agenda 21 and warns that ''we need more Americans to listen to the truth, to be exposed to the truth, to pull their heads out of the sand quite honestly, open up their eyes and understand what is happening to this country. We are going down a very dangerous path, but it is a path that has been laid out and planned by an elite group of people that want to take total control over our lives...''

If you also watch the link to Dr Poornima Wagh, PHD Virology and Immunology, she explains why she has come to the conclusion that this was a PLANdemic, not a pandemic.

Dr Wagh has studied contents of ALL of the Covid-19 vaccines. She also discusses PCR tests, masks, and other topics. At the beginning of the video, she explains how if you look at World Bank data in 2017, 2018 & 2019 you will see that 120 countries were buying millions of dollars' worth of PCR Tests, gloves, and thermal thermometers used on the forehead, yet in 2016 there were zero purchases of these items.

Please watch the following video and the videos at the links below, to help you form your own opinion.

LINKS:

1. Stop World Control
2. Dr Poormina Wagh - Compelling evidence of a PLANdemic
3. Redacted News "It's Starting, Bill Gates announces the next pandemic date and outbreak location
4. They were researching Covid where? - YouTube

US Senator Ron Johnson Warns of Dangerous Path Planned by an Elite Group of People who want to Take Control Over Our Lives

Q2. Are the vaccines safe?

Based on the following information and your own investigations, you can draw your own conclusions as to whether the Covid-19 'vaccines' are, or ever were, 'safe'.

If you believe the vaccines are not safe, you may wish to consider following the advice of world leading cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough below, which is 'don't take any more shots' and express your concerns to your doctor, because "the doctors need to hear that 30 times a day before they start to get the message that the population doesn't think they're safe".

Fortunately many countries started to withdraw recommendations for vaccines in children in late 2022; and in April 2023, Switzerland withdrew Covid vaccine recommendations for all ages. If these vaccines are so 'safe and effective', why are some countries withdrawing them?

March 2023 - World Leading Cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough - Don't Take Any More Shots!

FACT: You can’t trust big pharmaceutical companies to tell the truth & we have a complete Healthcare system failure

You need to seriously consider how much you can trust information and drug trial results that are published by a drug company about their own products, from which they have made tens of billions of dollars in profits. They are very unlikely to publish any negative safety results or tell you that their products don’t really work very well, as that would reduce their sales and profits. Companies don’t exist to protect you and your family, they exist solely to make profits for their shareholders or owners.

Did you know that big pharmaceutical companies, some of whom are currently selling Covid-19 vaccines, have a history of paying billions of dollars in damages to people harmed and killed by their products? The courts ordered payment of these damages because the evidence showed that the companies knew that the products were unsafe, but they sold them anyway. This is likely because they did a 'cost benefit analysis' and determined that the cost of any lawsuits would be much less than the profits they would make from the sales.

As the saying goes, “if you want to know what is really going on, follow the money; if you want to know the truth, look to those who are being silenced”.

Please see several articles and videos below that provide some insight into how Big Pharma operates, to help you form your own opinion as to how much you are prepared to trust them with the health and lives of you and your family.

The video below of Robert F Kennedy Jr. interviewing UK Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra is particularly interesting, as they discuss Dr Malhotra's recent research on the Covid-19 vaccines, including the role of big Pharma throughout the pandemic and in its influence over the Health system in general.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

Our World In Data

How Corrupt is Big Pharma - Dr Aseem Malhotra - Leading UK Cardiologist

Dr Peter Gotzsche Exposes Big Pharma as Organized Crime

We Have A Complete Healthcare System Failure - Dr Malhotra - Sep 2022

Former Pharma Rep - Dispells Myth that Pharma Wants to Cure People

Dr Pierre Kory on Ivermectin and How Big Pharma Corrupted Science

FACT: The Vaccine rollout is a global experiment without ‘fully informed, voluntary consent’

A number of politicians around the world did state clearly at the beginning of the pandemic that the vaccine rollout was a global experiment, including Australia’s Chief Health Officer, Greg Hunt. But it was done rather quietly and never repeated again, and people were not told this fact at the time they were injected. This breaches laws around ‘fully informed consent’.

Prior to Covid-19 vaccines, it was unethical for any doctor to give any treatment to a patient without their ‘fully informed, voluntary consent’. In fact, in most countries doctors could lose their license to practice and be sued if they did so.

‘Fully informed’, means that patients must be told of the potential side effects of the drugs, and in the case of an experimental drug, they must also be clearly told that they are part of an experiment. Pfizer documents released under a Freedom of Information Request in the USA, revealed pages of known side effects of their Covid 19 vaccine, yet patients were not given this information before being injected, so that they could be ‘fully informed’.

‘Voluntary’ consent, means you cannot coerce someone to take a drug or treatment. Threatening loss of job (i.e. vaccine mandates) is a serious form of coercion.

So given that people were not told they were in an experiment, were not told of all potential side effects, and in many cases were coerced to take the vaccine under threat of losing their job and ability to pay their mortgage and feed their family if they did not do so, it was not possible for anyone to give fully informed, voluntary consent, prior to taking these drugs.

In some countries at different times after the injections were given, vaccines were then withdrawn due to risks of side effects. For example, in some countries AstraZeneca vaccine was stopped due to blood clots. Vaccines for children in a number of European countries have now been stopped due to risk of serious side effects (called adverse events).

The rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines breaks numerous domestic and international human rights laws including the Nuremberg Code, which was developed to ensure that the atrocities of World War II could never again be inflicted upon mankind. The Nuremburg Code specifically says that no-one can be forced to take an experimental treatment, yet this well-established law was ignored by all western countries.

Now many people have suffered side effects, life-long injuries or disabilities, and even lost loved ones, as a result of being vaccinated for Covid-19, many against their will. Information on the reports of 'adverse events' and deaths from the 'vaccines', is publicly available on government websites in most countries, as well as the WHO website. See links to some of these reporting databases below.

You may also wish to view the documentary "Uninformed Consent" linked below. This documentary provides an indepth look into the Covid-19 narrative of fear created by governments and public health officials, and how many people were coerced to take the vaccine without informed consent of the risk of potential side effects.

USEFUL LINKS:

Maajid Nawaz & Dr Peter McCullough on Informed Consent

Dec 2022: Australian Medical Professionals Society - Protection Without Politics

Nuremburg Code and Legal Proceedings for Crimes Against Humanity

FACT: Doctors, Scientists, other Experts and concerned citizens have been silenced globally and the mainstream media (MSM) is failing the people

It will likely come as a huge shock to most of the trusting public, that your doctors were 'silenced' from expressing any opinion about the Covid 19 vaccines that was different to the 'official narrative' of the vaccines being 'safe and effective'. Any doctor, scientist, lawyer or well-informed citizen who expressed concerns about the safety and effectiveness of these drugs, or who questioned the need to vaccinate healthy people who were not at serious risk from the Covid-19 virus, were the target of various actions to 'silence' their questions and concerns from being heard or shared.

Some of the actions that governments and regulators around the world used were:

1. Governments partnered with both mainstream media (MSM) channels, as well as social media and big tech companies like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, to ensure that ONLY the 'official narrative' would be reported, and to 'remove or suspend social media accounts of people who the 'fact checkers' decided were spreading misinformation. Many of those whose accounts were suspended or removed, were leading experts in their fields of medicine and science, yet medically unqualified 'fact-checkers' who were hired by big tech companies, were making decisions to shut down the opinions of these experts from being shared. This should be of grave concern to anyone who lives in a free democracy. Without freedom of speech, we cannot have freedom! Many of these experts were trying to warn people that the vaccines were not 100% safe, nor effective. No matter how much detailed scientific evidence and real world data these experts provided, they were still silenced. Please see video below from November 2022 where unconstitutional Federally directed censorship was fully exposed by US Senator Hawley, during questioning of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Please also watch the video at the first link below, to see just how badly the public broadcasters and MSM failed the people.

2. Government regulators sent letters to doctors and health professionals, effectively warning them that if they did not follow government policies such as mass vaccination, and advise their patients that the vaccines were safe and effective, that they would be sanctioned, including losing their license to practice. So your doctors in many countries were not permitted to use their own clinical experience or inform you of any concerns they may have had about the vaccines based on scientific evidence, or consider your individual health conditions and personal risk factors to determine whether or not you should take the vaccine. Many doctors who did ignore the threats from the regulators and put their patients first, did in fact suffer targeted attacks from their regulatory bodies, and many did in fact lose their license to practice.

Following is just one example, from Australia, of how Regulators silenced doctors in this way. The letter below was sent to medical practitioners in Australia, by AMPS, a group of ethical medical practitioners who spoke out against the medical tyranny imposed by the Australian government.

You will see in the letter that they refer to a joint statement issued by Australia's medical regulator AHPRA, and National Medical Boards, threatening regulatory action "for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims, including on social media".

As the letter also points out, this threat was issued contrary to the Doctors' duty to warn patients of any material risks associated with the treatment, as well as ensuring their decisions are being made without undue coercion.

So this put all Doctors in Australia in the position whereby if they fulfilled their Duty to their patients, by warning them of the evidence from reputable sources demonstrating that Covid-19 provisionally-approved vaccines have real known and unknown harms and immuno-compromising effects, they could lose their medical license to practice or face other regulatory sanctions for 'anti-vaccination messages'.

This same tactic to silence Doctors was used in many countries around the world, and many highly reputable Doctors and medical experts did in fact face sanctions for fulfilling their duty of care to their patients, by informing them of the risks of the vaccines.

AMPS Letter to Medical Practitioners exposes silencing of Doctors by Australian Regulators

3. Effective, safe drugs that were available to treat Covid-19 from the beginning of the pandemic, were restricted by many governments around the world including the USA, Australia, the UK and Canada, from use by doctors to treat Covid-19. In some countries the doctors were not allowed to prescribe these drugs, and in some countries these drugs were removed from the market altogether so that doctors could not even write a prescription for the drugs. Early in the pandemic, many good doctors had already identified that certain drugs such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were very successful in treating Covid 19, with many doctors having a 100% success rate with these drugs early in the pandemic before the vaccines were available. Yet government regulators who do not treat patients, were dictating to doctors that they could no longer use these effective treatments.

4. Hospitals in many countries were given significant financial incentives to treat Covid-19 patients, using treatment protocols provided by the government regulators. Is it any wonder that people who were admitted to hospital with a range of illnesses, were classified as 'Covid-19'patients on testing positive on arrival, even when they were being treated or died of another illness? There are numerous reports of doctors and families begging hospitals to use other treatment options using existing safe drugs that had been proven to be more effective than the protocols that the hospitals were directed to follow (note the hospital protocols included the use of new Covid-19 drugs). Some people even took their case to court. It simply makes no sense that a person's own doctor who is experienced in treating patients in hospital, was not allowed to treat their patients using the best practices and drugs that they knew were effective. In many cases, particularly in the USA, these experienced doctors were 'overridden' by the government and corporate hospital system, and sadly in too many cases, their patients died after they were treated using the hospital treatment protocol, against the will of the patient, their family and their personal physician.

Many doctors, scientists and other experts have expressed their opinion that hundreds of thousands of lives could have been saved if the they had been permitted to speak openly and debate the official narrative around Covid-19 and the vaccines; as well as use safe, cheap, effective drugs that were already available to treat Covid-19.

Why would the regulators silence the experts and health practitioners who are treating patients and restrict the use of these drugs, it simply makes no sense? Any why did the bureaucrats interfere with the doctor-patient relationship? Surely your doctor is best placed to understand your individual health condition and risk factors, and be best placed to use his or her clinical experience to determine what is best for you, not a government bureaucrat!

Of course not all doctors did speak out, as many themselves simply trusted the information provided by government regulators. But what is concerning, is that most of the funding for the government regulators and organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) comes from corporate interests such as the big pharma companies who supply the vaccines. There is clearly a conflict of interest here which has caused many to question whether these regulators were serving the best interests of the people, or the interests of those companies who provided their income.

You may wish to consider, as detailed in other sections of this website, that the new experimental vaccines could not have been approved if there already existed effective treatments for Covid-19. This leaves many to question whether this could be the reason why the regulators, who are funded by the vaccine suppliers, went to such lengths to silence doctors and restrict the use of existing treatments. There were hundreds of billions of dollars of profits made from the sale of the Covid-19 vaccines, so the financial incentive to get these drugs into as many arms as possible was extremely high. Do you think this profit incentive may have something to do with why the above unprecedented control over our doctors and interference between the doctor-patient relationship, which ignored all previously held, globally accepted, good medical ethics and practices, was undertaken?

You may also ask how was it possible to achieve such a co-ordinated suppression of global experts and factual information, such that only the 'agreed narrative' on the pandemic was reported in lockstep by the MSM around the world. And how were those in control able to manipulate millions of people worldwide to accept the narrative in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary? The video at the first link below provides a detailed answer to this very question. In the video, an experienced retired Canadian journalist outlines, with evidence, how mainstream media channels, including public broadcasters, colluded globally to spread an agreed narrative that was not truthful, nor based on scientific evidence.

Also see the link below to details of the 'Trusted News Initiative' a BBC led, globally co-ordinated 'Ministry of Truth'.

Other links below also provide further evidence of how extensive the censorship of truthful, scientific information has been throughout the pandemic.

It is also worth noting, that JFK did try to warn us before his assassination, of the importance of free speech to combat forces within our governments and trusted institutions who work against the best interests of the people (see video below).

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Robert F Kennedy Jr. - Government officials in league with Bill Gates and Internet Titans, censor the Truth - Jan 2023

US Senator Hawley Grills Secretary of Department of Homeland Security on Unconstitutional Federally Directed Censorship - November 2022

Jan 2023 - Robert F Kennedy Jr explains how Governments used CIA tactics to suppress free speech and censor media to manipulate society

Jan 2023: Matt Le Tissier outside BBC in support of people killed and harmed by Covid vaccines

Jan 2023 UK Citizens throw white roses across police border on Downing Street to honor the victims of Covid vaccine injury

Jan 2023 - US Dept of Homeland Security outsource censorship of citizens free speech - including over Elections and Covid issues

JFK Tried to Warn US !

FACT: The vaccine does not stay at the injection site in the arm

When the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines began, we were assured by our governments, regulators and mainstream media outlets, that these new experimental drugs were 'safe and effective'. Many people, including very experienced, highly qualified doctors and scientists, had raised safety concerns due to how quickly these new drugs were developed and approved for use. But we were assured even by our doctors (i.e., those doctors who were following the regulators directives) that the substance injected into our arms did not enter the blood stream or circulate throughout the body, but rather that the vaccine remained at the injection site, which may cause some people to have a sore arm for a few days. This information was offered as comfort to assure us that these new drugs could not cause us unknown harms by circulating throughout the body.

This claim of the vaccine remaining at the injection site, was made by our regulators and doctors, even though studies conducted before the drugs were approved, clearly showed that the vaccine circulated throughout the body including to major organs such as the brain, the heart, the liver and the ovaries.

There is now non disputable evidence that the vaccine does not remain at the injection site and in fact can enter the blood stream and go to every part of the body. Even the Center For Disease Control (CDC) in the USA, now admits this to be true. Please see image below of how the information on the CDC's website has changed over time, because various facts that doctors and scientists revealed on social media (for which they were 'fact checked' and had their accounts suspended or removed) eventually accumulated so much overwhelming evidence, that the CDC had to regularly update their website to remove false claims that they had previously made about the vaccines.

Please also see a report below, "The Time of Covid" by Dr Phillip Altman, Clinical Trial & Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs Consultant, in which he explains in Section 10 in respect of the mRNA vaccines, that the mRNA does not remain at the injection site and is not rapidly destroyed. He also discusses the potential impact of this fact.

Now you may think that the regulators did the best they could with the information that they had at the time. But this is simply not true. The evidence that the substance injected did not stay at the injection site, was available to the regulators at the time these 'vaccines' were approved.

If you don't believe this, please watch the video below by Dr Campbell, where he shows you documented evidence from the Australian Regulator, the TGA, that the Pfizer vaccine went to all major organs in the body, and this information was in the hands of the the TGA, in JANUARY 2021. You can be sure that every other regulator around the world also had this same document from Pfizer in their hands at the time they approved these vaccines for use. This document has only come to light as a result of a Freedom of Information request.

Subsequent evidence of the real world harms that these products have caused to people, simply further supports the original evidence . The original evidence should have raised alarm bells about the potential safety risks of these products before they were approved. Yet our regulators, many of our doctors who relied on information from the regulators, and our media, all assured us that these drugs were 'safe' and that they remained at the injection site.

It seems the CDC, other government regulators and the mainstream media were in fact the ones providing the 'misinformation', and not the ethical doctors and scientists who spoke out to reveal the true facts. CDC's admission of their misinformation through removal of what they had previously claimed to be facts, should in itself cause any reasonable person to question what other 'facts' promoted through mainstream media from government regulators, may also be 'misinformation' or 'disinformation'.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Dr Phillip Altman: The Time of Covid - August 2022

Dr Campbell Reviews Newly Released Pfizer Biodistribution Data from Jan 2021

How CDC Advice Changed Over Time as Claims Labelled 'Misinformation' Were Proven to be True!

FACT: The Vaccines are not fully tested, & are causing Injuries & Deaths; evidenced by Government 'adverse event' databases, & high 'excess death' rates in highly vaccinated countries

Tens of thousands of doctors around the world have provided significant evidence on how toxic the vaccines are. In fact, see the article in Supporting Evidence below which links to 1,000 peer reviewed medical papers on Covid-19 vaccine harms.

Government databases around the world show OVER 4 MILLION adverse reactions have been reported from the vaccines, including many thousands of deaths, and hundreds of thousands of people who have suffered life changing illness and life-long disability. And the true number of adverse event cases are likely to be significantly higher than what has been reported, as it was estimated long before Covid-19, that the numbers in these databases are under-reported by between 30% and 99%.

Furthermore, because many doctors and scientists have been 'silenced', they are not able to share their research findings and clinical experience on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and treatments globally with other doctors, so many people presenting with new illnesses and symptoms since receiving Covid-19 vaccines, are either being gas-lighted and told that they are simply suffering from stress or anxiety; or the doctor keeps sending them for tests but can't find a diagnosis for the unusual symptoms in previously healthy people. It is possible therefore, that many vaccine injuries are simply not being recognised by most doctors or their patients, hence they are not reported in official government reporting systems.

There are numerous calls from doctors, scientists, lawyers and concerned citizens in all countries to completely stop the Covid-19 vaccines, pending thorough investigation of the alarming number of reports of injury and death from these drugs.

One study released by the German government (see link below), showed that the risk of a serious adverse event (i.e. death, long term hospitalization or permanent injury) from the vaccines, is 1 in 5,000 doses. Therefore, if you have 3 jabs, you have a 1 in 1,667 chance of either dying or getting a serious and potentially life-long injury, from the jab.

A later report in July 2023, as detailed in the video below of Dr Campbell, shows that in a study of 793 people in Switzerland who had the Moderna booster vaccine, one in 35 people had vaccine associated myocardial injury (i.e. heart damage).

In the video, Dr Campbell states that if regulators around the world don't take notice of the information that he reveals via this paper, they are at best in his view negligent and at worst, he says ''I don't even want to think about it''.

We also provide a link below to Dr Campbell's YouTube channel, as Dr Campbell has been following and reporting on the science around Covid-19 since very early in the pandemic, so you may wish to view more of his easy to understand, unbiased, evidence based video reports.

There has been a limited amount of reporting in mainstream media about the vaccines causing blood clots and heart inflammation. But these reports significantly downplay the true risks of the vaccines and the true level of injury and death being caused by these vaccines. So you will not find the true data if you only get your news from the mainstream media TV and Radio channels and newspapers.

Many medical and scientific experts, and critical thinking people, are not entirely surprised by the unprecedented rate of injuries being caused by these experimental vaccines. This is because it usually takes at least 8 to 10 years for a new drug to be developed and fully tested ready for approval for use. These vaccines were developed in less than a year.

Furthermore, the mRNA vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna, are new technologies which have never been used in humans before. So we cannot assume that the Covid-19 vaccines are as safe as other vaccines for which we have a long history of use. The Covid-19 vaccines are made using a completely new technology that is different to the way in which the other vaccines are made, and the way they work in the body is also completely different.

To rush through the ‘emergency use authorization (EAU) for these new drugs, big pharma companies were allowed to skip many important safety tests. For example the Pfizer vaccine has not been specifically tested on pregnant women, nor has it undergone all of the usual toxicology tests that would normally be required for a new drug to be fully approved.

Have you ever wondered why our emergency services have been under such pressure since the vaccine rollout began? These are not Covid-19 patients calling for the paramedics, they are mostly people suffering heart attacks, strokes, blood clots and neurological disorders, which are all now well-known side effects of the vaccines.

With just a little bit of online research you will see that there have been over 1,000 athletes in peak condition, simply dropping dead in the middle of games, in the swimming pool, during competition, whilst training, or dying in their sleep. Sadly, this includes many young college athletes and even some school children. You will also find videos and reports of dozens of TV presenters passing out around the world on camera, as well as musicians and performers collapsing on stage in the middle of performances. This is unprecedented in history and commenced after the vaccines first began to be rolled out globally.

What is just as alarming as these collapses and deaths, is that the mainstream media has been largely silent on these incidents. You can draw your own conclusions as to why the media does not think these unprecedented events should be reported to the public.

Also of great concern is the high rate of 'excess deaths' being reported in highly vaccinated countries, that are NOT Covid deaths. This is the number of deaths over and above what the government and insurance company statisticians would expect in any given year. These deaths are across all age groups, including young healthy, working age people, many of whom simply 'died suddenly'. See Q5 below for more details on excess deaths.

On non-mainstream and many social media channels, there are literally hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of reports on safety issues, deaths and injuries related to the Covid-19 vaccines. There are also hundreds, if not thousands of groups and organizations who have formed since the vaccine rollout to investigate, analyze and report on the safety and efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines. There are also many organizations which have formed, which seek to support the vaccine injured.

To help you get started on doing your own research into the safety of the vaccines, please see below under supporting evidence, a selection of articles, videos and reports which you may wish to view.

We recommend viewing the documentary linked below, "Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion" which shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements while taking an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. The film highlights leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioral scientists in influencing policy, and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and open debate.

The film currently has more than 800,000 views on YouTube.

The article linked below by Steve Kirsch also provides a summary of evidence from numerous other sources including data from vaccine trial reports and government agencies, as well as further links to more information.

In Useful Links we also suggest some organizations, government sites and other sources of information that you may wish to look into further, to help you form your own opinion on the safety and risks of the Covid-19 vaccines.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

Until Proven Otherwise - Two of the Top Cardiologists in The World

UK Parliament Member Andrew Bridgen - An Offer for his Silence

Young People Dropping Dead - Former Black Rock Executive Ed Dowd reports Data from Insurance Companies showing 40% Increase in Deaths across Working-Age People since C19 Vax Mandates Commenced

Dr John Campbell - One in 35 Myocardial Injury after Moderna booster

FACT: Not all C-19 Vaccine ingredients have been disclosed to Regulators or the public and there is evidence that these ingredients may vary from batch to batch

Did you know that Pfizer discloses only 50% of the contents of their vaccine? This means they can add whatever they like to the vial, with no need to disclose the full ingredients. Could you imagine if your milk contained only 50% milk, and the farmers could add whatever they want to the other 50% and not tell you? Would you buy that milk? I doubt it, and yet people are getting injected with a drug, for which they don’t know 50% of the ingredients. What is contained in the undisclosed 50% and what are the potential side effects of these undisclosed ingredients? Pfizer are not required to tell us and government regulators around the world have agreed that this is OK.

In the European Union, the MEPs who are the elected representatives of 450 million Europeans, don't know ANY of the ingredients, as despite their requests they have not been shown details in the Pfizer contract of the ingredients, or the trial data that shows safety and effectiveness of the vaccine. Furthermore, contracts were signed with Pfizer for 4.5 billion doses of the vaccine, enough for 10 doses for every man, woman, child and baby.

Furthermore, a number of scientists who have anlaysed various batches of vaccines have raised concerns that the ingredients vary from batch to batch.

A Pfizer representative also admitted in October 2022, during questioning in the EU parliament, that Pfizer did not even test whether their vaccine could stop transmission during their trials. This means the regulators approved the use of these drugs; told us they would 'stop the spread', and then coerced the entire population through mandates, vaccine passports and other restrictions to take the vaccines, even though there was no scientific evidence that the vaccine could stop transmission.

Any reasonable person would surely question how our governments can assure us that these drugs are safe, when even they don't even know the full contents of these products. It seems we are expected to simply trust big Pharma and the regulators, who have clearly lied to us. The shocking admission by Pfizer about not testing their vaccine for transmission, has left many wondering what else we have not been told.

EU MEP - Biggest Corruption Scandal in the World - No-one Knows What is in the Pfizer Vaccine

Holocaust Survivor Vera Sharav: "TheyHave the Capability Today That Hitler Would Have Only Dreamed Of"

FACT: Millions of Vaccine Adverse Reactions, including serious Life Changing Injuries & Deaths, have been reported globally and are NOT being investigated by Regulators

The public was tricked into believing the Covid-19 'vaccines' were 'approved'. They are not 'approved'. In each country they fall under either a 'provisional approval' or 'emergency use' approval.

There is a huge difference between this type of approval, which is pending the finalization of research, and the difference is that they have not yet been proved to be fully safe and effective as claimed. The manufacturers have been given up to 6 years to provide the outstanding safety and efficacy data, and already after more than 2 years of use world-wide we are seeing the highest rates of death and serious adverse events ever associated with any drug released in history.

There are two key 'controls' to confirm the safety of any new drug. The first control is through various safety trials conducted on the drugs before they go to market. The results of these trials must show the drugs to be safe for humans in order for the drug to be fully approved for use.

The second control is after the drugs go to market. Once the drugs are being used in humans, data is collected on any 'adverse events' that occur from the drugs. This data should be collected by both the manufacturer of the drug, as well as through various government reporting systems. This data needs to be monitored and analyzed for post market 'safety signals' which should be followed up. This 'safety net' is a second control measure to ensure that any safety concerns or side effects that were not picked up in the drug trials, are discovered as quickly as possible, and where necessary the drugs can be either removed from the market, or the way in which they are used and by whom, can be modified to reduce any potential harm to patients.

The monitoring and analysis of the post market adverse event reports is even more important for 'emergency use' or 'provisionally approved' drugs, like the Covid-19 vaccines. This is because all of the usual safety testing that would normally be done before the drug is approved, is still not complete for these drugs. So for this category of drugs, the first safety control is not yet complete, even though they have been provisionally approved for use by humans. Since the first safety protection is not fully reliable, this places even more reliance on the second protection - the post market adverse events reporting systems.

But in spite of the significant number of deaths and injuries reported in all vaccine adverse event reporting systems around the world for the Covid-19 vaccines, no regulatory body is actively following up on these reports or calling for an investigation into the significant harms being caused by the vaccines. Governments are ignoring the alarming safety signals from their own databases. Please go to the OPEN VAERS link below for data in the USA Government's reporting system VAERS, to see for yourself how many deaths and injuries have been reported to date in just one country.

All highly vaccinated countries around the world are also reporting very high increases in 'excess deaths' which are not from Covid-19, since the rollout of the vaccines, ranging from 16% to 40%, and mostly in young people. 'Excess deaths' are deaths over and above the number of deaths that are expected in each country, each year. This undeniable statistic adds yet another significant 'safety signal' that our governments should be investigating. But despite doctors, scientists, lawyers and concerned citizens in every country raising these concerns with their politicians, none of our governments consider this alarming safety signal warrants investigation. It is very difficult for a reasonable person to understand why they are ignoring this serious concern.

These reporting systems and government statistics are meant to be the 'safety net' for these experimental, provisionally approved or emergency use approved, Covid-19 vaccines, which have not been fully tested and are still undergoing clinical trials. Clearly there are significant signs that these vaccines are causing death and injury at a rate never before seen for any drugs or vaccines, and yet our governments' own 'safety net' of adverse event reporting systems are being ignored by the regulators.

Some Australian doctors are calling for the relatively new 'provisionally approved' category of drug regulations by the TGA to be removed, until TGA addresses what seems to be a broken adverse events reporting system. They argue that if this critical safety net of post market adverse events and death reports are not being actively monitored and investigated by the TGA, with appropriate action taken, we are not providing adequate safety protection to the public by allowing 'provisional approval' for drugs that have not yet completed their full safety testing.

See videos and articles under supporting evidence below discussing the lack of follow up by government regulators on these reports of deaths and injuries from the Covid19 vaccines, in government databases. It is also worth noting, that by their own admissions, most regulators agreed that these adverse events are typically 'under' reported by anywhere from 30 to 99 times, so the real numbers of death and injury are likely to be SIGNIFICANTLY higher than what is contained in official government databases. This may explain the high number of excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries, but until our governments investigate, we cannot know the truth.

In addition to the call for Governments to investigate their own data, there are millions of people all over the world calling for investigation into the sudden unexpected deaths of young healthy people; the millions of vaccine injuries; and the unprecedented level of 'excess deaths' in highly vaccinated countries.

Many of these calls are coming from those at the frontline, who are seeing firsthand how the vaccines are affecting people, and who are best placed to see what is really going on, including tens of thousands of frontline doctors, nurses, pathologists, funeral directors, scientists, researchers, data analysts, and numerous whistle blowers. These ethical, caring people are speaking out and collating and analyzing data and research, which they are providing to police, politicians and regulators.

Calls for investigation into the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines and the vaccine programs being rolled out by governments, are also coming from elected government representatives. Please see link to video below under supporting evidence of one such call from UK MPs, as well as a link to an interview with Andrew Bridgen, a UK MP who is relentless in his call for pandemic responses, vaccine injuries and excess deaths in the UK to be investigated. In his words, 'this is a fight we can't lose'.

Please also see the link below to "Australian Government Exposed" for details of Senators who voted against an enquiry into the reason for the high number of excess deaths in Australia since the Covid -19 vaccine rollout began. The article also goes on to reveal details of a Freedom of Information request by South Australian Liberal Senator Alex Antic, who has exposed the government's attempts to censor Covid-19 related content and stifle public debate.

"The document's shocking revelations prove that the Australian Department of Home Affairs made more than 4,000 requests to digital platforms to censor all Covid-19 content. The Government essentially controls the main stream media by its sheer weight of expenditure on advertising - the main stream news media follows the Government narratives (or else). This is why there is, to a large extent, an undeclared ban on reporting vaccine deaths and injuries".

But this is not just happening in Australia. All over the world the mainstream media is deafening in its silence on these calls and their lack of coverage of the evidence and data of vaccine injuries and deaths. And the governments, regulators and law enforcers globally are not taking action in spite of the mountain of irrefutable evidence.

Please see video below of Dr Peter Doshi, Senior Editor of the British Medical Journal, expressing his concerns over the censorship of the media to report balanced coverage and present the risks to the general public about the mRNA Covid-19 injections. He also questions why the pharmaceutical companies have not released all the data they accumulated during their clinical trials for the vaccines, since "Pfizer and Moderna trial data are both showing a clear signal of increased risk of serious adverse events among the vaccinated".

Please do your own research and see for yourself just how much evidence exists around the safety risks of these vaccines. These are serious risks on which your governments and the mainstream media are not only silent, but they actively censor when medical and scientific experts speak out with the facts and evidence.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

Open VAERS - US data on Vaccine Adverse Events Reports

Victim of Boris' "Safe & Effective" mRNA Injections, Adam Rowland MSc

British Medical Journal's Editor Dr Peter Doshi raises Alarming Questions about COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns - Nov 2022

Warning from Frontline Nurse in New Zealand - November 2021

Warning From UK Funeral Director - December 2021

South Australian Senator Antic: Covid Vax Rollout Greatest Scandal in Medical History - Nov 2022

Q3. Are the vaccines effective?

Before reading the facts below, please consider the UK government's own data on the health implications of the Covid vaccination program, which was presented by UK MP Andrew Bridgen to the UK parliament.

After viewing the information presented by Andrew Bridgen below on the effectiveness and risks of the Covid vaccines (which is consistent with government data in most other countries of the world), reading the other facts and information on this website, and undertaking your own investigations, you can draw your own conclusions as to whether you believe the vaccines are 'effective'.

Dr John Campbell: Speech by UK MP Andrew Bridgen in UK Parliament - March 2023

FACT: Vaccinating the whole population did not protect granny

For 2 years the entire world population was told by their governments, mainstream media channels and high-profile celebrities, that we ALL needed to get vaccinated to stop the transmission of Covid-19. Perfectly healthy children, and young and middle-aged adults, all of whom were at either no risk, or an extremely low risk, of serious outcomes from contracting Covid 19, were told that they needed to get vaccinated for the sake of the elderly and those in our society who were vulnerable to serious outcomes.

Many people were not prepared to take the experimental gene therapies which were labelled as 'vaccines', as they were concerned that there had not been enough time for these new drugs to be adequately tested for safety and effectiveness (efficacy). Many people also understood, that for healthy people, their own natural immunity has always been the best defense against disease. Therefore, their personal health choice was not to take a new, experimental drug which could have either immediate, or long term, side effects that were not yet known.

Did anyone ask Granny whether she wanted her healthy children and grandchildren to risk unknown side effects of an experimental jab, in her name? Please see the video "This is how we treated Granny" in the link under Supporting Evidence and decide for yourself whether you think the pandemic measures were the best way to protect Granny.

But instead of allowing people to exercise their own medical freedom in democratic countries, government leaders and health regulators around the world led the cry for these people to be discriminated against, with extreme measures including 'vaccine passports' and 'vaccine mandates' that ensured the unvaccinated were in many cases excluded from society, unable to work, unable to travel and in many cases 'locked down' in their homes or government mandated quarantine facilities. Consequently, millions of people around the world lost their jobs, their homes, their families and their friends. And in poorer countries, many people literally starved to death as they were not able to leave their homes to get food.

Never forget that we were all told that these measures were necessary in order to exclude those people who chose not to take an experimental vaccine which our governments, media and celebrities ASSURED US would 'stop the spread' of Covid 19.

It became pretty obvious within weeks of the vaccine rollout that these drugs did NOT prevent people from catching or transmitting Covid-19, as the vaccinated population continued to contract Covid-19, in many cases multiple times. But instead of reviewing the measures taken to manage the pandemic, governments in democratic countries 'doubled down' on measures that clearly were not working, with a second shot, then a booster, then another booster and even more extreme measures, all in a desperate attempt to coerce everyone to take the new experimental drugs in order to 'stop the spread'.

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide protested, whilst a disproportionately high number of vaccinated people continued to fill up hospital wards, and yet instead of listening to the protestors and looking at the data and science that was available, governments became more forceful in their push to vaccinate the entire population, silencing world renowned scientists and doctors from all countries, who dared to speak out and raise any concerns about the risks and ineffectiveness of both the vaccines and the policies.

Furthermore, the worldwide cry from political leaders was that this was a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated', even though the data from government databases globally proved that this simply was not even close to being true. This new call from government leaders, further deepened the divide between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, breaking down families and communities even further.

In October 2022, a senior Pfizer executive finally admitted under question in the EU parliament, that Pfizer had not even tested the so-called Covid 19 'vaccine' for transmission of the virus. Please see various reports on this in the supporting evidence below. All government regulators who approved the Pfizer vaccine, knew that it had not been tested against stopping the spread of Covid 19, as this was clear from the trial data provided to the regulators prior to the emergency use approval of the new drugs in each country. So why did our governments and mainstream media blatantly lie to us, and discriminate against the unvaccinated based on this very big lie, a lie which destroyed millions of lives around the world?

An executive from AstraZeneca was also specifically questioned in EU parliament about whether their vaccine was tested to stop the transmission. They did not answer the question, but instead said that a paper published in the Lancet proved that the vaccines had saved 20 million lives. But an article in a journal doesn't prove anything. The data from governments, as well as Health and Life Insurance companies all over the world, do not provide any evidence that any lives were saved by the Covid-19 vaccines. Please watch the video below to form your own opinion as to whether the executive from Astra Zeneca was being truthful and transparent in her response to the EU MEP.

Please also read information outlined under other facts on this website for further details of why the vaccines did not protect the elderly and the vulnerable. The supporting evidence below also includes links to articles and videos that show various data and statistics in relation to the effectiveness of the Covid 19 'vaccines', to assist you in your own assessment of the effectiveness of these experimental products.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

Our World in Data

This is how we treated Granny during the Pandemic

FACT: We were told that 2 shots would protect us, then 3, then 4 and now an annual shot

For the average person it is difficult to read and understand the science behind the Covid-19 vaccines, so let's consider this issue simply from a logical, common sense point of view.

When the vaccines were first announced, we were told that 2 shots would be needed to be 'fully vaccinated' against catching or spreading Covid-19. But not long after the second shot, it was clear that vaccinated people were still catching and spreading Covid-19. So then our governments told us that we needed a 'booster shot'. Still vaccinated people were catching Covid-19, for many people more than once. Again, clearly the vaccines either didn't work, or only worked for a very short period of time. To any logical person, it simply didn't make sense to keep taking a drug to protect you against a virus, when the drug didn't work the first, second and now third time.

It also didn't make sense to pressure unvaccinated people to take a drug to protect the vaccinated people, when that same drug didn't work to protect the vaccinated people. If the vaccine did work, it wouldn't matter if another person chose to remain unvaccinated, as the vaccinated person would be protected against the virus. If the drug didn't work, why force it on the unvaccinated people?

Clearly the coercion to force unvaccinated people to inject these experimental drugs, was immoral, unethical and would have made no difference whatsoever to the vaccinated people. In fact the data is now showing that unvaccinated people who have been infected with Covid-19, have a much stronger, longer lasting immunity against the virus, than vaccinated people. So many of the unvaccinated people are safer to be around than vaccinated people. The science also now shows that the viral load of the unvaccinated person who catches Covid-19, is no different to the viral load of a vaccinated person.

A doctor in the UK summed it up nicely in one of the videos under supporting evidence below. He was asked by the UK Health Minister why he did not want to be vaccinated. He explained that firstly he had already worked for a year in the Covid ward before the vaccines arrived, so he had already had the virus and therefore had long lasting, natural immunity from further infection. He then went on to explain that the data showed the vaccine only worked for about 6 weeks, and we were told that you could not be considered to be protected until 2 weeks after the shot, so to keep everyone fully vaccinated, you would need to jab everyone, every month. This is not only impractical but would likely lead to unknown damage to people's immune systems. Not long after his response went public, the NHS (National Health Service) in the UK dropped the Covid-19 vaccine mandate for UK health workers, as the doctor's arguments could not be disputed.

Yet in other parts of the world, the mandates for health workers still continue to this day. How can it be that in one country, health workers don't need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 and yet in most other countries they do? Is the science different from country to country? This one example clearly illustrates that Covid-19 vaccination policies are not based on science, but rather on the politics of each country.

The big pharma companies continue to bring out more and more booster shots, indicating that perhaps an annual combined Covid-19 and Flu shot will be recommended. But remember these vaccines are still experimental and there is no evidence that they are effective, so what is the driver behind pushing more of these vaccines onto the population? The virus itself is constantly mutating, so each vaccine is designed to target a virus that is no longer in circulation. This makes no sense at all and most likely explains why the vaccines are not effective in stopping the virus from spreading.

Were you aware that many governments around the world signed contracts with the big pharma companies to purchase enough doses of the vaccine to vaccinate their entire population 10 times over? And these contracts were not options to purchase, the countries were obligated to purchase this excessive number of vaccine doses, whether they needed them or not. Why would our governments tell us we needed two jabs to be fully vaccinated, when they had already signed contracts to give us 10 doses? Clearly someone was not telling the truth about these vaccines from the outset.

One final point that defies logic, is why these experimental drugs are called vaccines. The definition of a vaccine is that once you inject it, you are protected against catching the virus, usually for life. These products have been 'marketed' as vaccines, when clearly, they do not fit the traditional meaning of a vaccine. This deceptive marketing is in breach of many health regulations globally.

You may also be surprised to know that the definition of 'vaccine' was actually changed in some dictionaries just before the Covid-19 vaccines were released, seemingly so as to accommodate these new experimental drugs. But not many people in the world would have checked the dictionary to confirm the definition. Those who marketed these new experimental drugs as vaccines, would have clearly known, that when most people were told they were taking a 'vaccine', they would have assumed the traditional meaning of the word 'vaccine', which traditionally protects in most cases for life, or at the very least for many years.

Joe Rogan Show - Sept 2021 UK Govt data shows 70% of Covid-19 deaths were fully vaccinated people

FACT: The SCIENCE clearly shows that vaccines injected into the arm ARE NOT ABLE to stop infection

Scientists and doctors who specialize in immunology and respiratory viruses, know that intramuscular injections (i.e, injecting a vaccine into the muscle in your arm or body) to vaccinate against respiratory diseases, does not work!

This is not only true from an agreed scientific perspective, but the real world data shows that Flu vaccines do not reduce the number of people being admitted to hospital for influenza like illnesses, nor do they reduce deaths from these illnesses. This has been proven in multiple countries.

We have been lied to for decades by pharmaceutical companies and governments about the effectiveness of Flu vaccines, and these same institutions and companies must have known that Covid-19 vaccines could never have been an appropriate response to the viral pandemic.

In the brief video below, Australian Professor Edward J Steele, who is a Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist, explains precisely why the Covid-19 shots could never have prevented anyone from catching or spreading the virus.

Furthermore, Prof Steele points out that big Pharma, all of his scientific colleagues in Australia, and all of the senior scientists advocating the vaccines know these vaccines can't work, as a vaccine injected into the muscle can't possibly activate local, mucosal oral-nasal immunity. According to Prof Steele "It is a big lie that has been pushed on the population".

The real world data certainly shows us that Prof Steele is correct. He spoke of his concerns in September 2021, yet the Australian government and other regulators around the world, continued to push the vaccines and in many countries, including Australia, vaccine mandates still exist even today for some parts of society such as healthcare workers.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Sept 2021 - Prof Edward Steele, Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist explains why Covid-19 vaccines injected into the arm CAN NOT WORK!

Dr Stillwagon - Covid-19 Vaccines Give Absolutely No Protection Against Infection

FACT: The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are in fact gene therapy, not vaccines

mRNA 'vaccines' created by Moderna and Pfizer are gene therapies. They meet all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine. mRNA contain genetic instructions for making various proteins. They deliver a synthetic version of mRNA into your cells that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-COV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activated your immune system to produce antibodies.

Marketing these products as 'vaccines' is a deceptive practice that violates the law that governs advertising of medical products.

SARS-CoV-2 has not even been proven to be the cause of Covid 19, as the two have not been shown to be causally linked.

Please see the article under supporting evidence below for further details.

The gene based therapies in the Pfizer and Moderna 'vaccines' were part of a completely new class of drug under early research for rare diseases, including genetic defects and cancers intended to be used on relatively small numbers of seriously ill patients where the benefit was hoped to outweigh the considerable risk of serious adverse events associated with gene-based therapies. These risky blue sky drugs were never intended for healthy people, children or pregnant women, and never intended to be used indiscriminately worldwide.

The public was tricked into believing these gene-based 'vaccines' were 'approved'. They are not 'approved'. In each country they fall under either a 'provisional approval' or 'emergency use' approval. There is a huge difference between this type of approval, which is pending the finalization of research, and the difference is that they have not yet been proved to be fully safe and effective as claimed. The manufacturers have been given up to 6 years to provide the outstanding safety and efficacy data, and already after 18 months of use world-wide we are seeing the highest rates of death and serious adverse events ever associated with any drug released in history.

EVIDENCE:

COVID-19 'Vaccines' Are Gene Therapy - Joseph Mercola June 26, 2022

Attorney Thomas Renz confirms Pfizer and Moderna acknowledge in Federal Filings that MRNA Covid products are Gene Therapy

mRNA jabs use genetic engineering yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23

FACT: Pfizer Vaccine Trial Data Showed the Vaccinated had less than 1% more protection from Covid than the Unvaccinated group, not 95% as advertised

FACT: Vaccines have not stopped transmission of the virus, they were not even tested to stop transmission, and there is no evidence they saved millions of lives

Whilst it became fairly obvious soon after the vaccine rollout commenced that these vaccines were not working, due to the fact that vaccinated people were still contracting the virus, at the same, if not at a higher rate than the unvaccinated, most governments around the world responded by coercing their citizens to get more and more jabs and putting more and more restrictions on the unvaccinated to try to force them into taking the vaccine.

Please see a video below of Dr Scott Youngblood who presented evidence to the San Diego City Council in September 2022 calling for the Covid injections to be stopped. The data presented by Dr Youngblood shows many concerns about the lack of effectiveness of the vaccines, as well as data showing that the vaccines may be causing harm to people's natural immunity system

Dr Youngblood also explains that since 11th August 2022, even the CDC advises as follows:

"CDC's Covid-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person's vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild, and persons who have had Covid-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection."

Many doctors and scientists around the world have been raising concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines from very early in the pandemic, but governments colluding with mainstream media and big tech companies, have ensured that most of these experts were largely silenced.

But in the second half of 2022, some important truths about the vaccines were finally exposed in more mainstream channels that were able to reach more of the general public.

Firstly, in September 2022, Dr Aseem Malhotra, one of the most highly respected and influential cardiologists in the UK, published a paper after doing many months of research on all of the available vaccine trial data, as well as other real world data available on vaccination, infections and deaths. Some of his findings were shocking and he has since been speaking out to try to bring the truth about the vaccines into the mainstream media, as well as addressing UK politicians and regulatory institutions, to call for the vaccine rollout to be stopped until a thorough, independent analysis of all available data on the vaccines can be completed.

One of his key findings is that people are more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the vaccines than they are to be hospitalized by Covid-19, with estimates that 1 in 800 people are likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the vaccines.

He also found in the Pfizer trial data that reports of serious adverse events in the vaccine group, were higher than hospitalizations in the placebo group. Also, the all-cause mortality was slightly higher in the vaccinated group.

He also pointed out that in respect of the Pfizer vaccine, that we have been misled about the effectiveness of the vaccine, because Pfizer reported on the 'relative' risk of the vaccine effectiveness, instead of the 'absolute' risk. What he uncovered is that Pfizer's own data shows that you would need to vaccinate 119 people to stop one Covid-19 infection (i.e. the absolute risk), whereas they reported that their vaccine had a 95% 'relative' risk which is a misleading statistic, that gave people an unfounded confidence in the effectiveness of the vaccine.

Dr Malhotra also concludes that he does not believe the evidence is there to show that the vaccines have saved millions of lives, it is purely speculation, based on flawed studies. In fact, he points out that in the Pfizer trial, not only was there no reduction in deaths between the vaccinated group and the placebo group, there were actually slightly more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group.

See the videos below of various interviews with Dr Malhotra, where he explains these statistics and discusses his findings in more detail.

Secondly, further confirmation that the Covid-19 vaccines do not stop transmission, was revealed in the EU parliament, when both Pfizer and AstraZeneca executives were specifically asked whether they tested their vaccines for transmission of the virus. The response from Pfizer was 'No', and AstraZeneca representative simply skirted around the issue and didn't respond. Eventually she referred to an article published in the Lancet that claimed that 20 million lives had been saved by the vaccines, but there is no evidence of this, it is simply based on computer models, that have been proven to be based on incorrect assumptions. The real world data does not show any reduced deaths from the vaccines. In fact the more highly vaccinated countries have higher Covid-19 death rates (see discussion on this Fact above).

But regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of the Lancet article, that does not answer the question as to whether AstraZeneca tested their drug for transmission, the question was simply evaded and not answered. One would assume that if the answer was 'YES' the answer would have been provided immediately.

Following the video from the EU MEP which went viral on social media in October, 2022, Australian Senator Rennick also posted the following on his Telegram channel:

"In the last few weeks there has been a lot of discussion around Pfizer not testing whether or not the Vaccine stopped transmission. In the fine print it's true Pfizer claimed it was unclear as to their vaccine's effectiveness in stopping transmission. Of course this didn't stop authorities claiming or implying it did stop transmission. But that's not the only thing that's been overlooked in the fine print. The six month supplementary Appendix reported adverse events that showed 300% more related adverse events, 75% more severe adverse events and 10% more serious adverse events in the inoculation group than the placebo group. There were more deaths in the inoculation group as well. So when authorities claim that the vaccine reduces hospitalization and deaths what evidence are they referring to when they make this claim? The attached report has been overlooked for far too long."

See videos below from the EU MEPs with further details on the questioning of these pharmaceutical companies about their vaccine trials. Also, the Pfizer Supplementary Appendix report to which Senator Rennick refers is also linked below - Page 10 shows the table from which Sen Rennick calculated the above percentages.

If you go to the Children's Health Defense website under useful links below, and type "covid vaccine" into the search bar, you will find numerous articles related to the safety and effectiveness of these products.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Pfizer Trial Data Supplementary Appendix

USEFUL LINKS:

Children's Health Defense

Covid Hearing in European Parliament - Pfizer Admits They Did NOT Test For Transmission

Dr Scott Youngblood - Covid-19: A Time for Reassessment - Presentation to San Diego City Council September 2022

FACT: Government data shows highly vaccinated countries have higher Covid 19 cases and deaths; Haiti did not vaccinate its citizens yet has one of lowest Covid death rates in the world

Data from the World Health Organization (WHO) showed only 837 people have died in Haiti since the pandemic began until July 7, 2022, with a vaccination rate of 1.4% of the 11.6 million population.

Meanwhile, countries who did vaccinate a high percentage of their populations are struggling, and telling their citizens they need repeated injections.

The article below under supporting evidence summarizes Covid-19 death statistics from a number of countries, but here are a few highlights from the article:

"- Israel 72% vaccinated and fully embraced all four boosters - highest Covid-19 death rate on record this year

- Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway - 84%, 83%, 81%, 79% vaccinated - all countries got obliterated by Covid-19 - Denmark, Iceland and Norway each documented their highest death rates in late June/early July 2022

- Canada - 86% vaccinated - did not beat its record death rate, but a similar number of deaths to pre-vaccine, so the vaccines did absolutely nothing

- Japan - 82% vaccinated - worst death rate in year to end June 2022, doubling its pre vaccine record

- Australia - 87% vaccinated - Covid-19 is running through Australia like a bushfire - in the first 6 months of 2022, following mass vaccination, the country had a death record four times greater than at any other time during the pandemic

- New Zealand - 84% vaccinated - significant spike in deaths since around March 2022

- South Korea - 88% vaccinated - huge spike in deaths between March and June 2022

- Hong Kong 89% - the charts in the article speak for themselves - either the vaccines didn't work, or the lockdowns postponed the inevitable.

- Malta 92%- also beat its all-time record post mass vaccination

- Singapore 92% - one of the most vaccinated countries on the planet, and they recently destroyed their all-time COVID-19 death record… twice"

Another country with low vaccination rates is South Africa. With only 32% of its population having had the initial 2 doses and only 6% with a booster as at 1 November, 2022, it has one of the lowest death rates from Covid-19. This may be due to the fact that they use Ivermectin as part of their treatment protocol, a drug that was effectively 'banned' from being used by doctors to treat Covid-19 in most western countries. Please see video under supporting evidence below of a doctor from South Africa who has had a 100% success rate treating Covid-19 in 3,000 patients using Ivermectin (note the video is from earlier in 2022, so the vaccination statistics he quotes are lower than in November 2022).

Another country that has an extremely low death rate from Covid-19 is India. You can check the figures for yourself at the link below for 'Our World in Data', but interestingly, Uttar Pradesh, the largest state of India with a population over 200 million, distributed treatment packages which included medicines such as Ivermectin, to all of its citizens, rather than just tell them to stay at home until they got so sick that they had to come to hospital (which was the advice in many western countries).

Our governments and regulators like to tell us that the vaccines saved millions of lives, but there is simply no evidence to back up this claim. All of these highly vaccinated countries had the highest number of Covid-19 deaths per million people, AFTER mass vaccination. Meanwhile, low vaccinated countries, and countries who used treatments such as Ivermectin, have extremely low death rates. You can decide for yourself how effective the vaccines are after doing your own research.

You should also consider that another unexpected death rate statistic that has surfaced since mass vaccination commenced, is a significant increase in the 'excess death' rate in highly vaccinated countries. 'Excess deaths' are the number of deaths over and above the number of deaths that would normally be expected to occur in each country, each year. And what is more alarming is that most of these excess deaths (which are NOT from the Covid-19 virus) are in young people and many are from 'unknown causes'. This information is being confirmed from multiple sources including government databases and Health and Life Insurance company data. The issue of excess deaths is also discussed in more detail under questions 2 and 5 on this website.

If you would like to analyze the data on Covid-19 vaccination, infection and death rates for yourself, please see the link below to "Our World in Data", where you can find the information you need.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

Our World in Data

What South Africa Did Right!

Dr Robert Malone - Data Shows Vax May Increase Risk of Infection, Hospitalization & Death Compared to Unvaxxed

FACT: Data from highly vaccinated countries shows the more vaccines you have, the higher your chance of Covid-19 infection, hospitalization and death

Evidence for this fact can be found by searching government statistics which show the vaccine status of those who die from, or are hospitalised with, Covid-19. As more data is revealed that supports this fact, some government agencies appear to be either changing how they report the data, or delaying the reporting of these statistics, so that it is difficult to see precise trends and come to meaningful conclusions.

But fortunately, there are many independant sources of reliable data and reports which prove this fact, in spite of reporting delays by government regulators.

Once such source is the Cleveland Clinic, a system of over 200 hospitals with 65,000 people working there, which was established in 1821. The first Cleveland paper on Covid vaccines was reported in September 22. The study included 12,000 employees unvaxxed, 2395 single jabbed, 13,000 double jabbed, 20,000 triple jabbed, and 3,500 who were 4 or 5 times jabbed with the original vaccine. The study results show a clear linear relationship between the number of shots and the risk of getting Covid-19, which increases with each shot. Please see the video below from the World Council for health (WCH) for more details on the results of this study.

Below you will also find some data from highly vaccinated New Zealand for consideration.

Please also see the video below of Dr Paul Marik, an experienced ICU doctor, who confirms "...if you look at the data.....the double-vaccinated, the triple-vaccinated, the quadruple vaccinated - they're at higher risk of being hospitalized than the unvaccinated"".

You can also find further evidence in the video below from Canadian Doctor Charles Hoffe, who reveals both Canadian and Australian data showing a direct linear correlation that the more vaccine doses you take, the more likely you are to get Covid, the more likely you are to spread Covid, and it damages your immune system so that you have a higher risk of infection, hospitalisation and death. He refers to the Covid vaccines as 'anti-vaccines'.

But you may also wish to do your own survey of those around you, by comparing the infection and hospitalisation rates amongst those you know who are vaccinated (take note of how many times they have tested positive for Covid, how many vaccine doses they have received, and how severe was their illness), compared to those who are unvaccinated (the number and severity of any Covid illness they may have had).

Just think about this logically, if the fear that our governments and media sought to instill in us was based on facts, then all of our unvaccinated friends and family should be very sick or dying of Covid, whilst the vaccinated remain free of infection. If that is not what you are seeing around you, then logically, what was being reported could not be based on facts.

Cleveland Study - Dr Mark Trozzi & Christof Plothe, DO - C-19 Injections Actually Increase Your Chances of Getting Covid

Dr Paul Doctor Marik - They've Lied about everything in terms of the vaccine

Data on Covid-19 Deaths in Highly Vaccinated New Zealand by Age and Vaccination Status

Pandemic of the Vaccinated: Canadian Doctor Testifies under Oath that the Vaccinated are More Likely to get Covid and die from Covid and all other causes

March 2023 - Dr Chris Martenson - The C19 Shot is the Single Most Disastrous Medical Intervention in all of Human History

September 2022 UK Government Data shows 70% of those who Died of Covid were Fully Vaccinated

Q4. Were pandemic responses such as testing, masking, social distancing, lock-downs and mandatory vaccinations effective, and the only way out of the pandemic?

You can form your own conclusions about the effectiveness of the government response to the pandemic after reviewing the following facts and information, and conducting your own further research of the data, evidence and concerns being put forward by many experts, frontline healthworkers, educators, parents and well informed men and women, most of whom were 'silenced' throughout the pandemic.

You may wish to consider the information in the video below of Dr Jay Bhattacharya, one of the world leading epidemiologists who was co-author of The Great Barrington Declaration, which was a proposed response to the pandemic, authored by global scientists and medical experts who recommended a very different, and as it turns out, more appropriate, response to the pandemic. See more about the Great Barrington Declaration in the facts below.

But also consider the information in the video below by Dr Chris Shoemaker, which begs the question why a pandemic was called, when scientists already had a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses.

Dr Jay Bhattacharya - They LIED! There was NOT a Scientific Consensus on ANY of the Pandemic Response Measures

Dr Chris Shoemaker - Scientists spent 15 years to find that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses

FACT: Pandemic measures were not in line with the science-based recommendations from the WHO Pandemic Plan 2019, nor from country Pandemic Plans in place at the time of the outbreak

Prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic, World Health Organization (WHO) experts analyzed the scientific literature and drafted recommendations for pandemic management.

Please see under supporting evidence below 'The WHO Review And Why It Matters To You', for a detailed analysis of whether the non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) deployed during the Covid-19 pandemic, were in line with the 2019 WHO pandemic management recommendations. On page 6 of this document, you will find the following summary of the recommendations made by the WHO in 2019.

These same recommendations were included in the 'Pandemic Plans' of many countries at the time of the Covid outbreak, and these recommendations were accepted in late 2019 as the best science available.

When you compare the list of policies adopted by most countries around the world throughout the Covid pandemic, you may be surprised to see that none of the recommendations that were accepted as best practice, science-based responses, were followed. In fact, in most cases the exact opposite approach was enforced.

Please read the full analysis for yourself in this well researched and easy to read paper. You can then decide for yourself how many of the government policies and measures to address Covid were based on 'the science' and whether they really were in the best interests of our health, and the best way to deal with the pandemic.

Please also see the short video 'Jordon Peterson on The Pandemic' in the link below, where he states:

"I have had conversations with people advising at the highest levels of government, particularly in Canada, who have told me flat out, and they are very reliable sources, that NONE of the Covid policy for the last year was driven by reliance on science, its ALL opinion poll..."

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

FACT: False positive PCR test results were used to convince healthy people that they were sick, and to report higher death rates 'with' Covid rather than 'from' Covid

As already mentioned elsewhere on this site, the inventor of the PCR test is on record as saying that the PCR test cannot and should not be used to diagnose disease as it will give a very high number of ‘false’ positive results (see more details under question one above). Even the US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) removed the PCR test in July 2021, because they finally admitted that it is not an accurate test for Covid-19.

PCR tests were not an effective response to the ‘pandemic’, and this was already agreed in most countries’ approved pandemic plans that were in existence before the Covid-19 pandemic was announced by the WHO.

Not only was the PCR test NOT an effective response, but the use of the PCR tests invoked fear in the population, by convincing healthy people that they were sick when they were not; and allowing governments to report deaths 'with' Covid, instead of accurately reporting the lesser number of people who died 'from' Covid.

If you think about it logically, when in history have we ever tested healthy people of all ages on mass, for a disease or illness for which they had no symptoms? Would you have even known that there was a pandemic, if the health officials hadn't told people to go and get tested for a disease for which they had no symptoms, and then reported these huge false number of positive test results in the news every day for months on end?

And why were governments reporting people who died of anything from gun shots, to car accidents, to cancer, or any other cause, as a 'Covid death', simply because they tested positive for Covid using an inaccurate PCR test on arrival at hospital?

But the fear that this inaccurate reporting of both Covid cases and Covid deaths induced in the majority of the population worldwide, enabled governments around the world to justify the introduction of all of the other pandemic response measures, most of which were explicitly in contravention of numerous human rights laws around the world. These measures destroyed families, communities, economies and hundreds of millions of people's lives, based on convincing healthy people they were sick.

Now you may be thinking 'well they had to do something, and they did the best they could'. But the truth is there had always been a better way to respond, based on decades of research and expertise of epidemiologists, doctors, scientists and other professionals. But as you will see in the next fact (re: The Great Barrington Declaration) and throughout this website, the real experts were not only ignored, but they were targeted, silenced, shutdown and in many cases their careers were destroyed, by government officials working in collusion with big tech platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn and others.

If you don't believe this fact, please go onto Twitter and read the "Twitter files" that expose the communications between these big tech platforms and various US government agencies.

More and more evidence is being exposed every week, that those labeled with all sorts of names such as 'anti-vaxxer' and 'conspiracy theorist', were in many cases the very experts that should in fact have been advising the government and guiding the response. Even Elon Musk is on record as saying that most, if not all, of the so-called 'conspiracies' are actually true, and that it is even more true than people thought. See video below.

Please see a selection of articles below on this topic and do your own further research to determine for yourself whether the mass testing of healthy people using a test that produced mostly false positive results; and using these test results to report false case and death numbers; was an effective response to Covid-19.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Australian Regulator TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) confirms that PCR tests are not fit for purpose

Man Shot Dead was Counted as A Covid Death

Dr Derek Knauss - Analysis of 1500 PCR positive test results - the Flu was relabeled Covid-19

Elon Musk on Twitter Conspiracy Theories - Dec 2022

Dec 2022 - Journalist Matt Taiibi with full access to Twitter Files, exposes extent of Collusion on Censorship between US Govt agencies and Big Tech platforms

FACT: Three World Leading Epidemiologists wrote 'The Great Barrington Declaration' - a proposed response to the Pandemic - but they were 'shut down' by US Officials

Early in the Pandemic, from October 1-4, 2020, the American Institute for Economic Research hosted a remarkable meeting in Great Barrington, USA, of top epidemiologists, economists, and journalists, to discuss the global emergency created by the unprecedented use of state compulsion in the management of the Covid-19 pandemic. The result was 'The Great Barrington Declaration', which urges a “Focused Protection” strategy.

They basically proposed focused protection for those most at risk of Covid, whilst those largely unaffected such as the younger, healthier people, should be left to live life as normal. Whilst they may spread the virus, they would build immunity, and avoid the devastating health and economic effects of lockdowns and other pandemic response measures.

Please go to the links below to read the declaration for yourself, which has signatures from over 47,000 medical practitioners, 16,000 medical and health scientists and 870,000 concerned citizens.

The authors of this document were three of the world's leading epidemiologists:
- Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations
- Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases
- Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

Surely these 3 leaders in their field should be listened to. But not only did the US Government regulators ignore these 3 experts, but they set out on a campaign to smear their names and discredit them in the public arena.

This fact was proven when emails obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request by the American Institute for Economic Research, revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci and his boss, National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins, colluded to quash dissenting views and 'take down' these 'fringe' epidemiologists.

In an Oct 8, 2020 email to Fauci, Collins wrote:

“The proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention … There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises …”

“Don’t worry, I got this,” Fauci replied.

You can draw your own conclusions after reading the evidence below, as to why the US regulators not only failed to consult with experts who were best placed to provide the right advice on how to manage the pandemic, but even worse, they set out to 'silence' and discredit them.

Sadly, the real-world data is now clearly showing that the approach proposed by The Great Barrington Declaration, was in fact the right approach all along. Had Fauci and Collins listened to the experts and worked with them instead of trying to 'take them down', the outcome from the pandemic could have been similar to a bad Flu season.

Even those elderly and vulnerable members of our society, whom the regulators claimed we would be protecting with all of the mandates and measures, were treated unnecessarily cruelly by the overreach of governments throughout the pandemic. See just one example under the supporting evidence below, which is quite representative of what governments did to the elderly during the pandemic.

Did anyone ask the elderly if they wanted to be 'protected' in this way. Why weren't the 2019 pandemic plan measures followed? The measures taken were unprecedented in history, as pointed out by many nurses (see video under FACT below re keeping the sick and dying from their loved ones). There are also many disturbing stories of the elderly being locked in their rooms in nursing homes and left in isolation for long periods of time with no-one to care for them. Sadly, too many died alone and distraught due to the measures that we were all told would protect them.

Please see one of the authors of the GBD, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, in the video below, explain that there was never a scientific consensus on Lockdowns, Masks or the Vaccine.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
1. The Great Barrington Declaration
2. Emails Reveal Fauci, NIH Colluded to Discredit Scientists Behind Great Barrington Declaration
3. How The Elderly Were Treated During the Pandemic

USEFUL LINKS:
1. The Great Barrington Declaration Website

Dr Jay Bhattacharva "That was a Lie!: There was never a Scientific Consensus on Lockdowns, Masks, or the Vaccine

FACT: Masks don’t work and can cause harm including increasing the likelihood of contracting Covid-19 and other respiratory illnesses

There are over 150 published studies and articles that confirm that masks have no effect in preventing community spread of an airborne virus.

The simple logic of virus size (~0.1 microns) versus the mask pore size (~19 microns), means that the virus passes right through the mask. It is like putting up a chain wire fence to keep out mosquitos.

There is ample evidence demonstrating that masks cause a range of ill effects such as malaise, increased CO2 inhalation, contamination, and reduced cardiopulmonary function. These include many studies which show significant damage from wearing masks in the development of young children, including respiratory issues, and dental health issues.

Furthermore, a false sense of security resulting from a false belief in mask effectiveness may lead an infectious individual to wear a mask and mix with high-risk people, putting them at serious risk of potential infection and illness.

In fact, even the WHO stated in June 2020:

"At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID-19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”

Other papers and data on this issue are cited in the 'PANDA WHO Review', listed under supporting evidence below.

To quote further evidence from another well referenced paper by retired Neurosurgeon Russell L Blaylock, listed below under Supporting Evidence, 'COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth?':

"The draconian measures established to contain this contrived "pandemic" have never been shown to be successful, such as masking the public, lockdowns, and social distancing. A number of carefully done studies during the previous flu seasons demonstrated that masks, of any kind, had never prevented the spread of the virus among the public.

In fact, some very good studies suggested that the masks actually spread the virus by giving people a false sense of security and other factors, such as the observation that people were constantly breaking sterile techniques by touching their mask, improper removal and by leakage of infectious aerosols around the edges of the mask. In addition, masks were being disposed of in parking lots, walking trails, laid on tabletops in restaurants and placed in pockets and purses.

Within a few minutes of putting on the mask, a number of pathogenic bacteria can be cultured from the masks, putting the immune suppressed person at high risk of bacterial pneumonia and children at a higher risk of meningitis. A study by researchers at the University of Florida cultured over 11 pathogenic bacteria from the inside of the mask worn by children in schools.

It was also known that children were at essentially no risk of either getting sick from the virus or transmitting it.

In addition, it was also known that wearing a mask for over 4 hours (as occurs in all schools) results in significant hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels) and hypercapnia (high CO2 levels), which have a number of deleterious effects on health, including impairing the development of the child's brain.

We have known that brain development continues long after the grade school years. A recent study found that children born during the "pandemic" have significantly lower IQs - yet school boards, school principals and other educational bureaucrats are obviously unconcerned."

In summary, Masks were not an effective response to the’ pandemic’, and this was already agreed and documented in most countries’ approved pandemic plans prior to the Covid outbreak.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Dr Stillwagon - Masks Decrease Oxygen in Lung Tissue - Covid-19 Infection Works Better with Reduced Oxygen

FACT: Social distancing was ‘made up’ by the regulators, there was no science behind it

FACT: Lockdowns don’t work and in fact, they cause harm

FACT: Keeping the sick and dying from their loved ones was cruel and unnecessary

FACT: Covid 19 was treatable from Day 1 with safe existing drugs, so vaccines were not the only way out of the ‘pandemic', even if they had worked

As evidenced on other pages on this website*, from Day 1 of the Pandemic, thousands of doctors around the world were using existing, safe drugs including Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, to effectively treat Covid-19. But these drugs were actively withdrawn from use by many hospitals and government regulators in many countries, very early in the pandemic, including the USA and Australia. Why did regulators stop doctors from using these drugs? *See above Q1 FACT: Effective Treatments for Covid-19 have been suppressed since the beginning of the 'pandemic' declaration)

Many believe it is because it is not possible to get ‘Emergency Use Authorization” for the new drugs (i.e. the new vaccines), if drugs to treat the illness already existed. By effectively ‘removing’ treatments from doctors, governments around the world told us that vaccines were our only way out.

Arguably, there never was a pandemic, it was created by lies about how deadly the virus was, false test results using PCR tests, and by withholding treatments that would have saved the old and vulnerable, who were the only ones at risk of dying from Covid 19 from the outset.

Now that the drug companies have produced new ‘treatments’ for Covid 19, these same government regulators and agencies are now promoting these new drugs, whilst still withholding the use of drugs that have been used for decades which are known to be very safe.

The new drugs for treating Covid-19, like the new vaccines, have not gone through the same rigorous testing as the already existing drugs, nor have they been in use long enough to know whether there may be long term side effects.

As stated by Dr Chris Shoemaker in the video below, government regulators knew that Ivermectin was the answer to a Corona virus outbreak. They had done the research in advance following the earlier Sars outbreak. But they kept this safe and effective drug from the public in favor of lockdowns, masks, and gene therapies which were relabeled as 'vaccines'.

To obtain some insight into the lengths that those in power went to, in order to suppress Ivermectin as a safe and effective treatment for Covid-19, please watch the short film at the link below "Dear Andy".

In the film Dr. Tess Lawrie recites a letter to Dr. Andrew Hill and asks him what made him turn his back on a potential cure for Covid-19.

In October 2020 Dr. Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organization on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.

But on January 18th, 2021, Dr. Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigor, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on Ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr. Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”

The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. What were his reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?

One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it firsthand; Dr. Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr. Hill during the same time frame.

Please don't underestimate the gravity of Dr Hill's conclusions in this report. We will never know how many lives would have been saved if doctors around the world had been allowed to follow the scientific proof that Ivermectin effectively treats Covid-19, and do what they always do, which is to use their clinical practice experience to repurpose existing drugs.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Dr Chris Shoemaker - Scientists spent 15 years to find that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses

FACT: Many new health conditions now being reported by the media are not ‘normal’

FACT: Big Pharma have been indemnified by governments globally for any deaths or injuries caused by their vaccines

It usually takes at least 8 to 10 years for a new drug to be developed and fully tested ready for approval for use. These vaccines were developed in less than a year. Furthermore, these mRNA vaccines are new technologies which have never been used in humans before. So we cannot assume that the Covid-19 vaccines are as safe as other vaccines for which we have a long history of use. The Covid-19 vaccines are made using a completely new technology that is different to the way in which the other vaccines are made, and the way they work in the body is also completely different.

To rush through the ‘emergency use authorization (EAU)' or 'provisional approval' for these new drugs, big pharma companies were allowed to skip many important safety tests. For example, it has been revealed that the Pfizer vaccine has not been specifically tested on pregnant women, nor has it undergone all of the usual toxicology tests that would normally be required for a new drug to be fully approved.

You may also be interested to know that not all of the trials for these new drugs have been completed yet, with some of the trials scheduled for completion in 2023. Pfizer also vaccinated the 'control group' from the trial (i.e., the group who were originally given the placebo product) after only two months, so now it is impossible to get any further data from the trial that shows the effects of the vaccinated group compared to those who didn't get the vaccine.

So given the above information, it is clear that the risks of these new drugs, are likely to be far greater than the risk of other drugs approved for use by humans. But given this increased risk, we can safely assume that the big Pharma companies who are profiting from the sale of these experimental drugs, will be liable for any damage that they cause, right? WRONG!!.

In fact, it is quite the opposite. Governments around the world have actually indemnified these big Pharma companies from any liability. So big Pharma get all the profits with none of the risk.

Many governments around the world do offer a vaccine injury compensation scheme, which demonstrates that they did understand on signing these contracts, that there was a risk of injury or death from these vaccines.

So big Pharma was not willing to carry the risk of these products, and yet our governments have coerced their people to take the risk of harm from these new experimental 'vaccines'.

Even pilots, whose regulations specifically restrict them from taking any experimental drugs, were coerced to take them by many airlines globally. These regulations have kept passengers safe for decades, and with good reason, as the impact of a pilot collapsing at work from a drug reaction, is much more serious than for other professions and jobs, as the pilot carries the lives of many people in his or her hands.

You may be interested to read the report at the link below, which claims that according to reports, WEF members are being transported solely by unvaccinated pilots to the 2023 conference in Davos, Switzerland due to safety concerns. Bear in mind that many of the WEF members are the very same global elites and government leaders and officials, who are forcing vaccine mandates on the people. So why would they be concerned about the safety of flying with vaccinated pilots? What do they know that they are not telling the people?

Why is it that the safety regulations for pilots (and others) were ignored, when it comes to a vaccine for which even the companies producing them, consider the risk to be too high to accept liability for harm? This question needs to be answered!

People should also consider the impact that taking an experimental vaccine, may have on their life insurance policy.

Of course, these 'indemnity clauses' would not likely hold up in court, should there be any fraud committed in respect of these contracts. You may be interested to know that there is already at least one high profile legal case in the US between a whistleblower and Pfizer in respect of fraud in relation to their vaccine.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

WEF Hires Unvaccinated Pilots

Canadian Parliamentary Secretary, Anthony Housefather - Vaccines not tested in normal way - Way higher liability for Pharma companies

FACT: Children do not need the vaccines, but big Pharma maintain indemnity from liability if the vaccines are approved for children

FACT: The pandemic created 500 new billionaires and the world's richest gained $5 trillion, while workers lost $3.8 trillion and millions lost their jobs & businesses

Q5. Should we stop the vaccines and new treatments now and end all Covid related restrictions?

Millions of people around the world have been calling for all Covid vaccines and pandemic response measures to end from very early on in the pandemic, due to the significant harms being caused, which far outweigh any potential benefits.

These calls are increasing every day, with many ethical politicians from countries all over the world, as well as tens of thousands of doctors, scientists, and lawyers, also demanding that these measures not only be stopped, but that government enquiries be held into:

- the very high level of 'excess deaths' occurring in all highly vaccinated countries;
- vaccine injuries and deaths; and
- other impacts from the Covid-19 response measures.

See below one of many such calls from government MPs around the world, from Australian Senator Gerard Rennick, in his speech to the Australian Senate in March 2023.

Fortunately, calls are being heard in some countries, with Switzerland having withdrawn all Covid vaccine recommendations in early April 2023.

Please read more facts below, which include other videos and links to the many cries from around the world to stop the vaccines and end all Covid-19 related measures and restrictions.

FACT: 'Excess Deaths' in highly vaccinated countries are significant since the Covid-19 vaccines rollout, particularly in young people, and the Funeral business is booming

Within months of the mass vaccination rollout for Covid-19 vaccines, statisticians and insurance companies began reporting alarming increases in 'Excess Deaths', most prominently in highly vaccinated countries.

Excess deaths are those deaths over and above what would be expected, based on average deaths over prior years. Statisticians can very reliably predict the number of deaths in any given year, which is why this significant increase, which coincided with the rollout of the Covid vaccines, is so alarming.

Ed Dowd, who is a former Blackrock Executive, first began reporting these statistics, as did some of the world's largest health insurance companies, which started seeing a very big increase in payouts for deaths of young, working aged people. The data he reports is backed up by data from insurance companies, as well as the fact that the funeral business is booming (not related to Covid deaths).

Some Politicians started to raise alarms about the safety of the experimental vaccines not long after the rollout commenced, and as the pattern of excess deaths became clearer, they also raised concerns about whether these excess deaths may be related to the vaccines.

On 11 Oct 2022 a Press Conference held by 6 European MEPS, specifically raised the issue of excess deaths across Europe.

As you will see at the link below under supporting evidence, MEP Cristian Tehreș reported that according to Eurostat data, in July 2022 the excess mortality rate in the EU was 16% higher compared to the average of 2016-2019.

He also pointed out that if you look at the map, the countries with the highest vaccination rates currently have the highest excess mortality rate.

He asks the question whether these excess deaths could be caused by the vaccines, as they are not Covid-19 deaths. But, as MEP Tehres points out, "everyone is avoiding asking this logical question".

Croatian MEP Mislav Kolakusic breaks the figures down further (see link below). He explains that the excess deaths in July 2022 for various countries were Croatia 14.6%, Italy 24.9%, Portugal 28.8%, Greece 31.2%, Spain 36.9%, Iceland 55.8%, Romania 2.4% and Bulgaria 1.4%.

He further explains that there is a big difference in vaccination rates between the countries, with Iceland 83% vaccinated, Romania 42% and Bulgaria only 30%. So it is undeniable that those countries with the lowest vaccination rates had by far the lowest excess deaths of only 2.4% and 1.4%, compared to Iceland with the highest vaccination rate experiencing a 55.8% excess death rate.

The issue of excess deaths is very concerning and remains an ongoing issue. You will find various alarming statistics reported in the articles below.

It is unfathomable as to why governments and regulators around the world are refusing to investigate the cause of these excess deaths. It is also alarming that the timing of 'waves' of these excess deaths, coincide with vaccine and booster rollouts, and yet the regulators are not investigating if there is a link to the vaccines. Meanwhile many governments around the world continue to tell their people that the vaccines are 'safe and effective,' and that we should continue to line up for our next shot.

Do you think your government should investigate the causes of these excess deaths? These are not just statistics, these are people's mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, cousins, aunts, uncles, and friends. Don't the people deserve to know what is causing so many people to die so young, since the introduction of the Covid vaccines?

Please go to the links and video below for more information.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

OECD Statistics

Former Blackrock Exec Ed Dowd on Excess Deaths in Working Age reported by Insurance Companies - September 2022

FACT: Tens of Thousands of Doctors and Scientists around the world are calling for all Covid 19 vaccines to be immediately stopped

Since the beginning of the pandemic, thousands of dedicated medical, scientific, and legal practitioners have been forming organizations to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the experimental vaccines and other measures enforced by governments around the world in the name of keeping us safe from Covid 19.

Many of these organizations are calling for the Covid 19 vaccines to be stopped immediately, due to alarming safety concerns, as well as the fact that they have clearly been shown not to prevent contraction or transmission of the virus in any case. Therefore the ‘risks’ of these vaccines far outweighs any benefits that we were told they would bring.

One such declaration with over 25,000 signatures has been made by doctors, scientists and professionals from over 34 countries, who have declared an International Medical Crisis due to diseases and death associated with the Covid-19 vaccines.

The Declaration includes the following statements:

- We are currently witnessing an excess in mortality in those countries where the majority of the population has received the so-called 'Covid-19 vaccines'. To date, this excess mortality has neither been sufficiently investigated or studied by national and international health institutions.

- The large number of sudden deaths in previously healthy young people who were inoculated with these 'vaccines' is particularly worrying, as is the high incidence of miscarriages and perinatal deaths which have not been investigated.

- A large number of adverse side effects, including hospitalizations, permanent disabilities and deaths related to the so-called 'Covid-19 vaccines', have been reported officially. The registered number has no precedent in world vaccination history.

Please find a link to the declaration below.

Many politicians around the world have also been calling for the Covid vaccines to be stopped, including US Senators who have come together to stop Joe Biden's Military vaccination mandates. Senator Paul Rand kicked off the press conference in early December 2022, by citing that even Dr. Paul Offit, a pro-vaccination doctor and an FDA vaccination advisor resigned over the U.S. policy pushing vaccinations on children and young adults. Offit will not have his own 24-year-old son vaccinated.

Please see links below to some of the doctors, organizations and politicians who have called for an end to the vaccines, including a video with over 40 doctors including world renowned specialists, calling to 'Stop the Shots' and press conference by leading UK Cardiologist Dr Aseem Maholtra who called for an immediate and complete suspension of Covid-19 vaccines in September 2022.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

This Vaccine Needs to be Suspended Immediately, Pending an Inquiry - Dr Malhotra

Leading Doctors Remind Us of the Principles of the Nuremberg Code

FACT: New Covid-19 drug treatments are experimental and have been developed in dangerously short timeframes

Given the risks associated with the experimental vaccines which were rushed to market, and the fact that other safe, effective drugs are already available to treat Covid 19, the safety and effectiveness of the new Covid 19 drug treatments should perhaps also be given closer scrutiny.

Lessons must be learned from the fast-tracked development and testing of the vaccines, to ensure that the same risks are not taken with any Covid-19 drug treatments, especially when existing safe medications have been proven to effectively treat Covid-19.

Let's be clear that government regulators globally knew of the increased safety risks of the fast-tracked, sub-standard testing of the vaccines.

By way of evidence, in the video below, the Canadian Parliamentary Secretary, Anthony Housefather, clearly admits that the companies producing the vaccines "did vaccine testing in an unprecedented way, in a way they normally don't do it", and that "they didn't do the type of testing that normally takes years for these drugs to come to market". He also stated that "these companies were exposed to way higher liability putting these products on the market".

In case it is not obvious to everyone, 'way higher liability' means the companies did not have the same level of confidence in the safety of these vaccines as they would normally have before releasing products to the market.

So both the manufacturers and the government regulators knew there was a risk that these drugs were not safe, and yet they promoted them globally as 'safe and effective 'and in many cases even mandated that healthy people who were not at risk of serious outcomes from Covid-19 must take the vaccines or lose their jobs and incomes.

You can form your own opinion as to why your government insisted that the vaccines were safe and effective, when they knew full well of the increased safety risks due to the sub-standard testing, as evidenced by the terms of the contracts with the companies who produced the vaccines. You should also be aware that these big pharmaceutical companies were in fact granted indemnity from any liability if the vaccines harmed anyone. So basically, they make all the profits from selling the vaccines, but if their products cause anyone to die or be injured, they have no liability to pay damages to that person or their family members.

Canadian Parliamentary Secretary, Anthony Housefather - Vaccines not tested in normal way - Way higher liability for Pharma companies

FACT: Pfizer and Moderna Covid 19 booster vaccines have not been tested on humans

FACT: There is no justifiable health reason to continue with any Covid pandemic related restrictions - none of the Pandemic measures were about Public Health

As outlined on this website with supporting evidence:

the vaccines are not fit for purpose and do not stop infection or transmission; this was even confirmed by Pfizer in EU Parliament in October 2022, where they admitted that they hadn't even tested whether their vaccines would stop transmission
the virus is no more dangerous than a bad influenza and the only people at serious risk are those with weak immune systems, which are primarily the elderly and those with other serious health issues
there are many other serious health conditions which pose a far greater risk to people’s health than Covid 19, which are much more likely to result in hospitalization or death. 10 million people contracted Tuberculosis last year and 1.5 million died, but most people didn't even know, because they weren't scared by the media.
there is virtually no risk of hospitalization or death for young healthy adults, children or babies
there are effective therapeutics for the prevention and treatment of Covid 19 such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, Zinc and many other supplements
all of the pandemic responses such as masking, social distancing, and lockdowns have been shown to have caused significantly more harm than good, which is why the Pandemic Response Plans in place in many countries in 2019, before the Covid outbreak, specifically called out that these measures should not be applied to a healthy population

Based on this information, there does not appear to be any reasonable justification whatsoever to continue with any of the pandemic related restrictions, or to extend any government emergencies powers.

Instead, we should focus on protecting the elderly and vulnerable in the same way that we would protect them from any other illness such as influenza, whilst restoring people’s fundamental human rights, allowing the rest of society to get back to their pre-pandemic lives without the overreach of unnecessary government controls.

Sadly, this approach was precisely the advice offered by global experts who prepared The Great Barrington Declaration very early in the pandemic But US Bureaucrats, Fauci and Collins denied the world the opportunity to find the most effective responses to the pandemic, when they 'shut down' any discussion on alternative approaches that did not involve the planned response that was agreed by governments and regulators around the world, most notably a response with the vaccination of the entire world's population at its' core.

If you have any doubt after reviewing all of the information on this website, that there was not a better way to deal with Covid-19 or any pandemic for that matter (if there was indeed a 'pandemic' at all), please see some of the supporting evidence below, including links to an Enquiry held by US Senator Ron Johnson in January 2022, which revealed significant damning findings in relation to the vaccines and the pandemic responses; as well as the article 'COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth?' This article was published in April 2022. This publication can be found by searching the title on the NIH's own website, so it is difficult to understand how the policies and practices that destroyed so many lives were allowed to continue for so long, when this article clearly outlining the truth can be found on the US government's own National Insitute of Health's website.

Please also see the video below of Christine Anderson, German MEP who is one of many politicians, calling not only for an end to the pandemic measures, but who is demanding transparency on contracts between governments and big Pharma companies who supplied the vaccines. The people have been lied to and they deserve to know what drove the measures that formerly democratic governments inflicted on their people during the pandemic. And we need to ensure that this government overreach never happens again.

As also discussed on this site, many believe that there never was a health pandemic at all, and that it was all planned by a group of global elites in collusion with various government agencies, big tech companies and 'private-public' organizations such as the WEF, WHO and the UN. As world renowned Lawyer, Robert F Kennedy Jr points out in the video below, none of the pandemic response measures were about Public Health, but rather, governments around the world, enforced methods developed by the CIA to control the population.

So if you are wondering how it could be possible for billions of people around the world to be manipulated to accept the Covid measures that were implemented, most of which stripped people of their fundamental human rights, you may find some answers to this question in the RFK Jr video below.

After reviewing the content on this website and doing your own further research, you can make your own mind up about whether there ever really was a health pandemic.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

Robert F Kennedy Jr. - None of the Restrictions were about Public Health -Between 1947 and 1998 the CIA was involved in 87 Coup D'etat's against one-third of the countries, mostly democracies

German MEP Christine Anderson: The People Have Been Lied To - I'd Rather be a Cov-idiot than a Gov-idiot

US CDC Constantly Changing Advice as 'Conspiracy Theorists' Claims are Proven

Covid-19 Narratives which have been Exposed and Destroyed

Q6. What are the future health and economic impacts likely to come from the pandemic response measures?

Throughout this website, we have provided some information on how the global pandemic preparedness complex doubled down on efforts to lobby governments of sovereign nations to relinquish their decision-making process over future so-called pandemics to WHO.

With the third anniversary of the Covid lockdowns and the amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations currently being proposed, PANDA organization has collated the video below (link also provided), of responses that the public provided to the WHO.

We cannot yet fully know the future impacts that will ensue due to the Covid pandemic response measures over the last 3 years, but the responses at the link and video below provide some insight into the suffering and devastation that has already been caused.

Further details of objections to the WHO's power grab is also contained in further Facts below, including details of an international group of lawyers who have joined forces to oppose the WHO's actions.

Link to: The Objectors - Voices from the WHO's Pandemic Preparedness Hearings

FACT: The long-term effects of the vaccines are UNKNOWN - 'Crimes Against Humanity'?

The long term impact of the vaccine injuries and deaths will likely be significant if governments and regulators around the world don’t start investigating the significant increase in excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries, and the huge number of ‘deaths from unknown causes’ that started to appear in 2021 (the year the C19 vaccine rollout commenced), to determine whether or not they are in fact being caused by the C19 vaccines, and then focusing their efforts on finding treatments and cures for those who have been injured.

The treatments and cures must be provided by independent, ethical doctors with no government bias or conflicts of interest. Our health systems have clearly failed us all over the last 3 years, so new systems and solutions directed and managed by ethical, experienced, capable medical experts, need to be established.

Based on the number of deaths and serious injuries from the vaccines reported in numerous government databases globally, many people, including members of parliaments around the world, are already labelling the Covid-19 vaccine rollouts as "Crimes Against Humanity". See video below of German EU MP Christine Anderson, speaking on this issue in the European Parliament.

Sadly, many of those who were injured by the vaccines, were coerced or pressured to take a vaccine that they did not want or need; in many cases with the threat of loss of their job and income if they did not. To date, we have only been able to find one apology from a government leader for this abuse of human rights (see video below).

Throughout the pandemic, tens of thousands of ethical, knowledgeable frontline doctors and nurses, as well as scientific experts, and concerned citizens, have formed organizations to help the vaccine injured.

Please see links below to some organizations who may be able to support you or your loved ones, if you are vaccine injured or concerned about the long-term effects of the vaccines. You will also find many support groups on social media platforms, and other medical groups in your country, as C19 vaccine injury is not rare.

Many countries also have vaccine injury compensation programs, so you should also check with your own government, to find out whether such a scheme exists in your country, as it may provide you with some financial support. Don't you think it is ironic that the very same governments who assured its people that the Covid vaccines were 'safe and effective'', have injury compensation programs in place? The very existence of such programs clearly shows that government regulators knew full well from the outset of the vaccination program, that the vaccines had the potential to cause injury and death.

As more and more evidence is being exposed in mainstream news channels, some are calling for 'amnesty' for those who committed the crimes that led to the death and injury of so many people, and the devastation of communities and economies around the world. But those who knew the truth from very early on in the pandemic because they WERE following the science, but were silenced, clearly say NO AMNESTY - we owe it to all humanity to ensure that we are NOT going to let them get away with it. Please see the video below narrated by Tess Lawrie from the World Council for Health.

USEFUL LINKS:

Christine Anderson - German Member of European Parliament, speaking at the European Parliament

One Leader Apologises to People for Pandemic Policy Failures

NO AMNESTY ! Don't Let Them Get Away With It !

FACT: The long-term effects of lockdowns are UNKNOWN

FACT: The long-term effects of the pandemic responses such as masking, social distancing and lockdowns, on our children’s development is UNKNOWN

FACT: The WHO is trying to gain TOTAL CONTROL over calling future Pandemics, as well as CONTROL over enforcing each country's response

This should be of grave concern to all people in all countries, as this would effectively give the WHO the power to take away all of our human rights at any time and for any reason.

Remember the WHO is an unelected, majority private funded organization, so they are not accountable to the people. They are seeking powers that would override national constitutions and violate fundamental human rights.

It is seeking to gain these powers via a proposed Pandemic Agreement and via changes to the International Health Regulations. In May 2022, some initial amendments that were proposed were voted against.

But subsequently, on October 24-28, 2022, the WHO's IHR Review Committee conducted meetings behind closed doors regarding proposed amendments. The World Council for Health (WCH) is demanding transparency in these dealings.

So far, 14 member nations have submitted proposed changes, yet none of them have been made public, nor is it known who the delegates are that are making these proposals.

Back in May 2022, the United States' own proposal included giving unilateral control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state, to the WHO Director-General - even power over the objection of the member state.

Following a public awareness campaign, all but one of the U.S. proposals were subsequently withdrawn. It is not known whether the new proposals from other nations align with those originally tabled by the United States, but the people of the world have the right to know.

It is very concerning that after the previous submissions were made public and failed due to public outcry that the proposed amendments would effectively give the Director-General of this private organization far reaching control over all of our lives, with no right to object, the WHO decided to try again, but this time behind closed doors. This change from transparency to secrecy should in itself raise alarm bells.

Most of the WHO's funding comes from global elites and their organizations, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI. In addition to the WHO funding, the WHO Foundation, headquartered in Geneva and legally independent from WHO, works with individual donors, the general public and corporate partners to support global public health needs. These individuals and corporations are unelected, yet under the banner of the WHO, they effectively wield enormous power and control over which global health issues are addressed and how they are managed.

Do you really want a repeat of the global Covid pandemic policies and government overreach at the whim of global elites? Don't forget the global elites and their organizations and companies profited handsomely from the Covid 19 pandemic, whilst the average person suffered many losses including their jobs and careers, their businesses, their families and friends, their freedom to travel, their freedom of speech, their health and in too many cases, their lives.

As Senator Ron DeSantis points out in the video below, the global elites were wrong on just about every major covid pandemic response issue from masking to school closures to the vaccine efficacy. Without leaders like him and the many scientists, medical practitioners, lawyers, human rights leaders and concerned citizens around the world, who rejected these policies and spoke out, the world today could look very different. As Governer De Santis points out, 'the elites are now trying to rewrite history,......but they tried to turn us into a Biomedical Security state". His views are shared by billions of people around the world.

Also see video below containing Senator Ron Johnson's warning on the WHO.

We highly recommend that you watch the video at the link below "The Objectors - Voices from the WHO's Pandemic Preparedness Hearings", to hear views and concerns from around the world on the impact of the response to the Covid pandemic, and concerns for the future proposal for pandemic responses by the WHO.

Please also see the video below of UK MP Andrew Bridgen, who is also actively speaking out about the 'discredited WHO' and his concerns over the proposed WHO Treaty. He also states that he was offered 'whatever he wanted' to stay silent on the dangers of the vaccine and his concerns about the WHO.

In July 2023, a group of lawyers from ten countries also released a statement voicing their opposition to the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) proposed Pandemic Treaty, officially known as WHO CA+, and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHRs”). Over the weekend of 30 June to 2 July, 2023, the first international lawyers’ congress of Anwälte für Aufklärung e.V. (English translation Lawyers for Enlightenment e.V.) was held in Cologne, Germany. The congress focused on the IHRs and the Pandemic Treaty.

A strong alliance of lawyers from all over Europe, supported by lawyers worldwide, is forming against the WHO Pandemic Treaty. “We, the lawyers say: No to totalitarianism. Clear statements by the lawyers about the plans to make the WHO a kind of ‘health world government’: We say NO!,” tweeted Dr. Alexander Christ.

Please see a link below to the article on this alliance of lawyers, for further details.

If you are concerned about the proposed Pandemic Agreement being decided and enforced by unelected people and organizations, and handing total control of your health and lifestyle choices over to the Director-General of the WHO, please visit the link below to proposed action by the World Council for Health.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

World Council for Health (WCH)

UK Parliament Member Andrew Bridgen - An Offer for his Silence

Gov Ron De Santis - Global Elites Were Wrong - They Tried to Turn us into a Bio Medical Security State

US Senator Ron Johnson warns the WHO amendments Risk Taking Away All of Our Sovereignty

FACT: WEF pushes its' New World Order agenda including digitized control over health, by infiltrating the cabinets of governments including Canada, New Zealand and Germany

The World Economic Forum states on their website that they are 'committed to using new models of public-private collaboration to develop more resilient, efficient, and equitable healthcare systems."

Whilst this may sound somewhat altruistic, please note the words 'public-private collaboration'. Most of the membership of the WEF are billionaires and private global corporations, they are not government representatives elected by the people, yet they are meeting in private to determine how our personal healthcare should be managed.

They go on to say "We aim to move past our capital-intensive, hospital-centric healthcare delivery model, which is unsustainable and ineffective – and to create new opportunities to advance the use of data-enabled systems and virtual care".

Again, this may sound innocent enough, but who are these self-elected globalist elitists to tell the world that we should move away from the in person, private patient care that we receive from our doctors, to a technology system of 'virtual care'. It is no surprise that this is what happened throughout the Covid pandemic, as you will see in the video at the link below, where the leader of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, boasted how the WEF has 'infiltrated the cabinets' of many countries around the world.

The countries he specifically mentions, Germany, Canada and New Zealand, enforced some of the most draconian policies in the world over the last 3 years, many of which were in line with the WEF's targeted 'data-enabled systems (e.g. Vaccine passports) and virtual care (because people were locked down and could not visit their doctors for important in person health check-ups)

Consider for yourself what the future may hold for our healthcare, if the WEF agenda, which is primarily for the benefit of the billionaires and global corporate members, continues to 'infiltrate' the governments of democratic countries. It is no accident that during the Covid pandemic, there was trillions of dollars of wealth transfer from ordinary, working-class people and small businesses, to the already very rich and powerful members of the WEF.

And now the WEF wants to leverage the impacts of the pandemic to pursue their agenda for "The Great Reset", which includes the plan that "By 2030 You Will Own Nothing & Be Happy". See video at link below which discusses the implications of this proposal. Most notably, you will own nothing, but the global elites and corporations will own everything and effectively have total control over you.

Also see other pages on this website to understand how the agenda of the WEF also drives the global environment agenda and various social issues. Remember, no-one elected these people to tell us how to run our lives. But when they infiltrate our governments, they can do just that, without being elected or accountable to anyone.

EVIDENCE:

USEFUL LINKS:

World Economic Forum - Health and Healthcare Page

Health

1. Was there really a‘pandemic’ – what were the risks of Covid 19, who were at risk, and were there any treatments available?

2. Are the Covid 19 vaccinessafe?

3. Are the Covid 19 vaccineseffective?

4. Werepandemic responses such as testing, masking, social distancing, lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations effective, and the only way out?

5. Should westop the vaccines now and end all Covid related restrictions?

6. What are the future impacts likely to come from the pandemic response measures?

'SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON': Dr. Fauci confronted by DC residents on vaccines

Man Shot Dead Counted and Reported as Covid Death

January 2023 - Former Australian MP Craig Kelly - Statistical Fraud by NSW Health

Disarming the PCR Test - The Unfair Isolation of Healthy People - THiNKTWICE.GLOBAL

US National Institute of Health's Dr Fauci on PCR Testing

Dr Derek Knauss - Analysis of 1500 PCR positive test results - the Flu was relabeled Covid-19

Maddie de Garay - 12 Year Old Pfizer Trial Participant

Robert F Kennedy Jr on Maddie de Garay and Vax for Children

Alarming Stillbirth Data – ‘Irrefutable Evidence The Vaccine Is Killing My Patients’ – Dr. Thorp

Parents Are Watching - Protect the Children - April 2022

Dr Chris Martenson - Massive Consequences Should be Coming for Those Who Were Beyond Negligent in Giving These Shots to Pregnant Woman & Children

MP Rob Roos Questions Pfizer in EU Parliament on whether they Tested the Vaccine to Prevent Transmission of Covid-19

Professor Steele, Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist - The Covid vaccines put in the arm CAN'T WORK!!

December 2022 - German MEP Christine Anderson questions big pharma in EU parliament - Who lied about the vaccines?

Dr Chris Shoemaker - Scientists spent 15 years to find that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses

Jimmy Dore on Ivermectin

Saving Lives With Ivermectin

Fauci claims Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine cannot treat Covid

FDA Backflips on Ivermectin - November 2022

US Senator Ron Johnson Warns of Dangerous Path Planned by an Elite Group of People who want to Take Control Over Our Lives

March 2023 - World Leading Cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough - Don't Take Any More Shots!

How Corrupt is Big Pharma - Dr Aseem Malhotra - Leading UK Cardiologist

Dr Peter Gotzsche Exposes Big Pharma as Organized Crime

We Have A Complete Healthcare System Failure - Dr Malhotra - Sep 2022

Former Pharma Rep - Dispells Myth that Pharma Wants to Cure People

Dr Pierre Kory on Ivermectin and How Big Pharma Corrupted Science

Maajid Nawaz & Dr Peter McCullough on Informed Consent

Dec 2022: Australian Medical Professionals Society - Protection Without Politics

Nuremburg Code and Legal Proceedings for Crimes Against Humanity

AMPS Letter to Medical Practitioners exposes silencing of Doctors by Australian Regulators

Robert F Kennedy Jr. - Government officials in league with Bill Gates and Internet Titans, censor the Truth - Jan 2023

US Senator Hawley Grills Secretary of Department of Homeland Security on Unconstitutional Federally Directed Censorship - November 2022

Jan 2023 - Robert F Kennedy Jr explains how Governments used CIA tactics to suppress free speech and censor media to manipulate society

Jan 2023: Matt Le Tissier outside BBC in support of people killed and harmed by Covid vaccines

Jan 2023 UK Citizens throw white roses across police border on Downing Street to honor the victims of Covid vaccine injury

Jan 2023 - US Dept of Homeland Security outsource censorship of citizens free speech - including over Elections and Covid issues

JFK Tried to Warn US !

Dr Campbell Reviews Newly Released Pfizer Biodistribution Data from Jan 2021

How CDC Advice Changed Over Time as Claims Labelled 'Misinformation' Were Proven to be True!

Until Proven Otherwise - Two of the Top Cardiologists in The World

UK Parliament Member Andrew Bridgen - An Offer for his Silence

Young People Dropping Dead - Former Black Rock Executive Ed Dowd reports Data from Insurance Companies showing 40% Increase in Deaths across Working-Age People since C19 Vax Mandates Commenced

Dr John Campbell - One in 35 Myocardial Injury after Moderna booster

EU MEP - Biggest Corruption Scandal in the World - No-one Knows What is in the Pfizer Vaccine

Holocaust Survivor Vera Sharav: "TheyHave the Capability Today That Hitler Would Have Only Dreamed Of"

Victim of Boris' "Safe & Effective" mRNA Injections, Adam Rowland MSc

British Medical Journal's Editor Dr Peter Doshi raises Alarming Questions about COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns - Nov 2022

Warning from Frontline Nurse in New Zealand - November 2021

Warning From UK Funeral Director - December 2021

South Australian Senator Antic: Covid Vax Rollout Greatest Scandal in Medical History - Nov 2022

Dr John Campbell: Speech by UK MP Andrew Bridgen in UK Parliament - March 2023

This is how we treated Granny during the Pandemic

Joe Rogan Show - Sept 2021 UK Govt data shows 70% of Covid-19 deaths were fully vaccinated people

Dr Stillwagon - Covid-19 Vaccines Give Absolutely No Protection Against Infection

Attorney Thomas Renz confirms Pfizer and Moderna acknowledge in Federal Filings that MRNA Covid products are Gene Therapy

mRNA jabs use genetic engineering yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23

Covid Hearing in European Parliament - Pfizer Admits They Did NOT Test For Transmission

Dr Scott Youngblood - Covid-19: A Time for Reassessment - Presentation to San Diego City Council September 2022

What South Africa Did Right!

Dr Robert Malone - Data Shows Vax May Increase Risk of Infection, Hospitalization & Death Compared to Unvaxxed

Cleveland Study - Dr Mark Trozzi & Christof Plothe, DO - C-19 Injections Actually Increase Your Chances of Getting Covid

Dr Paul Doctor Marik - They've Lied about everything in terms of the vaccine

Data on Covid-19 Deaths in Highly Vaccinated New Zealand by Age and Vaccination Status

Pandemic of the Vaccinated: Canadian Doctor Testifies under Oath that the Vaccinated are More Likely to get Covid and die from Covid and all other causes

March 2023 - Dr Chris Martenson - The C19 Shot is the Single Most Disastrous Medical Intervention in all of Human History

September 2022 UK Government Data shows 70% of those who Died of Covid were Fully Vaccinated

Dr Jay Bhattacharya - They LIED! There was NOT a Scientific Consensus on ANY of the Pandemic Response Measures

Dr Chris Shoemaker - Scientists spent 15 years to find that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses

Australian Regulator TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) confirms that PCR tests are not fit for purpose

Man Shot Dead was Counted as A Covid Death

Dr Derek Knauss - Analysis of 1500 PCR positive test results - the Flu was relabeled Covid-19

Elon Musk on Twitter Conspiracy Theories - Dec 2022

Dec 2022 - Journalist Matt Taiibi with full access to Twitter Files, exposes extent of Collusion on Censorship between US Govt agencies and Big Tech platforms

1. Was there really a‘pandemic’– what were the risks of Covid 19, who were at risk, and were there any treatments available?

4. Werepandemic responsessuch as testing, masking, social distancing, lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations effective, and the only way out?

5. Should westop the vaccinesnow and end all Covid related restrictions?

6. What are the future impactslikely to come from the pandemic response measures?