For 2 years the entire world population was told by their governments, mainstream media channels and high-profile celebrities, that we ALL needed to get vaccinated to stop the transmission of Covid-19.  Perfectly healthy children, and young and middle-aged adults, all of whom were at either no risk, or an extremely low risk, of serious outcomes from contracting Covid 19, were told that they needed to get vaccinated for the sake of the elderly and those in our society who were vulnerable to serious outcomes.  

Many people were not prepared to take the experimental gene therapies which were labelled as 'vaccines', as they were concerned that there had not been enough time for these new drugs to be adequately tested for safety and effectiveness (efficacy).  Many people also understood, that for healthy people, their own natural immunity has always been the best defense against disease.  Therefore, their personal health choice was not to take a new, experimental drug which could have either immediate, or long term, side effects that were not yet known.

Did anyone ask Granny whether she wanted her healthy children and grandchildren to risk unknown side effects of an experimental jab, in her name?  Please see the video "This is how we treated Granny" in the link under Supporting Evidence and decide for yourself whether you think the pandemic measures were the best way to protect Granny.

But instead of allowing people to exercise their own medical freedom in democratic countries,  government leaders and health regulators around the world led the cry for these people to be discriminated against, with extreme measures including  'vaccine passports' and 'vaccine mandates' that ensured the unvaccinated were in many cases excluded from society, unable to work, unable to travel and in many cases 'locked down' in their homes or government mandated quarantine facilities.    Consequently, millions of people around the world lost their jobs, their homes, their families and their friends.  And in poorer countries, many people literally starved to death as they were not able to leave their homes to get food.

Never forget that we were all told that these measures were necessary in order to exclude those people who chose not to take an experimental vaccine which our governments, media and celebrities ASSURED US would 'stop the spread' of Covid 19.  

It became pretty obvious within weeks of the vaccine rollout that these drugs did NOT prevent people from catching or transmitting Covid-19, as the vaccinated population continued to contract Covid-19, in many cases multiple times.  But instead of reviewing the measures taken to manage the pandemic, governments in democratic countries 'doubled down' on measures that clearly were not working, with a second shot, then a booster, then another booster and even more extreme measures, all in a desperate attempt to coerce everyone to take the new experimental drugs in order to 'stop the spread'. 

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide protested, whilst a disproportionately high number of vaccinated people continued to fill up hospital wards, and yet instead of listening to the protestors and looking at the data and science that was available, governments became more forceful in their push to vaccinate the entire population, silencing world renowned scientists and doctors from all countries, who dared to speak out and raise any concerns about the risks and ineffectiveness of both the vaccines and the policies.  

Furthermore, the worldwide cry from political leaders was that this was a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated', even though the data from government databases globally proved that this simply was not even close to being true.  This new call from government leaders, further deepened the divide between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, breaking down families and communities even further.

In October 2022, a senior Pfizer executive finally admitted under question in the EU parliament, that Pfizer had not even tested the so-called Covid 19 'vaccine' for transmission of the virus. Please see various reports on this in the supporting evidence below.  All government regulators who approved the Pfizer vaccine, knew that it had not been tested against stopping the spread of Covid 19, as this was clear from the trial data provided to the regulators prior to the emergency use approval of the new drugs in each country. So why did our governments and mainstream media blatantly lie to us, and discriminate against the unvaccinated based on this very big lie, a lie which destroyed millions of lives around the world? 

An executive from AstraZeneca was also specifically questioned in EU parliament about whether their vaccine was tested to stop the transmission.  They did not answer the question, but instead said that a paper published in the Lancet proved that the vaccines had saved 20 million lives.  But an article in a journal doesn't prove anything.  The data from governments, as well as Health and Life Insurance companies all over the world, do not provide any evidence that any lives were saved by the Covid-19 vaccines.  Please watch the video below to form your own opinion as to whether the executive from Astra Zeneca was being truthful and transparent in her response to the EU MEP. 

Please also read information outlined under other facts on this website for further details of why the vaccines did not protect the elderly and the vulnerable.  The supporting evidence below also includes links to articles and videos that show various data and statistics in relation to the effectiveness of the Covid 19 'vaccines', to assist you in your own assessment of the effectiveness of these experimental products.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Pfizer didn't even test to see if vaccine prevented transmission 
2. South Australian Senator questions Australian Chief Medical Officer on effectiveness of Pfizer vaccine, Paul Kelly Lied!
3. AstraZeneca questioned by EU MEP on whether vaccine was tested for transmission
4. This Is How We Treated Granny

USEFUL LINKS:

1.  Our World in Data

For the average person it is difficult to read and understand the science behind the Covid-19 vaccines, so let's consider this issue simply from a logical, common sense point of view.

When the vaccines were first announced, we were told that 2 shots would be needed to be 'fully vaccinated' against catching or spreading Covid-19.  But not long after the second shot, it was clear that vaccinated people were still catching and spreading Covid-19.  So then our governments told us that we needed a 'booster shot'.  Still vaccinated people were catching Covid-19, for many people more than once.  Again, clearly the vaccines either didn't work, or only worked for a very short period of time.  To any logical person, it simply didn't make sense to keep taking a drug to protect you against a virus, when the drug didn't work the first, second and now third time. 

It also didn't make sense to pressure unvaccinated people to take a drug to protect the vaccinated people, when that same drug didn't work to protect the vaccinated people.  If the vaccine did work, it wouldn't matter if another person chose to remain unvaccinated, as the vaccinated person would be protected against the virus.  If the drug didn't work, why force it on the unvaccinated people?

Clearly the coercion to force unvaccinated people to inject these experimental drugs, was immoral, unethical and would have made no difference whatsoever to the vaccinated people.  In fact the data is now showing that unvaccinated people who have been infected with Covid-19, have a much stronger, longer lasting immunity against the virus, than vaccinated people.  So many of the unvaccinated people are safer to be around than vaccinated people.  The science also now shows that the viral load of the unvaccinated person who catches Covid-19, is no different to the viral load of a vaccinated person.  

A doctor in the UK summed it up nicely in one of the videos under supporting evidence below.  He was asked by the UK Health Minister why he did not want to be vaccinated.  He explained that firstly he had already worked for a year in the Covid ward before the vaccines arrived, so he had already had the virus and therefore had long lasting, natural immunity from further infection.  He then went on to explain that the data showed the vaccine only worked for about 6 weeks, and we were told that you could not be considered to be protected until 2 weeks after the shot, so to keep everyone fully vaccinated, you would need to jab everyone, every month.  This is not only impractical but would likely lead to unknown damage to people's immune systems.  Not long after his response went public, the NHS (National Health Service) in the UK dropped the Covid-19 vaccine mandate for UK health workers, as the doctor's arguments could not be disputed.

Yet in other parts of the world, the mandates for health workers still continue to this day.  How can it be that in one country, health workers don't need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 and yet in most other countries they do?  Is the science different from country to country?  This one example clearly illustrates that Covid-19 vaccination policies are not based on science, but rather on the politics of each country.

The big pharma companies continue to bring out more and more booster shots, indicating that perhaps an annual combined Covid-19 and Flu shot will be recommended.  But remember these vaccines are still experimental and there is no evidence that they are effective, so what is the driver behind pushing more of these vaccines onto the population?  The virus itself is constantly mutating, so each vaccine is designed to target a virus that is no longer in circulation.  This makes no sense at all and most likely explains why the vaccines are not effective in stopping the virus from spreading.

Were you aware that many governments around the world signed contracts with the big pharma companies to purchase enough doses of the vaccine to vaccinate their entire population 10 times over?  And these contracts were not options to purchase, the countries were obligated to purchase this excessive number of vaccine doses, whether they needed them or not.  Why would our governments tell us we needed two jabs to be fully vaccinated, when they had already signed contracts to give us 10 doses?  Clearly someone was not telling the truth about these vaccines from the outset.

One final point that defies logic, is why these experimental drugs are called vaccines.  The definition of a vaccine is that once you inject it, you are protected against catching the virus, usually for life.  These products have been 'marketed' as vaccines, when clearly, they do not fit the traditional meaning of a vaccine.  This deceptive marketing is in breach of many health regulations globally.

You may also be surprised to know that the definition of 'vaccine' was actually changed in some dictionaries just before the Covid-19 vaccines were released, seemingly so as to accommodate these new experimental drugs.  But not many people in the world would have checked the dictionary to confirm the definition.  Those who marketed these new experimental drugs as vaccines, would have clearly known, that when most people were told they were taking a 'vaccine', they would have assumed the traditional meaning of the word 'vaccine', which traditionally protects in most cases for life, or at the very least for many years.

  

Scientists and doctors who specialize in immunology and respiratory viruses, know that intramuscular injections (i.e, injecting a vaccine into the muscle in your arm or body) to vaccinate against respiratory diseases, does not work!

This is not only true from an agreed scientific perspective, but the real world data shows that Flu vaccines do not reduce the number of people being admitted to hospital for influenza like illnesses, nor do they reduce deaths from these illnesses. This has been proven in multiple countries. 

 We have been lied to for decades by pharmaceutical companies and governments about the effectiveness of Flu vaccines, and these same institutions and companies must have known that Covid-19 vaccines could never have been an appropriate response to the viral pandemic.

In the brief video below, Australian Professor Edward J Steele, who is a Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist, explains precisely why the Covid-19 shots could never have prevented anyone from catching or spreading the virus.  

Furthermore, Prof Steele points out that big Pharma, all of his scientific colleagues in Australia, and all of the senior scientists advocating the vaccines know these vaccines can't work, as a vaccine injected into the muscle can't possibly activate local, mucosal oral-nasal immunity. According to Prof Steele "It is a big lie that has been pushed on the population".  

The real world data certainly shows us that Prof Steele is correct.  He spoke of his concerns in September 2021, yet the Australian government and other regulators around the world, continued to push the vaccines and in many countries, including Australia, vaccine mandates still exist even today for some parts of society such as healthcare workers.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1.  Sept 2021 - Prof Edward Steele, Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist and Microbiologist explains why  Covid-19 vaccines injected into the arm CAN NOT WORK!

 

mRNA 'vaccines' created by Moderna and Pfizer are gene therapies.  They meet all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine.  mRNA contain genetic instructions for making various proteins.  They deliver a synthetic version of mRNA into your cells that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-COV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activated your immune system to produce antibodies.

Marketing these products as 'vaccines' is a deceptive practice that violates the law that governs advertising of medical products.

SARS-CoV-2 has not even been proven to be the cause of Covid 19, as the two have not been shown to be causally linked.

Please see the article under supporting evidence below for further details.

The gene based therapies in the Pfizer and Moderna 'vaccines' were part of a completely new class of drug under early research for rare diseases, including genetic defects and cancers intended to be used on relatively small numbers of seriously ill patients where the benefit was hoped to outweigh the considerable risk of serious adverse events associated with gene-based therapies. These risky blue sky drugs were never intended for healthy people, children or pregnant women, and never intended to be used indiscriminately worldwide.

The public was tricked into believing these gene-based 'vaccines' were 'approved'. They are not 'approved'. In each country they fall under either a 'provisional approval' or 'emergency use' approval. There is a huge difference between this type of approval, which is pending the finalization of research, and the difference is that they have not yet been proved to be fully safe and effective as claimed. The manufacturers have been given up to 6 years to provide the outstanding safety and efficacy data, and already after 18 months of use world-wide we are seeing the highest rates of death and serious adverse events ever associated with any drug released in history.

EVIDENCE:

1. COVID-19 'Vaccines' Are Gene Therapy - Joseph Mercola June 26, 2022

It is a fact that the Pfizer Covid-19 trial data showed that vaccinated participants had less than 1% more protection from Covid than the unvaccinated group, but government leaders and the media told us repeatedly that the results showed the vaccine to be 95% effective.  This was a manipulation of the data reporting by promoting the 'relative' risk reduction, instead of the 'absolute' risk reduction.

Please see the video below which explains the true trial results in detail, and how this information was manipulated.

Government regulators all around the world had the trial data before these new experimental drugs were approved. The data only became available to the public long after the vaccines were rolled out, and only then because a judge in the US forced Pfizer to release the data which they wanted to keep hidden for 75 years.  How could the Regulators approve any drug, let alone a new experimental gene therapy, with such low efficacy?  It certainly explains why the vaccines did not work.

How many people would have taken the Pfizer vaccine if they had known that it gave them less than 1% protection from Covid-19?

Whilst it became fairly obvious soon after the vaccine rollout commenced that these vaccines were not working, due to the fact that vaccinated people were still contracting the virus, at the same, if not at a higher rate than the unvaccinated, most governments around the world responded by coercing their citizens to get more and more jabs and putting more and more restrictions on the unvaccinated to try to force them into taking the vaccine. 

Please see a video below of Dr Scott Youngblood who presented evidence to the San Diego City Council in September 2022 calling for the Covid injections to be stopped.  The data presented by Dr Youngblood shows many concerns about the lack of effectiveness of the vaccines, as well as data showing that the vaccines may be causing harm to people's natural immunity system

Dr Youngblood also explains that since 11th August 2022, even the CDC advises as follows:

"CDC's Covid-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person's vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild, and persons who have had Covid-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection."

Many doctors and scientists around the world have been raising concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines from very early in the pandemic, but governments colluding with mainstream media and big tech companies, have ensured that most of these experts were largely silenced.  

But in the second half of 2022, some important truths about the vaccines were finally exposed in more mainstream channels that were able to reach more of the general public.

Firstly, in September 2022, Dr Aseem Malhotra, one of the most highly respected and influential cardiologists in the UK, published a paper  after doing many months of research on all of the available vaccine trial data, as well as other real world data available on vaccination, infections and deaths.  Some of his findings were shocking and he has since been speaking out to try to bring the truth about the vaccines into the mainstream media, as well as addressing UK politicians and regulatory institutions, to call for the vaccine rollout to be stopped until a thorough, independent analysis of all available data on the vaccines can be completed.

One of his key findings is that people are more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the vaccines than they are to be hospitalized by Covid-19, with estimates that 1 in 800 people are likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the vaccines.

He also found in the Pfizer trial data that reports of serious adverse events in the vaccine group,  were higher than hospitalizations in the placebo group.  Also, the all-cause mortality was slightly higher in the vaccinated group.

He also pointed out that in respect of the Pfizer vaccine, that we have been misled about the effectiveness of the vaccine, because Pfizer reported on the 'relative' risk of the vaccine effectiveness, instead of the 'absolute' risk.  What he uncovered is that Pfizer's own data shows that you would need to vaccinate 119 people to stop one Covid-19 infection (i.e. the absolute risk), whereas they reported that their vaccine had a 95% 'relative' risk which is a misleading statistic, that gave people an unfounded confidence in the effectiveness of the vaccine.  

Dr Malhotra also concludes that he does not believe the evidence is there to show that the vaccines have saved millions of lives, it is purely speculation, based on flawed studies. In fact, he points out that in the Pfizer trial, not only was there no reduction in deaths between the vaccinated group and the placebo group, there were actually slightly more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group.

See the videos below of various interviews with Dr Malhotra, where he explains these statistics and discusses his findings in more detail.

Secondly, further confirmation that the Covid-19 vaccines do not stop transmission, was revealed in the EU parliament, when both Pfizer and AstraZeneca executives were specifically asked whether they tested their vaccines for transmission of the virus.  The response from Pfizer was 'No', and AstraZeneca representative simply skirted around the issue and didn't respond.  Eventually she referred to an article published in the Lancet that claimed that 20 million lives had been saved by the vaccines, but there is no evidence of this, it is simply based on computer models, that have been proven to be based on incorrect assumptions.  The real world data does not show any reduced deaths from the vaccines.  In fact the more highly vaccinated countries have higher Covid-19 death rates (see discussion on this Fact above).    

But regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of the Lancet article, that does not answer the question as to whether AstraZeneca tested their drug for transmission, the question was simply evaded and not answered.  One would assume that if the answer was 'YES' the answer would have been provided immediately.

Following the video from the EU MEP which went viral on social media in October, 2022, Australian Senator Rennick also posted the following on his Telegram channel:

"In the last few weeks there has been a lot of discussion around Pfizer not testing whether or not the Vaccine stopped transmission.  In the fine print it's true Pfizer claimed it was unclear as to their vaccine's effectiveness in stopping transmission.  Of course this didn't stop authorities claiming or implying it did stop transmission.  But that's not the only thing that's been overlooked in the fine print.  The six month supplementary Appendix reported adverse events that showed 300% more related adverse events, 75% more severe adverse events and 10% more serious adverse events in the inoculation group than the placebo group.  There were more deaths in the inoculation group as well.  So when authorities claim that the vaccine reduces hospitalization and deaths what evidence are they referring to when they make this claim?  The attached report has been overlooked for far too long."

See videos below from the EU MEPs with further details on the questioning of these pharmaceutical companies about their vaccine trials.  Also, the Pfizer Supplementary Appendix report to which Senator Rennick refers is also linked below - Page 10 shows the table from which Sen Rennick calculated the above percentages.

If you go to the Children's Health Defense website under useful links below, and type "covid vaccine" into the search bar, you will find numerous articles related to the safety and effectiveness of these products.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Pfizer Trial Data Supplementary Appendix

USEFUL LINKS:

1.  Children's Health Defense

Meanwhile, countries who did vaccinate a high percentage of their populations are struggling, and telling their citizens they need repeated injections.

The article below under supporting evidence summarizes Covid-19 death statistics from a number of countries, but here are a few highlights from the article:

"- Israel 72% vaccinated and fully embraced all four boosters - highest Covid-19 death rate on record this year

- Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway - 84%, 83%, 81%, 79% vaccinated - all countries got obliterated by Covid-19 - Denmark, Iceland and Norway each documented their highest death rates in late June/early July 2022

- Canada - 86% vaccinated - did not beat its record death rate, but a similar number of deaths to pre-vaccine, so the vaccines did absolutely nothing

- Japan - 82% vaccinated - worst death rate in year to end June 2022, doubling its pre vaccine record

- Australia - 87% vaccinated - Covid-19 is running through Australia like a bushfire - in the first 6 months of 2022, following mass vaccination, the country had a death record four times greater than at any other time during the pandemic

- New Zealand - 84% vaccinated - significant spike in deaths since around March 2022

- South Korea - 88% vaccinated - huge spike in deaths between March and June 2022

- Hong Kong 89% - the charts in the article speak for themselves - either the vaccines didn't work, or the lockdowns postponed the inevitable.

- Malta 92%- also beat its all-time record post mass vaccination

- Singapore 92% -  one of the most vaccinated countries on the planet, and they recently destroyed their all-time COVID-19 death record… twice"

Another country with low vaccination rates is South Africa.  With only 32% of its population having had the initial 2 doses and only 6% with a booster as at 1 November, 2022, it has one of the lowest death rates from Covid-19.  This may be due to the fact that they use Ivermectin as part of their treatment protocol, a drug that was effectively 'banned' from being used by doctors to treat Covid-19 in most western countries. Please see video under supporting evidence below of a doctor from South Africa who has had a 100% success rate treating Covid-19 in 3,000 patients using Ivermectin (note the video is from earlier in 2022, so the vaccination statistics he quotes are lower than in November 2022).

Another country that has an extremely low death rate from Covid-19 is India.   You can check the figures for yourself at the link below for 'Our World in Data', but interestingly, Uttar Pradesh, the largest state of India with a population over 200 million, distributed treatment packages which included medicines such as Ivermectin, to all of its citizens, rather than just tell them to stay at home until they got so sick that they had to come to hospital (which was the advice in many western countries).

Our governments and regulators like to tell us that the vaccines saved millions of lives, but there is simply no evidence to back up this claim.  All of these highly vaccinated countries had the highest number of Covid-19 deaths per million people, AFTER mass vaccination.  Meanwhile, low vaccinated countries, and countries who used treatments such as Ivermectin, have extremely low death rates.  You can decide for yourself how effective the vaccines are after doing your own research.

You should also consider that another unexpected death rate statistic that has surfaced since mass vaccination commenced, is a significant increase in the 'excess death' rate in highly vaccinated countries.  'Excess deaths' are the number of deaths over and above the number of deaths that would normally be expected to occur in each country, each year.  And what is more alarming is that most of these excess deaths (which are NOT from the Covid-19 virus) are in young people and many are from 'unknown causes'.  This information is being confirmed from multiple sources including government databases and Health and Life Insurance company data.  The issue of excess deaths is also discussed in more detail under questions 2 and 5 on this website.

If you would like to analyze the data on Covid-19 vaccination, infection and death rates for yourself, please see the link below to "Our World in Data", where you can find the information you need.

 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. How Many Lives Were Saved, and Lost, Due to the COVID Vaccines, with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr
2. Haiti did not Vaccinate its Population yet has one of the Lowest Covid-19 Death Rates in the World

USEFUL LINKS:

1.  Our World in Data

  

Evidence for this fact can be found by searching government statistics which show the vaccine status of those who die from, or are hospitalised with, Covid-19.  As more data is revealed that supports this fact, some government agencies appear to be either changing how they report the data, or delaying the reporting of these statistics, so that it is difficult to see precise trends and come to meaningful conclusions.

But fortunately, there are many independant sources of reliable data and reports which prove this fact, in spite of reporting delays by government regulators. 

Once such source is the Cleveland Clinic, a system of over 200 hospitals with 65,000 people working there, which was established in 1821.  The first Cleveland paper on Covid vaccines was reported in September 22.   The study included 12,000 employees unvaxxed, 2395 single jabbed, 13,000 double jabbed, 20,000 triple jabbed, and 3,500 who were 4 or 5 times jabbed with the original vaccine.  The study results show a clear linear relationship between the number of shots and the risk of getting Covid-19, which increases with each shot.   Please see the video below from the World Council for health (WCH) for more details on the results of this study.

Below you will also find some data from highly vaccinated New Zealand for consideration.

Please also see the video below of Dr Paul Marik, an experienced ICU doctor, who confirms "...if you look at the data.....the double-vaccinated, the triple-vaccinated, the quadruple vaccinated - they're at higher risk of being hospitalized than the unvaccinated"". 

You can also find further evidence in the video below from Canadian Doctor Charles Hoffe, who reveals both Canadian and Australian data showing a direct linear correlation that the more vaccine doses you take, the more likely you are to get Covid, the more likely you are to spread Covid, and it damages your immune system so that you have a higher risk of infection, hospitalisation and death.  He refers to the Covid vaccines as 'anti-vaccines'.

But you may also wish to do your own survey of those around you, by comparing the infection and hospitalisation rates amongst those you know who are vaccinated (take note of how many times they have tested positive for Covid, how many vaccine doses they have received, and how severe was their illness), compared to those who are unvaccinated (the number and severity of any Covid illness they may have had).

Just think about this logically, if the fear that our governments and media sought to instill in us was based on facts, then all of our unvaccinated friends and family should be very sick or dying of Covid, whilst the vaccinated remain free of infection.  If that is not what you are seeing around you, then logically, what was being reported could not be based on facts.